Towards clinical prediction with transparency: An explainable AI approach to survival modelling in residential aged care

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computer methods and programs in biomedicine Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108653
Teo Susnjak, Elise Griffin
{"title":"Towards clinical prediction with transparency: An explainable AI approach to survival modelling in residential aged care","authors":"Teo Susnjak,&nbsp;Elise Griffin","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objective:</h3><div>Scalable, flexible and highly interpretable tools for predicting mortality in residential aged care facilities for the purpose of informing and optimizing palliative care decisions, do not exist. This study is the first and most comprehensive work applying machine learning to address this need while seeking to offer a transformative approach to integrating AI into palliative care decision-making. The objective is to predict survival in elderly individuals six months post-admission to residential aged care facilities with patient-level interpretability for transparency and support for clinical decision-making for palliative care options.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>Data from 11,944 residents across 40 facilities, with a novel combination of 18 features was used to develop predictive models, comparing standard approaches like Cox Proportional Hazards, Ridge and Lasso Regression with machine learning algorithms, Gradient Boosting (GB) and Random Survival Forest. Model calibration was performed together with ROC and a suite of evaluation metrics to analyze results. Explainable AI (XAI) tools were used to demonstrate both the cohort-level and patient-level model interpretability to enable transparency in the clinical usage of the models. TRIPOD reporting guidelines were followed, with model parameters and code provided publicly.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>GB was the top performer with a Dynamic AUROC of 0.746 and a Concordance Index of 0.716 for six-month survival prediction. Explainable AI tools provided insights into key features such as comorbidities, cognitive impairment, and nutritional status, revealing their impact on survival outcomes and interactions that inform clinical decision-making. The calibrated model showed near-optimal performance with adjustable clinically relevant thresholds. The integration of XAI tools proved effective in enhancing the transparency and trustworthiness of predictions, offering actionable insights that support informed and ethically responsible end-of-life (EoL) care decisions in aged care settings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>This study successfully applied machine learning to create viable survival models for aged care residents, demonstrating their usability for clinical settings via a suite of interpretable tools. The findings support the introduction into clinical trials of machine learning with explainable AI tools in geriatric medicine for mortality prediction to enhance the quality of EoL care and informed discussions regarding palliative care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10624,"journal":{"name":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","volume":"263 ","pages":"Article 108653"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169260725000707","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objective:

Scalable, flexible and highly interpretable tools for predicting mortality in residential aged care facilities for the purpose of informing and optimizing palliative care decisions, do not exist. This study is the first and most comprehensive work applying machine learning to address this need while seeking to offer a transformative approach to integrating AI into palliative care decision-making. The objective is to predict survival in elderly individuals six months post-admission to residential aged care facilities with patient-level interpretability for transparency and support for clinical decision-making for palliative care options.

Methods:

Data from 11,944 residents across 40 facilities, with a novel combination of 18 features was used to develop predictive models, comparing standard approaches like Cox Proportional Hazards, Ridge and Lasso Regression with machine learning algorithms, Gradient Boosting (GB) and Random Survival Forest. Model calibration was performed together with ROC and a suite of evaluation metrics to analyze results. Explainable AI (XAI) tools were used to demonstrate both the cohort-level and patient-level model interpretability to enable transparency in the clinical usage of the models. TRIPOD reporting guidelines were followed, with model parameters and code provided publicly.

Results:

GB was the top performer with a Dynamic AUROC of 0.746 and a Concordance Index of 0.716 for six-month survival prediction. Explainable AI tools provided insights into key features such as comorbidities, cognitive impairment, and nutritional status, revealing their impact on survival outcomes and interactions that inform clinical decision-making. The calibrated model showed near-optimal performance with adjustable clinically relevant thresholds. The integration of XAI tools proved effective in enhancing the transparency and trustworthiness of predictions, offering actionable insights that support informed and ethically responsible end-of-life (EoL) care decisions in aged care settings.

Conclusion:

This study successfully applied machine learning to create viable survival models for aged care residents, demonstrating their usability for clinical settings via a suite of interpretable tools. The findings support the introduction into clinical trials of machine learning with explainable AI tools in geriatric medicine for mortality prediction to enhance the quality of EoL care and informed discussions regarding palliative care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向临床预测与透明度:一个可解释的人工智能方法,生存建模在住宅老年护理
背景与目的:目前尚不存在可扩展、灵活和高度可解释的工具,用于预测住宅老年护理机构的死亡率,以便为姑息治疗决策提供信息和优化。这项研究是第一个也是最全面的应用机器学习来解决这一需求的工作,同时寻求提供一种将人工智能纳入姑息治疗决策的变革性方法。目的是预测住院老年护理机构入院后6个月的老年人生存率,患者水平可解释性的透明度和支持姑息治疗选择的临床决策。方法:使用来自40个设施的11,944名居民的数据,结合18个特征的新组合来开发预测模型,将Cox比例风险、Ridge和Lasso回归等标准方法与机器学习算法、梯度增强(GB)和随机生存森林(Random Survival Forest)进行比较。模型校正与ROC和一套评估指标一起进行,以分析结果。可解释的人工智能(XAI)工具被用来证明队列水平和患者水平的模型可解释性,以使模型的临床使用透明化。遵循TRIPOD报告指南,公开提供模型参数和代码。结果:GB表现最好,动态AUROC为0.746,6个月生存预测的一致性指数为0.716。可解释的人工智能工具提供了对合并症、认知障碍和营养状况等关键特征的见解,揭示了它们对生存结果的影响以及为临床决策提供信息的相互作用。校正后的模型表现出接近最佳的性能,具有可调节的临床相关阈值。事实证明,XAI工具的集成有效地提高了预测的透明度和可信度,提供了可操作的见解,支持老年护理环境中知情和道德负责的临终关怀(EoL)决策。结论:本研究成功地应用机器学习为老年护理居民创建了可行的生存模型,通过一套可解释的工具展示了它们在临床环境中的可用性。研究结果支持在老年医学中将机器学习与可解释的人工智能工具引入临床试验,用于预测死亡率,以提高EoL护理的质量,并就姑息治疗进行知情讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computer methods and programs in biomedicine
Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
6.60%
发文量
601
审稿时长
135 days
期刊介绍: To encourage the development of formal computing methods, and their application in biomedical research and medical practice, by illustration of fundamental principles in biomedical informatics research; to stimulate basic research into application software design; to report the state of research of biomedical information processing projects; to report new computer methodologies applied in biomedical areas; the eventual distribution of demonstrable software to avoid duplication of effort; to provide a forum for discussion and improvement of existing software; to optimize contact between national organizations and regional user groups by promoting an international exchange of information on formal methods, standards and software in biomedicine. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine covers computing methodology and software systems derived from computing science for implementation in all aspects of biomedical research and medical practice. It is designed to serve: biochemists; biologists; geneticists; immunologists; neuroscientists; pharmacologists; toxicologists; clinicians; epidemiologists; psychiatrists; psychologists; cardiologists; chemists; (radio)physicists; computer scientists; programmers and systems analysts; biomedical, clinical, electrical and other engineers; teachers of medical informatics and users of educational software.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning classification of normal and malignant cells on the basis of their viscoelastic properties Inhalation exposure and particle deposition across 16 nonhuman primate airway models using computational fluid–particle dynamics for allometric extrapolation Robust prediction of parameterized cardiovascular hemodynamics using deep operator networks with time normalization CRMIPred: Identifying the spatial interactions among cis-regulatory modules via considering their cross-attended epigenetic profiles A robust topology optimization based biomechanical computational framework for patient-specific trabecular bone microstructure reconstruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1