Anne-Marie Aubin MD , Liam McAuliffe MD , Kimberley Williams MD , Ashad Issah MD , Rosanna Diacci MD , Jack E. McAuliffe BSc , Salma Sabdia MD , Jason Phung MD , Carol A. Wang BSc(Hons) , Craig E. Pennell PhD
{"title":"Combined vaginal progesterone and cervical cerclage in the prevention of preterm birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Anne-Marie Aubin MD , Liam McAuliffe MD , Kimberley Williams MD , Ashad Issah MD , Rosanna Diacci MD , Jack E. McAuliffe BSc , Salma Sabdia MD , Jason Phung MD , Carol A. Wang BSc(Hons) , Craig E. Pennell PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vaginal progesterone and cervical cerclage are both effective interventions for reducing preterm birth (PTB). It is currently unclear whether combined therapy offers superior effectiveness compared to single therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the efficacy of combining cervical cerclage and vaginal progesterone in the prevention of PTB.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>We searched Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Library (Wiley) and Scopus (from their inception to 2020).</div></div><div><h3>Study eligibility criteria</h3><div>The review accepted randomized and pseudo-randomized control trials, non-randomized experimental control trials, and cohort studies. High risk patients (shortened cervical length <25mm or prior PTB) who were assigned cervical cerclage, vaginal progesterone, or both for the prevention of PTB were included. Only singleton pregnancies were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Study appraisal and synthesis methods</h3><div>The primary outcome was birth <37 weeks. Secondary outcomes included birth <28, <32 and <34 weeks, gestational age (GA) at delivery, days between intervention and delivery, preterm premature rupture of membranes, neonatal mortality, neonatal intensive care unit admission, intubation and birthweight. Following title and full-text screening, eight papers were included in the final analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias (ROBINS-I and RoB-2). Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE tool.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Combined therapy was associated with lower risk of PTB <37 weeks compared to progesterone alone (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58, 0.96). Compared to cerclage only, combined therapy was associated with less PTB <32 weeks, decreased neonatal mortality, increased GA and a longer interval between intervention and delivery. Compared to progesterone alone, combined therapy was associated with less PTB <32 weeks, less PTB<28 weeks, increased GA, decreased neonatal mortality and decreased neonatal intensive care unit admissions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Combined treatment of cervical cerclage and vaginal progesterone could potentially result in a greater reduction in PTB compared to single therapy. Further well-conducted and adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to assess these promising findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 101553"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589933324002799","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Vaginal progesterone and cervical cerclage are both effective interventions for reducing preterm birth (PTB). It is currently unclear whether combined therapy offers superior effectiveness compared to single therapy.
Objective
To determine the efficacy of combining cervical cerclage and vaginal progesterone in the prevention of PTB.
Data sources
We searched Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Library (Wiley) and Scopus (from their inception to 2020).
Study eligibility criteria
The review accepted randomized and pseudo-randomized control trials, non-randomized experimental control trials, and cohort studies. High risk patients (shortened cervical length <25mm or prior PTB) who were assigned cervical cerclage, vaginal progesterone, or both for the prevention of PTB were included. Only singleton pregnancies were assessed.
Study appraisal and synthesis methods
The primary outcome was birth <37 weeks. Secondary outcomes included birth <28, <32 and <34 weeks, gestational age (GA) at delivery, days between intervention and delivery, preterm premature rupture of membranes, neonatal mortality, neonatal intensive care unit admission, intubation and birthweight. Following title and full-text screening, eight papers were included in the final analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias (ROBINS-I and RoB-2). Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE tool.
Results
Combined therapy was associated with lower risk of PTB <37 weeks compared to progesterone alone (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58, 0.96). Compared to cerclage only, combined therapy was associated with less PTB <32 weeks, decreased neonatal mortality, increased GA and a longer interval between intervention and delivery. Compared to progesterone alone, combined therapy was associated with less PTB <32 weeks, less PTB<28 weeks, increased GA, decreased neonatal mortality and decreased neonatal intensive care unit admissions.
Conclusions
Combined treatment of cervical cerclage and vaginal progesterone could potentially result in a greater reduction in PTB compared to single therapy. Further well-conducted and adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to assess these promising findings.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including:
Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women.
Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health.
Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child.
Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby.
Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.