Wind, PV, and Hybrid Power Plant Operation in Competitive Nordic Electricity Market With High Profit Cannibalization

IF 4.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS International Journal of Energy Research Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1155/er/8850556
Simeon Seppälä, Sanna Syri
{"title":"Wind, PV, and Hybrid Power Plant Operation in Competitive Nordic Electricity Market With High Profit Cannibalization","authors":"Simeon Seppälä,&nbsp;Sanna Syri","doi":"10.1155/er/8850556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>This study presents a technoeconomic analysis of a hybrid wind-PV (photovoltaic) power plant (HPP) compared to onshore wind power plants (WPPs) and photovoltaic power plants (PVPPs) in the Nordic electricity market, focusing on locations in Finland and Sweden. Wind power capacity has recently increased significantly in the Nordics, increasing the profit cannibalization of wind power. Renewable energy subsidies have been phased out in Finland and Sweden, thus new wind and PV power value creation is formed from the power market. The PV power capacity has also encountered significant growth in the Nordics. However, the capacity is still relatively low, allowing more revenue for produced PV power compared to wind power. The lower PV power profit cannibalization has increased interest in HPPs instead of WPPs. This contribution studies the economic feasibility of wind and PV power in changing market conditions in the Nordic electricity market. The market operation is modeled with three different configurations including selling all the power into the day ahead spot market and baseload or pay-as-produced power purchase agreement (PPA). In addition, a battery energy storage system (BESS) investment is analyzed using the operating strategy of shifting production to more profitable spot price hours. This study shows that due to the profit cannibalization and high cost of capital, the power plants are currently not profitable in the Nordic electricity market except when the bidding area has high average spot prices. The worst profitability was with WPPs when exposed to the market shape risk and with PVPPs when pay-as-produced PPA was agreed upon due to the higher levelized cost of electricity. However, the PV power profit cannibalization is expected to increase in the future as more PVPPs operate in the Nordic power market. Thus, the PVPP shape risk may increase in the future as well.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Energy Research","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/er/8850556","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Energy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/er/8850556","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a technoeconomic analysis of a hybrid wind-PV (photovoltaic) power plant (HPP) compared to onshore wind power plants (WPPs) and photovoltaic power plants (PVPPs) in the Nordic electricity market, focusing on locations in Finland and Sweden. Wind power capacity has recently increased significantly in the Nordics, increasing the profit cannibalization of wind power. Renewable energy subsidies have been phased out in Finland and Sweden, thus new wind and PV power value creation is formed from the power market. The PV power capacity has also encountered significant growth in the Nordics. However, the capacity is still relatively low, allowing more revenue for produced PV power compared to wind power. The lower PV power profit cannibalization has increased interest in HPPs instead of WPPs. This contribution studies the economic feasibility of wind and PV power in changing market conditions in the Nordic electricity market. The market operation is modeled with three different configurations including selling all the power into the day ahead spot market and baseload or pay-as-produced power purchase agreement (PPA). In addition, a battery energy storage system (BESS) investment is analyzed using the operating strategy of shifting production to more profitable spot price hours. This study shows that due to the profit cannibalization and high cost of capital, the power plants are currently not profitable in the Nordic electricity market except when the bidding area has high average spot prices. The worst profitability was with WPPs when exposed to the market shape risk and with PVPPs when pay-as-produced PPA was agreed upon due to the higher levelized cost of electricity. However, the PV power profit cannibalization is expected to increase in the future as more PVPPs operate in the Nordic power market. Thus, the PVPP shape risk may increase in the future as well.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在竞争激烈的北欧电力市场中,风电、光伏和混合电厂的运营与高利润的相互蚕食
本研究以芬兰和瑞典为研究对象,对北欧电力市场上的混合风能-光伏(光伏)发电厂(HPP)与陆上风力发电厂(WPPs)和光伏发电厂(PVPPs)进行了技术经济分析。最近,北欧国家的风力发电能力显著增加,增加了风力发电的利润。芬兰和瑞典已经逐步取消了可再生能源补贴,从而从电力市场形成了新的风能和光伏发电价值创造。北欧国家的光伏发电能力也出现了显著增长。然而,容量仍然相对较低,与风电相比,光伏发电的收入更高。较低的光伏发电利润蚕食增加了对HPPs而不是WPPs的兴趣。该贡献研究了北欧电力市场不断变化的市场条件下风能和光伏发电的经济可行性。市场运行模型采用三种不同的配置,包括将所有电力出售到日前现货市场和基本负荷或按产付费购电协议(PPA)。此外,采用将生产转移到更有利可图的现货价格小时的运营策略,对电池储能系统(BESS)的投资进行了分析。本研究表明,由于利润蚕食和高资金成本,除了投标地区的平均现货价格较高外,发电厂目前在北欧电力市场上是不盈利的。当面临市场形态风险时,wpp的盈利能力最差,而当PPA因电力成本较高而达成按产付费协议时,pv的盈利能力最差。然而,随着更多的光伏电站在北欧电力市场上运营,预计未来光伏发电的利润将会增加。因此,PVPP形状的风险在未来也可能增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Energy Research
International Journal of Energy Research 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1170
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Energy Research (IJER) is dedicated to providing a multidisciplinary, unique platform for researchers, scientists, engineers, technology developers, planners, and policy makers to present their research results and findings in a compelling manner on novel energy systems and applications. IJER covers the entire spectrum of energy from production to conversion, conservation, management, systems, technologies, etc. We encourage papers submissions aiming at better efficiency, cost improvements, more effective resource use, improved design and analysis, reduced environmental impact, and hence leading to better sustainability. IJER is concerned with the development and exploitation of both advanced traditional and new energy sources, systems, technologies and applications. Interdisciplinary subjects in the area of novel energy systems and applications are also encouraged. High-quality research papers are solicited in, but are not limited to, the following areas with innovative and novel contents: -Biofuels and alternatives -Carbon capturing and storage technologies -Clean coal technologies -Energy conversion, conservation and management -Energy storage -Energy systems -Hybrid/combined/integrated energy systems for multi-generation -Hydrogen energy and fuel cells -Hydrogen production technologies -Micro- and nano-energy systems and technologies -Nuclear energy -Renewable energies (e.g. geothermal, solar, wind, hydro, tidal, wave, biomass) -Smart energy system
期刊最新文献
Numerical Study on Thermal Performance of Microencapsulated PCM-Integrated Concrete Blocks Artificial Neural Network-Based Optimization of Anaerobic Digestion in Municipal Wastewater Treatment Energy Transport Analysis of Bioconvective Magnetized Micropolar Fluid Flow Over a Porous Curved Stretching Surface With Homogeneous–Heterogeneous Reactions Implementation of New Single Phase Multilevel Inverter Technology With Reduced Number of Switches for PV Grid Study on Chemical Kinetic Mechanism of Methanol/Ammonia/n-Heptane for Engine Combustion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1