Pharmacological Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pain Management Nursing Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2025.01.007
Ana Carolina de Jesus Palma (Medical Student) , César Romero Antunes Júnior (Medical Student) , Eduardo Silva Reis Barreto (Medical Student) , Vinicius Borges Alencar (Medical Student) , Anna Karla do Nascimento Souza MSc , Clarissa Maria de Cerqueira Mathias PhD. M.D. , Liliane Elze Falcão Lins-Kusterer PhD. , Liana Maria Torres de Araujo Azi PhD. M.D. , Durval Campos Kraychete PhD. M.D.
{"title":"Pharmacological Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials","authors":"Ana Carolina de Jesus Palma (Medical Student) ,&nbsp;César Romero Antunes Júnior (Medical Student) ,&nbsp;Eduardo Silva Reis Barreto (Medical Student) ,&nbsp;Vinicius Borges Alencar (Medical Student) ,&nbsp;Anna Karla do Nascimento Souza MSc ,&nbsp;Clarissa Maria de Cerqueira Mathias PhD. M.D. ,&nbsp;Liliane Elze Falcão Lins-Kusterer PhD. ,&nbsp;Liana Maria Torres de Araujo Azi PhD. M.D. ,&nbsp;Durval Campos Kraychete PhD. M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2025.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) affects up to 80% of patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy. This painful condition significantly impairs quality of life and often necessitates dose reduction or discontinuation of chemotherapy, negatively impacting overall survival. Currently, duloxetine is the only pharmacological treatment recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of various pharmacological interventions in CIPN treatment, providing substantial evidence for clinical practice and future research.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to assess the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for CIPN.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Herbal and phytotherapeutic treatments were excluded. Two independent reviewers performed the study selection, with a third reviewer resolving disagreements. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the COCHRANE's RoB 2 tool.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 860 screened articles, 17 RCTs met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 15 different pharmacological agents. Duloxetine, pregabalin, and amitriptyline were the most studied. Thirteen studies utilized a placebo as a control. Investigated medications exhibited varied outcomes, with some showing significant benefits in reducing neuropathic pain while others did not demonstrate statistically significant efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Duloxetine is an effective and well-tolerated option, while pregabalin shows promising results but requires further investigation. Other agents, such as venlafaxine and tapentadol, lack strong supporting evidence. Treatments like acetyl-<span>l</span>-carnitine, monosialotetrahexo-sylganglioside 1, and tetrodoxine yield inconsistent results, highlighting the need for additional research. Larger RCTs are recommended for comprehensive evaluation. Nurses are essential in CIPN care by monitoring symptoms, educating patients, and collaborating with the team.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":"26 3","pages":"Pages 249-263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904225000207","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) affects up to 80% of patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy. This painful condition significantly impairs quality of life and often necessitates dose reduction or discontinuation of chemotherapy, negatively impacting overall survival. Currently, duloxetine is the only pharmacological treatment recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of various pharmacological interventions in CIPN treatment, providing substantial evidence for clinical practice and future research.

Design

This systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to assess the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for CIPN.

Methods

Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Herbal and phytotherapeutic treatments were excluded. Two independent reviewers performed the study selection, with a third reviewer resolving disagreements. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the COCHRANE's RoB 2 tool.

Results

Out of 860 screened articles, 17 RCTs met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 15 different pharmacological agents. Duloxetine, pregabalin, and amitriptyline were the most studied. Thirteen studies utilized a placebo as a control. Investigated medications exhibited varied outcomes, with some showing significant benefits in reducing neuropathic pain while others did not demonstrate statistically significant efficacy.

Conclusion

Duloxetine is an effective and well-tolerated option, while pregabalin shows promising results but requires further investigation. Other agents, such as venlafaxine and tapentadol, lack strong supporting evidence. Treatments like acetyl-l-carnitine, monosialotetrahexo-sylganglioside 1, and tetrodoxine yield inconsistent results, highlighting the need for additional research. Larger RCTs are recommended for comprehensive evaluation. Nurses are essential in CIPN care by monitoring symptoms, educating patients, and collaborating with the team.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化疗引起的神经病变的药物治疗:随机临床试验的系统回顾。
目的:化疗引起的周围神经病变(CIPN)影响高达80%的接受细胞毒性化疗的患者。这种痛苦的状况严重损害了生活质量,常常需要减少剂量或停止化疗,对总体生存产生负面影响。目前,度洛西汀是美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)推荐的唯一药物治疗。本系统综述旨在评价各种药物干预治疗CIPN的疗效,为临床实践和未来研究提供实质性证据。设计:本系统评价遵循系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行,以评估CIPN药物治疗的有效性。方法:只纳入随机对照试验(RCTs)。草药和植物治疗被排除在外。两名独立的审稿人进行研究选择,第三名审稿人解决分歧。使用COCHRANE的RoB 2工具进行偏倚风险评估。结果:在860篇筛选文章中,17篇rct符合纳入标准,包括15种不同的药物。度洛西汀、普瑞巴林和阿米替林的研究最多。13项研究使用安慰剂作为对照。所研究的药物表现出不同的结果,一些药物在减轻神经性疼痛方面显示出显着的益处,而另一些药物则没有统计学上显着的疗效。结论:度洛西汀是一种有效且耐受性良好的治疗方案,而普瑞巴林疗效良好,但需要进一步研究。其他药物,如文拉法辛和他他多,缺乏强有力的支持证据。像乙酰左旋肉碱、单唾液酸四己基神经节苷脂1和河蟹醇等治疗产生不一致的结果,强调需要进一步的研究。建议采用较大的随机对照试验进行综合评价。护士通过监测症状、教育患者和与团队合作,在CIPN护理中发挥着至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
期刊最新文献
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Chronic Pain: Bibliometric Analysis. Empowerment Intervention in Female Patients With Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Nurse Counseling Based on Planned Behavior Theory in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. To Join or Not to Join: A Nurse's Story of "Why". Evidence Mapping of TCM Nursing Appropriate Technology in Treatment of Cancer Pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1