Evaluating postoperative outcomes of arthroscopic rotator interval release after rotator cuff repair: a randomized prospective trial

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.050
Amir M. Boubekri MD , Michael Scheidt MD , Hassan Farooq MD , Andrew Chen MD , Stanley Liu MA , Thomas Stanila BS , Krishin Shivdasani MD, MPH , Dane Salazar MD, MBA , Nickolas Garbis MD
{"title":"Evaluating postoperative outcomes of arthroscopic rotator interval release after rotator cuff repair: a randomized prospective trial","authors":"Amir M. Boubekri MD ,&nbsp;Michael Scheidt MD ,&nbsp;Hassan Farooq MD ,&nbsp;Andrew Chen MD ,&nbsp;Stanley Liu MA ,&nbsp;Thomas Stanila BS ,&nbsp;Krishin Shivdasani MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Dane Salazar MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Nickolas Garbis MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Simultaneous rotator interval release is not classically performed during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). However, concurrent rotator interval release has been anecdotally reported to facilitate less propensity for postoperative shoulder stiffness. The purpose of our investigation was to compare outcomes of pain and stiffness among patients who underwent arthroscopic RCR with and without concomitant rotator interval release.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial<span><span> was conducted between September 2018 and April 2021. Outcomes including visual analog scale, </span>narcotic<span> usage, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, active forward flexion, and active external rotation range of motion measurements were obtained at 4-6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and at the most recent follow-up postoperatively.</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span><span>A total of 83 patients were prospectively enrolled and randomized into RCR with rotator interval vs. without interval release. The postoperative temporal association between the visual analog scale score, </span>American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score<span>, and average narcotic pain tablet use did not depend on group assignment (</span></span><em>P</em> = .990, <em>P</em> = .760, and <em>P</em> = .700, respectively). Similarly, the association between time point and active forward flexion and active external rotation range of motion did not depend on group assignment (<em>P</em> = .300 and <em>P</em> = .630, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Arthroscopic rotator interval release during RCR showed no statistically significant difference in short-term or long-term postoperative pain or range of motion outcomes compared with control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":"34 10","pages":"Pages 2368-2377"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274625001417","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Simultaneous rotator interval release is not classically performed during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). However, concurrent rotator interval release has been anecdotally reported to facilitate less propensity for postoperative shoulder stiffness. The purpose of our investigation was to compare outcomes of pain and stiffness among patients who underwent arthroscopic RCR with and without concomitant rotator interval release.

Methods

A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted between September 2018 and April 2021. Outcomes including visual analog scale, narcotic usage, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, active forward flexion, and active external rotation range of motion measurements were obtained at 4-6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and at the most recent follow-up postoperatively.

Results

A total of 83 patients were prospectively enrolled and randomized into RCR with rotator interval vs. without interval release. The postoperative temporal association between the visual analog scale score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and average narcotic pain tablet use did not depend on group assignment (P = .990, P = .760, and P = .700, respectively). Similarly, the association between time point and active forward flexion and active external rotation range of motion did not depend on group assignment (P = .300 and P = .630, respectively).

Conclusion

Arthroscopic rotator interval release during RCR showed no statistically significant difference in short-term or long-term postoperative pain or range of motion outcomes compared with control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估肩袖修复后关节镜下旋转体间隙松解术的术后效果:一项随机前瞻性试验。
背景:在关节镜下肩袖修复(RCR)中,经典的做法不是同时进行肩袖间隙释放。然而,据报道,肩关节间隙同时松解可以减少术后肩关节僵硬的倾向。本研究的目的是比较接受关节镜下肩袖修复术并伴有或不伴有肩袖间隙松解的患者的疼痛和僵硬的结果。方法:2018年9月至2021年4月进行单盲、随机对照试验。结果包括视觉模拟评分(VAS)、麻醉使用、美国肩关节外科医生(ASES)肩关节评分、主动前屈(aFF)和主动外旋(aER)运动范围测量,分别在术后4-6周、3个月、6个月和最近的随访中收集。结果:83例患者被纳入前瞻性研究,随机分为旋转间隙释放组和非旋转间隙释放组。术后VAS评分、as评分和平均麻醉镇痛片使用的时间相关性不依赖于组分配(P = 0.990、P = 0.760和P = 0.700)。同样,时间点与aFF和aER运动范围之间的关联不依赖于组分配(P分别= 0.300和P = 0.630)。结论:与对照组相比,关节镜下旋转袖修复期间的旋转间隙释放在短期或长期术后疼痛或活动范围方面无统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Muscle activation variability in relation to functional internal rotation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for rotator cuff repair surgery Functional and radiographic outcomes after surgical management of complex proximal ulna fractures: a retrospective case series Pyrolytic carbon head hemiarthroplasty vs. cobalt-chromium head for proximal humerus fractures: a short-term follow-up study Incidence and risk factors for aseptic glenoid baseplate loosening in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty using the Aramis implant baseplate with a minimum of 2 years follow-up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1