{"title":"Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic all-inside anterior talofibular ligament trans- augmentation repair versus modified trans- augmentation repair for patients with chronic ankle instability.","authors":"Dahai Hu, Piao Xie, Boyuan Zheng, Huige Hou, Xiaofei Zheng","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05559-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic ankle instability (CAI) often requires surgical intervention, but the optimal suturing repair technique remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of modified trans augmentation (MTA) suturing repair and trans augmentation (TA) suturing repair to provide a feasible option for patients with CAI and their surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included 73 patients with CAI who treated between February 2019 and January 2021. Patients were assigned to MTA or TA groups based on ligament condition. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, visual analog scale (VAS), anterior drawer test, patient satisfaction, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative AOFAS scores were significantly higher in the MTA group (91.0 ± 7.1) compared to the TA group (83.3 ± 9.4, P < 0.001). Similarly, patient satisfaction was higher in the MTA group (8.6 ± 0.9 vs. 8.1 ± 1.0, P = 0.02), whereas VAS scores were lower (1.2 ± 0.4 vs. 1.4 ± 0.5, P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in anterior drawer test results between the groups (P = 0.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MTA suturing repair demonstrates superior clinical outcomes compared to TA suturing repair, providing a feasible for patients with CAI. These findings highlight the potential of MTA repair to improve patient satisfaction and functional recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829408/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05559-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Chronic ankle instability (CAI) often requires surgical intervention, but the optimal suturing repair technique remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of modified trans augmentation (MTA) suturing repair and trans augmentation (TA) suturing repair to provide a feasible option for patients with CAI and their surgeons.
Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 73 patients with CAI who treated between February 2019 and January 2021. Patients were assigned to MTA or TA groups based on ligament condition. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, visual analog scale (VAS), anterior drawer test, patient satisfaction, and postoperative complications.
Results: Postoperative AOFAS scores were significantly higher in the MTA group (91.0 ± 7.1) compared to the TA group (83.3 ± 9.4, P < 0.001). Similarly, patient satisfaction was higher in the MTA group (8.6 ± 0.9 vs. 8.1 ± 1.0, P = 0.02), whereas VAS scores were lower (1.2 ± 0.4 vs. 1.4 ± 0.5, P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in anterior drawer test results between the groups (P = 0.32).
Conclusions: MTA suturing repair demonstrates superior clinical outcomes compared to TA suturing repair, providing a feasible for patients with CAI. These findings highlight the potential of MTA repair to improve patient satisfaction and functional recovery.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues.
Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications.
JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.