Harnessing coaches' expertise: creating 11 sport-specific profiles for talent orientation.

IF 2.6 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2025-01-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2025.1432903
Johanna Ochs, Andreas Hohmann, Johan Pion
{"title":"Harnessing coaches' expertise: creating 11 sport-specific profiles for talent orientation.","authors":"Johanna Ochs, Andreas Hohmann, Johan Pion","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2025.1432903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In Germany, there is no systematic approach to talent orientation that recommends an appropriate sport for children. Talent detection is the first step of the talent process, in which children's motor profiles are assessed using standardized test batteries. In the second step, talent orientation, these profiles are weighted with sport profiles to derive sport recommendations for each child. But how are these sport profiles built? The aim of this study is to engage coaches in the creation of sport profiles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>German coaches (<i>n</i> = 256) of gymnastics, handball, judo, soccer, swimming, table tennis, tennis, track & field participated in a survey using the German Motor Test 6-18 plus ball throwing and agility test. Eight sports were included. Judo was divided into light and heavy weight categories, and track & field into endurance running, sprinting/jumping, and throwing, resulting in eleven disciplines. Each discipline had a separate standardized questionnaire, with judo categories combined into one.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show individual profiles of relevant characteristics for each sport discipline. ANOVA and z-transformed means revealed different ratings of the test items, enabling the development of specific combinations of the most important test items for each discipline. The validity of these sport discipline-specific profiles was tested using discriminant analyses, which assigned coaches to their respective sport discipline. A linear discriminant analysis correctly classified 78.1% of coaches to their respective sport discipline. When comparing one sport discipline to all others, correct classification ranged from 82.2% to 92.7%.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Based on the coaches' ratings, eleven different sport discipline profiles were developed, each with its own combination of key test items. Track & field sprinting/jumping was most clearly distinguished from other disciplines. Overlaps were found in the profiles of handball and tennis, as well as judo and swimming. These findings help coaches utilize the profiles for talent orientation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"7 ","pages":"1432903"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825760/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1432903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In Germany, there is no systematic approach to talent orientation that recommends an appropriate sport for children. Talent detection is the first step of the talent process, in which children's motor profiles are assessed using standardized test batteries. In the second step, talent orientation, these profiles are weighted with sport profiles to derive sport recommendations for each child. But how are these sport profiles built? The aim of this study is to engage coaches in the creation of sport profiles.

Methods: German coaches (n = 256) of gymnastics, handball, judo, soccer, swimming, table tennis, tennis, track & field participated in a survey using the German Motor Test 6-18 plus ball throwing and agility test. Eight sports were included. Judo was divided into light and heavy weight categories, and track & field into endurance running, sprinting/jumping, and throwing, resulting in eleven disciplines. Each discipline had a separate standardized questionnaire, with judo categories combined into one.

Results: The results show individual profiles of relevant characteristics for each sport discipline. ANOVA and z-transformed means revealed different ratings of the test items, enabling the development of specific combinations of the most important test items for each discipline. The validity of these sport discipline-specific profiles was tested using discriminant analyses, which assigned coaches to their respective sport discipline. A linear discriminant analysis correctly classified 78.1% of coaches to their respective sport discipline. When comparing one sport discipline to all others, correct classification ranged from 82.2% to 92.7%.

Discussion: Based on the coaches' ratings, eleven different sport discipline profiles were developed, each with its own combination of key test items. Track & field sprinting/jumping was most clearly distinguished from other disciplines. Overlaps were found in the profiles of handball and tennis, as well as judo and swimming. These findings help coaches utilize the profiles for talent orientation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用教练的专业知识:为人才导向创建11个体育专项档案。
简介:在德国,没有系统的人才导向方法来推荐适合儿童的运动。天赋检测是天赋过程的第一步,在这个过程中,孩子们的运动轮廓是用标准化的测试电池来评估的。在第二步,天赋定位,这些档案与运动档案加权,得出每个孩子的运动建议。但这些运动档案是如何建立的呢?本研究的目的是让教练参与到运动档案的创建中来。方法:采用德国体操、手球、柔道、足球、游泳、乒乓球、网球、田径等项目的教练员(256名),采用德国运动测试6-18 +抛球和敏捷性测试进行问卷调查。其中包括8项运动。柔道分为轻量级和重型,田径分为耐力跑、短跑/跳远和投掷,共十一个项目。每个学科都有一个单独的标准化问卷,柔道类别合并为一个。结果:结果显示了各运动学科相关特征的个体概况。方差分析和z变换的均值揭示了测试项目的不同评级,从而能够为每个学科开发最重要的测试项目的特定组合。这些特定运动学科概况的有效性使用判别分析进行了测试,该分析将教练员分配到各自的运动学科。线性判别分析正确地将78.1%的教练员归入各自的运动学科。当将一个体育学科与所有其他学科进行比较时,正确的分类范围从82.2%到92.7%。讨论:根据教练的评分,开发了11种不同的运动学科概况,每种都有自己的关键测试项目组合。田径短跑/跳远与其他项目的区别最为明显。手球、网球、柔道和游泳的数据中也发现了重叠。这些发现有助于教练利用这些档案进行人才定位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
When feelings matter: moderating role of affective attitude on cognitive attitude and adolescents' out-of-school physical activity. Editorial: Optimizing performance and injury prevention in combat sports and martial arts: methodologies for control and monitoring. Enhancing reactive strength index through braking-phase focused verbal instruction. Comparison of the methods for detecting lower limb asymmetries: isokinetic dynamometry vs. tensiomyography derived indices. Mediating effects of physical activity enjoyment on physical activity levels in adults with cystic fibrosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1