Assign a systematic traumatological status in orbital fracture patients - A prospective cohort study

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2024.11.020
Anssi Lahtinen, Matti Nikunen, Miika Toivari, Jussi Furuholm, Johanna Snäll
{"title":"Assign a systematic traumatological status in orbital fracture patients - A prospective cohort study","authors":"Anssi Lahtinen,&nbsp;Matti Nikunen,&nbsp;Miika Toivari,&nbsp;Jussi Furuholm,&nbsp;Johanna Snäll","doi":"10.1016/j.jcms.2024.11.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study aims to clarify the injury profile and the causes leading to missed injuries in isolated orbital fracture patients. The hypothesis was that orbital fracture patients are prone to underdiagnosis, especially regarding injuries to other body parts. Both injury profiles and causes leading to missed injuries in isolated orbital fracture patients were evaluated in a prospective cohort study. The patients were examined systematically by the oral and maxillofacial surgeon and an on-call orthopaedic traumatologist. The patients were also referred to ophthalmology for consultation. The study includes 213 patients. Associated injuries of other body parts and additional facial injuries were found in 26.2% and 25.8% of the 213 patients, respectively. The most common injuries outside the facial region were upper limb injuries (10.8%) and traumatic brain injuries (9.4%). In all, 18.8% of the patients had at least one injury that was not suspected or diagnosed primarily. More specifically, 28.6% of injuries outside the facial region were found later, and 25.5% of additional facial injuries were not detected or suspected primarily. Of eye injuries requiring further ophthalmological care, 66.7% were found only at the ophthalmologist's examination. Isolated orbital fracture patients require comprehensive examination by traumatologists focusing on orthopaedic and intracranial injuries as well as facial injuries. Additionally, close collaboration with ophthalmologists is recommended in the early stage after injury.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"53 5","pages":"Pages 651-656"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010518224003317","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aims to clarify the injury profile and the causes leading to missed injuries in isolated orbital fracture patients. The hypothesis was that orbital fracture patients are prone to underdiagnosis, especially regarding injuries to other body parts. Both injury profiles and causes leading to missed injuries in isolated orbital fracture patients were evaluated in a prospective cohort study. The patients were examined systematically by the oral and maxillofacial surgeon and an on-call orthopaedic traumatologist. The patients were also referred to ophthalmology for consultation. The study includes 213 patients. Associated injuries of other body parts and additional facial injuries were found in 26.2% and 25.8% of the 213 patients, respectively. The most common injuries outside the facial region were upper limb injuries (10.8%) and traumatic brain injuries (9.4%). In all, 18.8% of the patients had at least one injury that was not suspected or diagnosed primarily. More specifically, 28.6% of injuries outside the facial region were found later, and 25.5% of additional facial injuries were not detected or suspected primarily. Of eye injuries requiring further ophthalmological care, 66.7% were found only at the ophthalmologist's examination. Isolated orbital fracture patients require comprehensive examination by traumatologists focusing on orthopaedic and intracranial injuries as well as facial injuries. Additionally, close collaboration with ophthalmologists is recommended in the early stage after injury.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼眶骨折患者的系统创伤状态-一项前瞻性队列研究。
本研究旨在阐明孤立性眼眶骨折患者的损伤情况及导致漏伤的原因。假设是眶骨折患者容易被误诊,特别是对身体其他部位的损伤。在一项前瞻性队列研究中,对孤立性眼眶骨折患者的损伤概况和导致漏伤的原因进行了评估。患者由口腔颌面外科医生和一名随叫随到的骨科创伤学家进行系统检查。患者也被转到眼科会诊。该研究包括213名患者。213例患者中合并其他身体部位损伤和面部附加损伤分别占26.2%和25.8%。面部以外最常见的损伤是上肢损伤(10.8%)和外伤性脑损伤(9.4%)。总的来说,18.8%的患者至少有一种未被怀疑或诊断的损伤。更具体地说,28.6%的面部外损伤是后来发现的,25.5%的额外面部损伤是最初没有发现或怀疑的。在需要进一步眼科护理的眼部损伤中,66.7%仅在眼科医生的检查中发现。孤立性眶骨折患者需要由创伤学家进行全面检查,重点是骨科和颅内损伤以及面部损伤。此外,在受伤后的早期阶段,建议与眼科医生密切合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
22.60%
发文量
117
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery publishes articles covering all aspects of surgery of the head, face and jaw. Specific topics covered recently have included: • Distraction osteogenesis • Synthetic bone substitutes • Fibroblast growth factors • Fetal wound healing • Skull base surgery • Computer-assisted surgery • Vascularized bone grafts
期刊最新文献
Closed treatment versus open reduction and internal fixation for mandibular condylar head fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis Predictors of prolonged ICU stay after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: the role of blood loss and intraoperative fluid management. A retrospective study Customized guided box osteotomies in pediatric patients with orbital hypertelorism Quality of life, patient satisfaction and treatment outcomes following temporomandibular joint arthroplasty in two University Hospitals in Norway: A 5-year retrospective evaluation Precision therapy for BRAF V600E–mutated ameloblastoma: Systematic review insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1