Effect of chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine, and hydrogen peroxide irrigation on pain and swelling after mandibular third molar surgery: randomized controlled trial.

M Shahraki, A H Khazaei, S Hakimi, M Hasheminasab, S A Haradasht
{"title":"Effect of chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine, and hydrogen peroxide irrigation on pain and swelling after mandibular third molar surgery: randomized controlled trial.","authors":"M Shahraki, A H Khazaei, S Hakimi, M Hasheminasab, S A Haradasht","doi":"10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to compare the effects of irrigation solutions containing chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine, or hydrogen peroxide on pain and swelling following mandibular third molar surgery. This prospective randomized controlled trial employed a single-blind design. Overall, 112 patients were randomized to four groups based on the antiseptic assigned for the intervention: control, chlorhexidine (CHX), povidone-iodine (PI), and hydrogen peroxide (HP). The patients were followed up on days 1, 3, 7, and 15 after surgery, and pain and swelling were assessed. Data were analysed using ANOVA and post hoc multiple comparison tests. The CHX and HP groups demonstrated significantly lower mean pain scores compared to the control group on days 3 (P = 0.021, P = 0.033) and 7 (P = 0.002, P = 0.017). Regarding the difference in swelling from baseline (before surgery) on each follow-up day, the CHX and HP groups showed significantly less swelling compared to the control group on days 1 (P = 0.023, P = 0.012), 3 (P = 0.007, P = 0.001), and 7 (P = 0.002, P = 0.018). Moreover, the CHX and HP groups demonstrated significantly lower mean swelling changes from baseline compared to PI: CHX vs PI on day 7 (P = 0.032), HP vs PI on day 1 (P = 0.037). In conclusion, chlorhexidine and hydrogen peroxide solutions are highly beneficial options for socket irrigation following mandibular third molar surgery. This study showed a more prominent reduction in pain and swelling with chlorhexidine and hydrogen peroxide solutions compared to povidone-iodine solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":94053,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the effects of irrigation solutions containing chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine, or hydrogen peroxide on pain and swelling following mandibular third molar surgery. This prospective randomized controlled trial employed a single-blind design. Overall, 112 patients were randomized to four groups based on the antiseptic assigned for the intervention: control, chlorhexidine (CHX), povidone-iodine (PI), and hydrogen peroxide (HP). The patients were followed up on days 1, 3, 7, and 15 after surgery, and pain and swelling were assessed. Data were analysed using ANOVA and post hoc multiple comparison tests. The CHX and HP groups demonstrated significantly lower mean pain scores compared to the control group on days 3 (P = 0.021, P = 0.033) and 7 (P = 0.002, P = 0.017). Regarding the difference in swelling from baseline (before surgery) on each follow-up day, the CHX and HP groups showed significantly less swelling compared to the control group on days 1 (P = 0.023, P = 0.012), 3 (P = 0.007, P = 0.001), and 7 (P = 0.002, P = 0.018). Moreover, the CHX and HP groups demonstrated significantly lower mean swelling changes from baseline compared to PI: CHX vs PI on day 7 (P = 0.032), HP vs PI on day 1 (P = 0.037). In conclusion, chlorhexidine and hydrogen peroxide solutions are highly beneficial options for socket irrigation following mandibular third molar surgery. This study showed a more prominent reduction in pain and swelling with chlorhexidine and hydrogen peroxide solutions compared to povidone-iodine solution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correlation between condylar repositioning, resorption, and mandibular relapse post-orthognathic surgery with the straight locking miniplate technique in patients with Class II and III malocclusion: a retrospective study. Effect of chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine, and hydrogen peroxide irrigation on pain and swelling after mandibular third molar surgery: randomized controlled trial. Long-term outcomes of open treatment of condylar head fractures using cannulated headless bone screws-a retrospective analysis. Pretreatment nutritional indices are associated with survival and T-cell exhaustion in recurrent or metastatic oral squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective cohort study. Response to the comment on "Deep convolutional neural network for automatic segmentation and classification of jaw tumors in contrast-enhanced computed tomography images".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1