Deep learning framework for history matching CO2 storage with 4D seismic and monitoring well data

IF 4.6 0 ENERGY & FUELS Geoenergy Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.geoen.2025.213736
Nanzhe Wang, Louis J. Durlofsky
{"title":"Deep learning framework for history matching CO2 storage with 4D seismic and monitoring well data","authors":"Nanzhe Wang,&nbsp;Louis J. Durlofsky","doi":"10.1016/j.geoen.2025.213736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Geological carbon storage entails the injection of megatonnes of supercritical CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> into subsurface formations. The properties of these formations are usually highly uncertain, which makes design and optimization of large-scale storage operations challenging. In this paper we introduce a history matching strategy that enables the calibration of formation properties based on early-time observations. Early-time assessments are essential to assure the operation is performing as planned. Our framework involves two fit-for-purpose deep learning surrogate models that provide predictions for in-situ monitoring well data and interpreted time-lapse (4D) seismic saturation data. These two types of data are at very different scales of resolution, so it is appropriate to construct separate, specialized deep learning networks for their prediction. This approach results in a workflow that is more straightforward to design and more efficient to train than a single surrogate that provides global high-fidelity predictions. The deep learning models are integrated into a hierarchical Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) history matching procedure. History matching is performed on a synthetic case with and without 4D seismic data, which allows us to quantify the impact of 4D seismic on uncertainty reduction. The use of both data types is shown to provide substantial uncertainty reduction in key geomodel parameters and to enable accurate predictions of CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> plume dynamics. The overall history matching framework developed in this study represents an efficient way to integrate multiple data types and to assess the impact of each on uncertainty reduction and performance predictions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100578,"journal":{"name":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","volume":"248 ","pages":"Article 213736"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891025000946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geological carbon storage entails the injection of megatonnes of supercritical CO2 into subsurface formations. The properties of these formations are usually highly uncertain, which makes design and optimization of large-scale storage operations challenging. In this paper we introduce a history matching strategy that enables the calibration of formation properties based on early-time observations. Early-time assessments are essential to assure the operation is performing as planned. Our framework involves two fit-for-purpose deep learning surrogate models that provide predictions for in-situ monitoring well data and interpreted time-lapse (4D) seismic saturation data. These two types of data are at very different scales of resolution, so it is appropriate to construct separate, specialized deep learning networks for their prediction. This approach results in a workflow that is more straightforward to design and more efficient to train than a single surrogate that provides global high-fidelity predictions. The deep learning models are integrated into a hierarchical Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) history matching procedure. History matching is performed on a synthetic case with and without 4D seismic data, which allows us to quantify the impact of 4D seismic on uncertainty reduction. The use of both data types is shown to provide substantial uncertainty reduction in key geomodel parameters and to enable accurate predictions of CO2 plume dynamics. The overall history matching framework developed in this study represents an efficient way to integrate multiple data types and to assess the impact of each on uncertainty reduction and performance predictions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将二氧化碳储量与四维地震和监测井数据进行历史匹配的深度学习框架
地质碳储存需要向地下地层注入数百万吨的超临界二氧化碳。这些地层的性质通常是高度不确定的,这使得大规模存储操作的设计和优化具有挑战性。在本文中,我们介绍了一种历史匹配策略,该策略能够基于早期观测来校准地层属性。早期评估对于确保行动按计划进行至关重要。我们的框架包括两个适合用途的深度学习代理模型,为现场监测井数据和解释时移(4D)地震饱和度数据提供预测。这两种类型的数据在分辨率尺度上非常不同,因此构建单独的、专门的深度学习网络来预测它们是合适的。与提供全局高保真度预测的单个代理相比,这种方法产生的工作流设计起来更直接,训练起来也更有效。深度学习模型被集成到一个分层马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)历史匹配过程中。在有和没有四维地震数据的综合情况下进行历史匹配,这使我们能够量化四维地震对降低不确定性的影响。研究表明,使用这两种数据类型大大减少了关键地质模型参数的不确定性,并能够准确预测二氧化碳羽流动力学。本研究中开发的整体历史匹配框架代表了一种有效的方法来整合多种数据类型,并评估每种数据类型对不确定性减少和性能预测的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Probabilistic approach for static carbon storage capacity estimation: A case study on the VR014 depleted gas field in offshore Louisiana, USA Modeling fracture initiation pressure and tortuosity along perforations Low salinity water - engineered microsphere injection for in-depth conformance control in permeable carbonates: an experimental study Pillar safety analysis and layout optimization for hydrogen storage cavern groups in bedded salt formations — A study based on thermal-hydraulic-mechanical (THM) coupling Inference of pattern-based geological CO2 sequestration and oil recovery potential in a commingled main pay and residual oil zone CO2-EOR flood
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1