A Review of Screening Guidelines for Hypoglycaemia in Infants Born Small for Gestational Age Showed Numerous Differences and Few Certainties.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Acta Paediatrica Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1111/apa.70010
Giulia Remaschi, Carlo Dani
{"title":"A Review of Screening Guidelines for Hypoglycaemia in Infants Born Small for Gestational Age Showed Numerous Differences and Few Certainties.","authors":"Giulia Remaschi, Carlo Dani","doi":"10.1111/apa.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Different hypoglycaemia screening guidelines for infants born small for gestational age (SGA) are applied throughout the world. This narrative review analysed the published guidelines and evaluated the characteristic features of hypoglycaemia in SGA infants to assess the relevance of the issue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were reviewed for papers regarding hypoglycaemia and hypoglycaemia screening guidelines in term and near-term SGA infants. We also searched government-related websites and national healthcare institution websites for guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Numerous differences among guidelines were found. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the Pediatric Endocrine Society do not specify which SGA infants need screening. Other guidelines suggest screening infants with birth weight < 10th percentile, while still others < 2nd percentile. Depending on the growth curves, the SGA population may change. The hypoglycaemia cut-off value was another relevant variance. The duration of glucose level checks varies from the first 4-24 h of life. The reported incidence of hypoglycaemia was 12%-52%. The timing of hypoglycaemia onset was 2-6 h of life. Specific risk factors for hypoglycaemia in SGA infants were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Numerous differences were found in the hypoglycaemia guidelines for SGA infants, and further studies are needed to address strong and uniform guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":55562,"journal":{"name":"Acta Paediatrica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Paediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.70010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Different hypoglycaemia screening guidelines for infants born small for gestational age (SGA) are applied throughout the world. This narrative review analysed the published guidelines and evaluated the characteristic features of hypoglycaemia in SGA infants to assess the relevance of the issue.

Methods: PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were reviewed for papers regarding hypoglycaemia and hypoglycaemia screening guidelines in term and near-term SGA infants. We also searched government-related websites and national healthcare institution websites for guidelines.

Results: Numerous differences among guidelines were found. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the Pediatric Endocrine Society do not specify which SGA infants need screening. Other guidelines suggest screening infants with birth weight < 10th percentile, while still others < 2nd percentile. Depending on the growth curves, the SGA population may change. The hypoglycaemia cut-off value was another relevant variance. The duration of glucose level checks varies from the first 4-24 h of life. The reported incidence of hypoglycaemia was 12%-52%. The timing of hypoglycaemia onset was 2-6 h of life. Specific risk factors for hypoglycaemia in SGA infants were found.

Conclusion: Numerous differences were found in the hypoglycaemia guidelines for SGA infants, and further studies are needed to address strong and uniform guidance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的:世界各地针对胎龄小婴儿(SGA)采用了不同的低血糖筛查指南。本叙述性综述分析了已发布的指南,并评估了 SGA 婴儿低血糖的特征,以评估该问题的相关性:方法:我们在 PubMed 和 Cochrane 系统综述数据库中检索了有关足月和近足月 SGA 婴儿低血糖和低血糖筛查指南的论文。我们还在政府相关网站和国家医疗机构网站上搜索了相关指南:结果:我们发现不同指南之间存在许多差异。美国儿科学会和儿科内分泌学会没有明确指出哪些 SGA 婴儿需要筛查。其他指南则建议根据婴儿出生体重进行筛查:针对 SGA 婴儿的低血糖指南存在许多差异,需要进一步研究,以制定强有力的统一指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Paediatrica
Acta Paediatrica 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
384
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Paediatrica is a peer-reviewed monthly journal at the forefront of international pediatric research. It covers both clinical and experimental research in all areas of pediatrics including: neonatal medicine developmental medicine adolescent medicine child health and environment psychosomatic pediatrics child health in developing countries
期刊最新文献
Cardiorespiratory and Metabolic Responses to Daily Activities in Children: Examining Sex Differences and Weight Categories. Association Between Prenatal Antibiotic Exposure and Infant Wheeze Outcomes. Implementation of Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir for Children Aged 3-12 Years With Chronic Hepatitis C: Multicentre Israeli Experience. Corrigendum to 'Optimal Breastfeeding Practices and Infant and Child Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'. Less Invasive Surfactant Administration Versus Intubate-Surfactant-Extubate: Associated With Reduced Mechanical Ventilation in Extremely Preterm Infants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1