Evaluating a whole-school approach to addressing gender-based violence in Scottish secondary schools (Equally Safe at School): a study protocol for a type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096596
Claire Hamilton, Ruth Lewis, Carolyn Blake, Anthony Purvis, Caroline Vaczy, Manuela Deidda, Niamh Kerr, Lisa Waiting, Kathryn Dawson, Malachi Willis, Emma McIntosh, Rod S Taylor, Laurence Moore, Kirstin R Mitchell
{"title":"Evaluating a whole-school approach to addressing gender-based violence in Scottish secondary schools (Equally Safe at School): a study protocol for a type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.","authors":"Claire Hamilton, Ruth Lewis, Carolyn Blake, Anthony Purvis, Caroline Vaczy, Manuela Deidda, Niamh Kerr, Lisa Waiting, Kathryn Dawson, Malachi Willis, Emma McIntosh, Rod S Taylor, Laurence Moore, Kirstin R Mitchell","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Equally Safe at School (ESAS) is a whole-school intervention to reduce gender-based violence (GBV) in secondary school. ESAS comprises self-assessment, student-led action group, two-tier staff training, curriculum enhancement and policy review. Schools set up key activities in Year 1 and embed them in Year 2. GBV, including sexual harassment, is common in secondary schools and disproportionately affects young women and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer youth.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>We will evaluate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, mechanisms of action and implementation of ESAS. We will recruit 36 schools across Scotland. The evaluation comprises three linked studies:Study 1: Pragmatic cluster randomised trial with 1:1 school allocation to either immediate ESAS intervention start (intervention schools) or 12-month delayed intervention start (control schools). Our primary outcome of student experience of sexual harassment will be measured at 12 months post-randomisation. Analysis of primary and secondary outcomes (student and school level) will be conducted on an intention to treat (ITT) basis comparing schools according to their original allocation.Study 2: Mixed-methods evaluation. Study 2A: Longitudinal follow-up will assess primary, secondary and intermediate outcomes at baseline, 12 months and 24 months of follow-up. Study 2B: Systems and realist-informed process evaluation will assess intervention and control school context, fidelity, dose and reach, acceptability and actor response, and how this varies by school and students. We will also assess implementation processes and mechanisms of action (beneficial or harmful), including if and how change is embedded over time, and if and how ESAS helps schools leverage other assets and resources.Study 3: Economic evaluation to assess the within-trial and longer term cost-effectiveness of ESAS.The methods include surveys in three out of six year groups (Years 2, 4 and 6) in all schools (baseline, 12 months and 24 months of follow-up); interviews with staff, students and other stakeholders; activity observations; brief surveys with key actors and analysis of trial documentation.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethical approval by University of Glasgow MVLS Ethics Committee (200220268). Findings will be disseminated via multiple channels to researchers, GBV and education sector stakeholders, study participants and the public.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ISRCTN29792495.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 2","pages":"e096596"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831264/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096596","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Equally Safe at School (ESAS) is a whole-school intervention to reduce gender-based violence (GBV) in secondary school. ESAS comprises self-assessment, student-led action group, two-tier staff training, curriculum enhancement and policy review. Schools set up key activities in Year 1 and embed them in Year 2. GBV, including sexual harassment, is common in secondary schools and disproportionately affects young women and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer youth.

Methods and analysis: We will evaluate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, mechanisms of action and implementation of ESAS. We will recruit 36 schools across Scotland. The evaluation comprises three linked studies:Study 1: Pragmatic cluster randomised trial with 1:1 school allocation to either immediate ESAS intervention start (intervention schools) or 12-month delayed intervention start (control schools). Our primary outcome of student experience of sexual harassment will be measured at 12 months post-randomisation. Analysis of primary and secondary outcomes (student and school level) will be conducted on an intention to treat (ITT) basis comparing schools according to their original allocation.Study 2: Mixed-methods evaluation. Study 2A: Longitudinal follow-up will assess primary, secondary and intermediate outcomes at baseline, 12 months and 24 months of follow-up. Study 2B: Systems and realist-informed process evaluation will assess intervention and control school context, fidelity, dose and reach, acceptability and actor response, and how this varies by school and students. We will also assess implementation processes and mechanisms of action (beneficial or harmful), including if and how change is embedded over time, and if and how ESAS helps schools leverage other assets and resources.Study 3: Economic evaluation to assess the within-trial and longer term cost-effectiveness of ESAS.The methods include surveys in three out of six year groups (Years 2, 4 and 6) in all schools (baseline, 12 months and 24 months of follow-up); interviews with staff, students and other stakeholders; activity observations; brief surveys with key actors and analysis of trial documentation.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval by University of Glasgow MVLS Ethics Committee (200220268). Findings will be disseminated via multiple channels to researchers, GBV and education sector stakeholders, study participants and the public.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN29792495.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估苏格兰中学解决基于性别的暴力的全校方法(学校同样安全):I型混合有效性-实施试验的研究方案。
简介:学校同等安全(ESAS)是一项全校干预措施,旨在减少中学中的性别暴力(GBV)。ESAS包括自我评估、学生领导的行动小组、两级员工培训、课程改进和政策检讨。学校在一年级设置重点活动,并将其嵌入二年级。性别暴力,包括性骚扰,在中学很常见,对年轻女性、女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人和酷儿青年的影响尤为严重。方法与分析:我们将评估ESAS的有效性、成本效益、行动机制和实施情况。我们将在苏格兰招募36所学校。评估包括三个相关的研究:研究1:实用集群随机试验,将1:1的学校分配到立即开始ESAS干预(干预学校)或12个月后开始干预(对照学校)。我们的学生性骚扰经历的主要结果将在随机化后的12个月进行测量。小学和中学结果(学生和学校水平)的分析将在意向治疗(ITT)的基础上进行,比较学校根据其原始分配。研究2:混合方法评价。研究2A:纵向随访将评估基线、12个月和24个月随访时的主要、次要和中期结果。研究2B:系统和现实知情的过程评估将评估干预和控制学校背景、保真度、剂量和范围、可接受性和行动者反应,以及这在学校和学生之间的差异。我们还将评估实施过程和行动机制(有益或有害),包括变革是否以及如何随着时间的推移而嵌入,以及ESAS是否以及如何帮助学校利用其他资产和资源。研究3:经济评价以评估ESAS的试验内和长期成本效益。方法包括对所有学校6年级中的3个组(2年级、4年级和6年级)进行调查(基线、12个月和24个月的随访);与员工、学生和其他利益相关者进行访谈;活动的观察;与主要参与者进行简短调查并分析审判文件。伦理与传播:格拉斯哥大学MVLS伦理委员会(200220268)伦理批准。研究结果将通过多种渠道传播给研究人员、性别暴力和教育部门利益相关者、研究参与者和公众。试验注册号:ISRCTN29792495。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Association between epidural analgesia experience and future fertility intention in China: a national cross-sectional study. Acute Rheumatic Fever Diagnostic Network (ARC Network) clinical recruitment protocol. Prevalence of anxiety, depression and stress symptoms among doctors in COVID-19 treatment units: a cross-sectional study in Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka. Prevalence and predictors of diabetes distress in Volta Region, Ghana: a health facility-based cross-sectional study. Becoming a coresearcher in dementia care research: a mixed-methods study protocol for evaluation of the Dementia Leaders programme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1