Combined vaginal progesterone and cervical cerclage in the prevention of preterm birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101553
Anne-Marie Aubin MD , Liam McAuliffe MD , Kimberley Williams MD , Ashad Issah MD , Rosanna Diacci MD , Jack E. McAuliffe BSc , Salma Sabdia MD , Jason Phung MD , Carol A. Wang BSc(Hons) , Craig E. Pennell PhD
{"title":"Combined vaginal progesterone and cervical cerclage in the prevention of preterm birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Anne-Marie Aubin MD ,&nbsp;Liam McAuliffe MD ,&nbsp;Kimberley Williams MD ,&nbsp;Ashad Issah MD ,&nbsp;Rosanna Diacci MD ,&nbsp;Jack E. McAuliffe BSc ,&nbsp;Salma Sabdia MD ,&nbsp;Jason Phung MD ,&nbsp;Carol A. Wang BSc(Hons) ,&nbsp;Craig E. Pennell PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vaginal progesterone and cervical cerclage are both effective interventions for reducing preterm birth (PTB). It is currently unclear whether combined therapy offers superior effectiveness compared to single therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the efficacy of combining cervical cerclage and vaginal progesterone in the prevention of PTB.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>We searched Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Library (Wiley) and Scopus (from their inception to 2020).</div></div><div><h3>Study eligibility criteria</h3><div>The review accepted randomized and pseudo-randomized control trials, non-randomized experimental control trials, and cohort studies. High risk patients (shortened cervical length &lt;25mm or prior PTB) who were assigned cervical cerclage, vaginal progesterone, or both for the prevention of PTB were included. Only singleton pregnancies were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Study appraisal and synthesis methods</h3><div>The primary outcome was birth &lt;37 weeks. Secondary outcomes included birth &lt;28, &lt;32 and &lt;34 weeks, gestational age (GA) at delivery, days between intervention and delivery, preterm premature rupture of membranes, neonatal mortality, neonatal intensive care unit admission, intubation and birthweight. Following title and full-text screening, eight papers were included in the final analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias (ROBINS-I and RoB-2). Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE tool.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Combined therapy was associated with lower risk of PTB &lt;37 weeks compared to progesterone alone (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58, 0.96). Compared to cerclage only, combined therapy was associated with less PTB &lt;32 weeks, decreased neonatal mortality, increased GA and a longer interval between intervention and delivery. Compared to progesterone alone, combined therapy was associated with less PTB &lt;32 weeks, less PTB&lt;28 weeks, increased GA, decreased neonatal mortality and decreased neonatal intensive care unit admissions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Combined treatment of cervical cerclage and vaginal progesterone could potentially result in a greater reduction in PTB compared to single therapy. Further well-conducted and adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to assess these promising findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 101553"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589933324002799","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Vaginal progesterone and cervical cerclage are both effective interventions for reducing preterm birth (PTB). It is currently unclear whether combined therapy offers superior effectiveness compared to single therapy.

Objective

To determine the efficacy of combining cervical cerclage and vaginal progesterone in the prevention of PTB.

Data sources

We searched Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Library (Wiley) and Scopus (from their inception to 2020).

Study eligibility criteria

The review accepted randomized and pseudo-randomized control trials, non-randomized experimental control trials, and cohort studies. High risk patients (shortened cervical length <25mm or prior PTB) who were assigned cervical cerclage, vaginal progesterone, or both for the prevention of PTB were included. Only singleton pregnancies were assessed.

Study appraisal and synthesis methods

The primary outcome was birth <37 weeks. Secondary outcomes included birth <28, <32 and <34 weeks, gestational age (GA) at delivery, days between intervention and delivery, preterm premature rupture of membranes, neonatal mortality, neonatal intensive care unit admission, intubation and birthweight. Following title and full-text screening, eight papers were included in the final analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias (ROBINS-I and RoB-2). Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE tool.

Results

Combined therapy was associated with lower risk of PTB <37 weeks compared to progesterone alone (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58, 0.96). Compared to cerclage only, combined therapy was associated with less PTB <32 weeks, decreased neonatal mortality, increased GA and a longer interval between intervention and delivery. Compared to progesterone alone, combined therapy was associated with less PTB <32 weeks, less PTB<28 weeks, increased GA, decreased neonatal mortality and decreased neonatal intensive care unit admissions.

Conclusions

Combined treatment of cervical cerclage and vaginal progesterone could potentially result in a greater reduction in PTB compared to single therapy. Further well-conducted and adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to assess these promising findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
254
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including: Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women. Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health. Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child. Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby. Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Incorporating Maternal-Fetal Medicine Physicians onto Labor and Delivery in Reducing Maternal Morbidity. Intrauterine vacuum and balloon tamponade devices have similar rates of postpartum hemorrhage control: a retrospective cohort study. Intravenous calcium during spinal anesthesia in preeclamptic women receiving magnesium therapy. Is it not Time to Propose a Maternal-Fetal Definition of Fetal Growth Restriction specifically Linked to Maternal Vascular Malperfusion of the Placenta. Letter to The Editor in response to "Oxytocin regimen used for induction of labor and pregnancy outcomes".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1