Predicting the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatments: a systematic review and quality assessment of prediction models

F&S reviews Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.xfnr.2024.100086
Krishnika Vetrivel M.B.B.S. , Ayesha Salejee M.B.B.S. , Bheena Kharunyam M.B.B.S. , Hakim-Moulay Dehbi Ph.D. , Spiros Denaxas Ph.D. , Nicholas Freemantle Ph.D. , Bassel H. Al Wattar Ph.D.
{"title":"Predicting the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatments: a systematic review and quality assessment of prediction models","authors":"Krishnika Vetrivel M.B.B.S. ,&nbsp;Ayesha Salejee M.B.B.S. ,&nbsp;Bheena Kharunyam M.B.B.S. ,&nbsp;Hakim-Moulay Dehbi Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Spiros Denaxas Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Nicholas Freemantle Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Bassel H. Al Wattar Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfnr.2024.100086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Importance</h3><div>Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a common iatrogenic complication of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in assisted conception. OHSS can be life-threatening and associated with significant morbidity. Several measures could help prevent OHSS; however, accurate risk prediction remains a challenge to enable early prevention.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To review available prediction models for OHSS in women undergoing assisted conception and to identify the best-performing models for their accuracy, generalizability, and applicability.</div></div><div><h3>Evidence review</h3><div>We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL) until October 2023. We included studies reporting on the development or evaluation of models predicting the risk of OHSS outcomes before or during COS among women undergoing assisted conception. We reported on models’ discrimination, calibration, type of validation, and any implementation tools for clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>We screened 5,699 citations and included 14 observational cohort studies reporting on 14 prediction models. The median sample size was 782 participants (range 105–256,381), and the majority of models were developed using logistic regression (13/14, 92.9%). The commonest predictor was maternal age (7/14, 50.0%), followed by number of antral and mature follicles (6/14, 42.9%). Six models were internally validated (6/14, 42.9%), and none were externally validated. Only one model had an implementation platform as a smartphone-based application (1/14, 7.1%). Most of the included studies had an unclear risk of bias (7/14, 50.0%), and only three studies were at low risk (3/13, 21.4%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and relevance</h3><div>There are no clinically appropriate and validated prediction models for OHSS among women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation. More research is needed to improve their generalizability and applicability into clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>PROSPERO</h3><div>CRD42024509423</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73011,"journal":{"name":"F&S reviews","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100086"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F&S reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666571924000434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a common iatrogenic complication of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in assisted conception. OHSS can be life-threatening and associated with significant morbidity. Several measures could help prevent OHSS; however, accurate risk prediction remains a challenge to enable early prevention.

Objective

To review available prediction models for OHSS in women undergoing assisted conception and to identify the best-performing models for their accuracy, generalizability, and applicability.

Evidence review

We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL) until October 2023. We included studies reporting on the development or evaluation of models predicting the risk of OHSS outcomes before or during COS among women undergoing assisted conception. We reported on models’ discrimination, calibration, type of validation, and any implementation tools for clinical practice.

Findings

We screened 5,699 citations and included 14 observational cohort studies reporting on 14 prediction models. The median sample size was 782 participants (range 105–256,381), and the majority of models were developed using logistic regression (13/14, 92.9%). The commonest predictor was maternal age (7/14, 50.0%), followed by number of antral and mature follicles (6/14, 42.9%). Six models were internally validated (6/14, 42.9%), and none were externally validated. Only one model had an implementation platform as a smartphone-based application (1/14, 7.1%). Most of the included studies had an unclear risk of bias (7/14, 50.0%), and only three studies were at low risk (3/13, 21.4%).

Conclusion and relevance

There are no clinically appropriate and validated prediction models for OHSS among women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation. More research is needed to improve their generalizability and applicability into clinical practice.

PROSPERO

CRD42024509423
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测接受辅助生殖技术治疗的妇女卵巢过度刺激综合征的风险:预测模型的系统回顾和质量评估
卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)是辅助受孕控制性卵巢刺激(COS)常见的医源性并发症。OHSS可能危及生命,并伴有显著的发病率。有几项措施可以帮助预防OHSS;然而,准确的风险预测仍然是实现早期预防的一个挑战。目的回顾现有的辅助受孕女性OHSS预测模型,并从其准确性、普遍性和适用性方面确定最佳模型。我们检索了电子数据库(MEDLINE, EMBASE和CENTRAL),直到2023年10月。我们纳入了关于辅助受孕妇女COS前或COS期间OHSS风险预测模型开发或评估的研究报告。我们报告了模型的区分、校准、验证类型和任何临床实践的实施工具。研究结果:我们筛选了5699篇引用,纳入了14篇观察性队列研究,报告了14个预测模型。中位样本量为782名参与者(范围105-256,381),大多数模型采用逻辑回归(13/14,92.9%)。最常见的预测因子是母亲年龄(7/14,50.0%),其次是窦泡和成熟卵泡数量(6/14,42.9%)。6个模型被内部验证(6/14,42.9%),没有模型被外部验证。只有一个模型具有基于智能手机的应用程序的实现平台(1/14,7.1%)。大多数纳入的研究偏倚风险不明确(7/14,50.0%),只有3项研究为低风险(3/13,21.4%)。结论及相关性对于接受卵巢控制性刺激的女性,尚无临床合适且有效的预测模型。需要更多的研究来提高它们在临床实践中的普遍性和适用性。PROSPEROCRD42024509423
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
F&S reviews
F&S reviews Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Urology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
61 days
期刊最新文献
Somatic mutations in histologically normal human uterine endometrium: a narrative review Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances exposure from preconception to lactation: implications for female fertility, pregnancy complications, and birth outcomes: a narrative review An updated systematic review of fertility preservation options in individuals with Turner syndrome Immunocompetent mouse models of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Blastocyst development in assisted reproductive technologies: a narrative review evaluating its role as a surrogate marker for pregnancy outcomes and live birth success
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1