RDFS-TDC: Robust discriminant feature selection based on improved trace difference criterion

IF 6.8 1区 计算机科学 0 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Sciences Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2025.121940
Libo Yang , Dawei Zhu , Xuemei Liu , Feiping Nie
{"title":"RDFS-TDC: Robust discriminant feature selection based on improved trace difference criterion","authors":"Libo Yang ,&nbsp;Dawei Zhu ,&nbsp;Xuemei Liu ,&nbsp;Feiping Nie","doi":"10.1016/j.ins.2025.121940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Various discriminant feature selection models have been proposed that combine discriminant subspaces and sparse constraints. However, most scholars ignore the sensitivity of the discriminant criterion to outliers. In this study, we propose a robust discriminative feature selection method called RDFS-TDC. RDFS-TDC learns the optimal discriminative projection based on the trace-difference criterion, which provides good flexibility while avoiding singular matrices. Subsequently, the objective function was optimized using an iterative reweighting method, which reduced the impact of outliers on the discriminant subspace during the learning process. To satisfy different sparsity requirements, this study introduces the <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>L</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn><mo>,</mo><mi>p</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> norm constraint to impose row sparsity on the projection matrix. RDFS-TDC obtained 87.05%, 94.68%, 84.82%, and 89.60% accuracies on YaleB, COIL20, CMUPIE, and FERET, respectively, and the misclassification error rate was 0.01%-3.32% lower compared to other methods. In addition, RDFS-TDC performed better on datasets with different scenarios compared to SDFS, WDFS, Fisher Score, DLSR, ReliefF, and RFS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51063,"journal":{"name":"Information Sciences","volume":"705 ","pages":"Article 121940"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025525000726","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various discriminant feature selection models have been proposed that combine discriminant subspaces and sparse constraints. However, most scholars ignore the sensitivity of the discriminant criterion to outliers. In this study, we propose a robust discriminative feature selection method called RDFS-TDC. RDFS-TDC learns the optimal discriminative projection based on the trace-difference criterion, which provides good flexibility while avoiding singular matrices. Subsequently, the objective function was optimized using an iterative reweighting method, which reduced the impact of outliers on the discriminant subspace during the learning process. To satisfy different sparsity requirements, this study introduces the L2,p norm constraint to impose row sparsity on the projection matrix. RDFS-TDC obtained 87.05%, 94.68%, 84.82%, and 89.60% accuracies on YaleB, COIL20, CMUPIE, and FERET, respectively, and the misclassification error rate was 0.01%-3.32% lower compared to other methods. In addition, RDFS-TDC performed better on datasets with different scenarios compared to SDFS, WDFS, Fisher Score, DLSR, ReliefF, and RFS.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
RDFS-TDC:基于改进迹差准则的鲁棒判别特征选择
将判别子空间与稀疏约束相结合,提出了多种判别特征选择模型。然而,大多数学者忽略了判别准则对异常值的敏感性。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种鲁棒的判别特征选择方法,称为RDFS-TDC。RDFS-TDC学习基于迹差准则的最优判别投影,在避免奇异矩阵的同时提供了良好的灵活性。随后,采用迭代重加权方法对目标函数进行优化,减少了学习过程中异常值对判别子空间的影响。为了满足不同的稀疏性要求,本研究引入L2,p范数约束对投影矩阵施加行稀疏性。RDFS-TDC在YaleB、COIL20、cmpie和FERET上的准确率分别为87.05%、94.68%、84.82%和89.60%,误分类错误率比其他方法低0.01% ~ 3.32%。此外,与SDFS、WDFS、Fisher Score、DLSR、ReliefF和RFS相比,RDFS-TDC在不同场景的数据集上表现更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Sciences
Information Sciences 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
17.30%
发文量
1322
审稿时长
10.4 months
期刊介绍: Informatics and Computer Science Intelligent Systems Applications is an esteemed international journal that focuses on publishing original and creative research findings in the field of information sciences. We also feature a limited number of timely tutorial and surveying contributions. Our journal aims to cater to a diverse audience, including researchers, developers, managers, strategic planners, graduate students, and anyone interested in staying up-to-date with cutting-edge research in information science, knowledge engineering, and intelligent systems. While readers are expected to share a common interest in information science, they come from varying backgrounds such as engineering, mathematics, statistics, physics, computer science, cell biology, molecular biology, management science, cognitive science, neurobiology, behavioral sciences, and biochemistry.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Tensorized topological manifold for multiple kernel clustering LPCLNet: Leveraging local pixel-wise contrastive learning for image tampering localization UHTS-DRL: A deep reinforcement learning framework for integrated agile satellite observation and data transmission scheduling A framework for technological bottleneck detection and collaborative optimization in heterogeneous parallel networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1