Investigation of Vocal Fatigue, Anxiety Level, and Perceived Communication Skills According to the Purpose of Mask Use During the Pandemic.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Voice Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.008
Elif Ezgi Işik, Ceki Paltura, Ömer Necati Develi Oğlu
{"title":"Investigation of Vocal Fatigue, Anxiety Level, and Perceived Communication Skills According to the Purpose of Mask Use During the Pandemic.","authors":"Elif Ezgi Işik, Ceki Paltura, Ömer Necati Develi Oğlu","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of face masks during COVID-19 causes communication difficulties. Determining the effects of face masks can provide precautions against possible voice problems. The aim of the study is to determine the difference between vocal fatigue and anxiety levels depending on the use of masks in basic and basic-professional activities.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was conducted in a descriptive and cross-sectional design. Data were collected between March and May 2021. The study included 476 people aged 18-65 years. Participants were divided into two groups according to the purpose of mask use; \"wearing masks only for essential activities\" group (EA) and \"wearing masks for essential-professional activities\" group (EPA). Vocal Fatigue Inventory (VFI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Self-Assessment Questions were used in the study. All scales and subjective evaluation questions were transferred to Google Forms. The link was sent to participants living in Turkey with a letter of consent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VFI-Factor 1, VFI-Factor 2, VFI-Factor 3, VFI Total, and BAI scores differed statistically significantly between the groups. VFI and BAI scores of the EPA group were found to be higher. There was a correlation between all factors of VFI and BAI scores. According to the results of regression analysis, it was found that the purpose of mask use and BAI score increased the VFI score. When the EPA group was masked, their results on respiratory control abilities, auditory perception, and speech intelligibility were shown to be lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regardless of the purpose of use, face masks have been found to reduce speech intelligibility, auditory feedback, and the ability to maintain breath control while speaking. The findings of our study suggest that longer mask use may increase the VFI score.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The use of face masks during COVID-19 causes communication difficulties. Determining the effects of face masks can provide precautions against possible voice problems. The aim of the study is to determine the difference between vocal fatigue and anxiety levels depending on the use of masks in basic and basic-professional activities.

Materials and methods: This study was conducted in a descriptive and cross-sectional design. Data were collected between March and May 2021. The study included 476 people aged 18-65 years. Participants were divided into two groups according to the purpose of mask use; "wearing masks only for essential activities" group (EA) and "wearing masks for essential-professional activities" group (EPA). Vocal Fatigue Inventory (VFI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Self-Assessment Questions were used in the study. All scales and subjective evaluation questions were transferred to Google Forms. The link was sent to participants living in Turkey with a letter of consent.

Results: VFI-Factor 1, VFI-Factor 2, VFI-Factor 3, VFI Total, and BAI scores differed statistically significantly between the groups. VFI and BAI scores of the EPA group were found to be higher. There was a correlation between all factors of VFI and BAI scores. According to the results of regression analysis, it was found that the purpose of mask use and BAI score increased the VFI score. When the EPA group was masked, their results on respiratory control abilities, auditory perception, and speech intelligibility were shown to be lower.

Conclusion: Regardless of the purpose of use, face masks have been found to reduce speech intelligibility, auditory feedback, and the ability to maintain breath control while speaking. The findings of our study suggest that longer mask use may increase the VFI score.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据大流行期间使用口罩的目的调查发声疲劳、焦虑程度和感知的沟通技巧。
目的:新型冠状病毒肺炎期间佩戴口罩导致沟通困难。确定口罩的效果可以预防可能出现的声音问题。这项研究的目的是确定在基本和基本专业活动中使用口罩的声音疲劳和焦虑水平之间的差异。材料和方法:本研究采用描述性和横断面设计。数据收集于2021年3月至5月。该研究包括476名年龄在18-65岁之间的人。参与者按口罩使用目的分为两组;“仅在必要活动时佩戴口罩”组(EA)和“在必要专业活动时佩戴口罩”组(EPA)。采用声带疲劳量表(VFI)、贝克焦虑量表(BAI)和自评问卷进行研究。所有的量表和主观评价问题都被转移到谷歌表格中。该链接被发送给居住在土耳其的参与者,并附有一份同意书。结果:VFI- factor 1、VFI- factor 2、VFI- factor 3、VFI Total、BAI评分组间差异有统计学意义。EPA组的VFI和BAI评分较高。VFI各因素与BAI评分均有相关性。根据回归分析结果,发现口罩使用目的和BAI评分均使VFI评分升高。当EPA组被蒙住时,他们在呼吸控制能力、听觉感知和言语清晰度方面的结果显示较低。结论:无论使用目的如何,已发现口罩会降低说话时的语音清晰度、听觉反馈和维持呼吸控制的能力。我们的研究结果表明,口罩使用时间越长,VFI评分越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
期刊最新文献
Validation of the Voice Handicap Index 10 (VHI-10) in the French-Speaking Cultural Environment of Quebec (VHI-10-QC). Methotrexate in the Management of Laryngotracheal Stenosis: A Narrative Review. Assessment of Register Accessibility and Vocal Range Using Electroglottography Analysis in Experienced Singers. Improving Auditory-Perceptual Voice Assessment: A Hybrid In-Class and Online CAPE-V Training Study. Noninvasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) Techniques Application in Voice Disorders: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1