Bridging the knowledge gap: Mapping carbon emissions to food items facilitates choices of plant-based over animal-based items

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Appetite Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2025.107910
Romain Cadario , Yi Li , Anne-Kathrin Klesse
{"title":"Bridging the knowledge gap: Mapping carbon emissions to food items facilitates choices of plant-based over animal-based items","authors":"Romain Cadario ,&nbsp;Yi Li ,&nbsp;Anne-Kathrin Klesse","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.107910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Consumers generally underestimate the difference in GHG emissions between animal-based and plant-based items. Existing carbon labels primarily focus on enhancing metric knowledge (i.e., the general GHG emission levels of a food product) yet neglect to improve mapping knowledge (i.e., the relative differences between different food items). This research proposes the “item mapping” carbon labeling strategy, designed to link GHG emissions to food items (i.e., animal-vs. plant-based). Five pre-registered experiments document that the item mapping label (i) reduces the knowledge gap in GHG emissions between animal-versus plant-based food items and (ii) reduces animal-based food choices. The item mapping label is particularly effective at decreasing animal-based food choices for consumers with higher sustainable eating involvement, which is associated with higher knowledge overconfidence (i.e., consumers believe that they know more than they actually do). These findings offer insights into designing carbon labels that facilitate sustainable food choices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 107910"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325000637","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consumers generally underestimate the difference in GHG emissions between animal-based and plant-based items. Existing carbon labels primarily focus on enhancing metric knowledge (i.e., the general GHG emission levels of a food product) yet neglect to improve mapping knowledge (i.e., the relative differences between different food items). This research proposes the “item mapping” carbon labeling strategy, designed to link GHG emissions to food items (i.e., animal-vs. plant-based). Five pre-registered experiments document that the item mapping label (i) reduces the knowledge gap in GHG emissions between animal-versus plant-based food items and (ii) reduces animal-based food choices. The item mapping label is particularly effective at decreasing animal-based food choices for consumers with higher sustainable eating involvement, which is associated with higher knowledge overconfidence (i.e., consumers believe that they know more than they actually do). These findings offer insights into designing carbon labels that facilitate sustainable food choices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弥合知识鸿沟:将碳排放映射到食品中有助于选择植物性食品而不是动物性食品。
消费者通常低估了动物性和植物性产品在温室气体排放方面的差异。现有的碳标签主要侧重于提高度量知识(即食品的一般温室气体排放水平),而忽视了提高制图知识(即不同食品之间的相对差异)。这项研究提出了“项目映射”碳标签策略,旨在将温室气体排放与食品(即动物与植物)联系起来。五项预先注册的实验证明,项目映射标签(i)减少了动物性食品与植物性食品之间在温室气体排放方面的知识差距,(ii)减少了动物性食品的选择。项目地图标签在减少可持续饮食参与度较高的消费者的动物性食品选择方面特别有效,这与较高的知识过度自信(即消费者认为他们知道的比实际知道的多)有关。这些发现为设计促进可持续食品选择的碳标签提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
期刊最新文献
Children's expectations about how others share food preferences and health-related information The impact of the Eco-Score and the co-presence of Nutri-Score on sustainable food identification by consumers. Understanding the Barriers to Plant-Based Dietary Change: The Role of Meat-Centric Meal Perception Among Adults in Australia and Denmark. A license to eat meat? Exploring processes underlying the effect of animal labels on meat consumption Consumer acceptance of different protein sources for meat alternatives: A multinational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1