Improved outcomes of endoscopic treatment for delayed perforation following endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-01-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2451-7835
Daiki Kitagawa, Noriya Uedo, Noboru Hanaoka, Takashi Kanesaka, Yasuhiro Tani, Yuki Okubo, Yuya Asada, Tomoya Ueda, Atsuko Kizawa, Takehiro Ninomiya, Yoshiaki Ando, Gentaro Tanabe, Yuta Fujimoto, Mori Hitoshi, Minoru Kato, Shunsuke Yoshii, Satoki Shichijo, Sachiko Yamamoto, Koji Higashino, Tomoki Michida, Ryu Ishihara, Yasuhiro Fujiwara
{"title":"Improved outcomes of endoscopic treatment for delayed perforation following endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms.","authors":"Daiki Kitagawa, Noriya Uedo, Noboru Hanaoka, Takashi Kanesaka, Yasuhiro Tani, Yuki Okubo, Yuya Asada, Tomoya Ueda, Atsuko Kizawa, Takehiro Ninomiya, Yoshiaki Ando, Gentaro Tanabe, Yuta Fujimoto, Mori Hitoshi, Minoru Kato, Shunsuke Yoshii, Satoki Shichijo, Sachiko Yamamoto, Koji Higashino, Tomoki Michida, Ryu Ishihara, Yasuhiro Fujiwara","doi":"10.1055/a-2451-7835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Emergency surgery is usually required for patients with delayed perforation after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); however, cases of successful endoscopic treatment recently have been reported. Here, we elucidated the usefulness of endoscopic intervention for patients with delayed perforation.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent gastric ESD from 2005 to 2022 were assessed for eligibility. Delayed perforation was defined as no intraprocedural perforation after the ESD but subsequent development of peritoneal irritation and free air on computed tomography scan. Participants were divided into early- and late-period groups based on time (October 2015) of implementation of the polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheet and the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) in clinical practice. We evaluated changes in incidence of required surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 5,048 patients who underwent gastric ESD, delayed perforation occurred in 28 patients (0.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4%-0.8%). Incidence of delayed perforation did not differ significantly between the early- and late-period groups (0.5% vs. 0.6%). The proportion of patients who underwent surgery was significantly smaller in the late-period group than in the early-period group (54% vs. 13%, odds ratio [OR] 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.83; <i>P</i> = 0.042); this was confirmed by multivariate analysis (adjusted OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.002-0.9; <i>P</i> = 0.043) after adjustment for age, sex, Charlson's comorbidity index, tumor location, and size.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic intervention using PGA sheets and OTSC was associated with a low incidence of required surgery for delayed perforation after gastric ESD and is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a24517835"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2451-7835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims: Emergency surgery is usually required for patients with delayed perforation after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); however, cases of successful endoscopic treatment recently have been reported. Here, we elucidated the usefulness of endoscopic intervention for patients with delayed perforation.

Patients and methods: Patients who underwent gastric ESD from 2005 to 2022 were assessed for eligibility. Delayed perforation was defined as no intraprocedural perforation after the ESD but subsequent development of peritoneal irritation and free air on computed tomography scan. Participants were divided into early- and late-period groups based on time (October 2015) of implementation of the polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheet and the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) in clinical practice. We evaluated changes in incidence of required surgery.

Results: Among the 5,048 patients who underwent gastric ESD, delayed perforation occurred in 28 patients (0.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4%-0.8%). Incidence of delayed perforation did not differ significantly between the early- and late-period groups (0.5% vs. 0.6%). The proportion of patients who underwent surgery was significantly smaller in the late-period group than in the early-period group (54% vs. 13%, odds ratio [OR] 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.83; P = 0.042); this was confirmed by multivariate analysis (adjusted OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.002-0.9; P = 0.043) after adjustment for age, sex, Charlson's comorbidity index, tumor location, and size.

Conclusions: Endoscopic intervention using PGA sheets and OTSC was associated with a low incidence of required surgery for delayed perforation after gastric ESD and is recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
期刊最新文献
Over-the-scope clips vs standard endoscopic interventions for first-line treatment of NVUGI bleeding: Meta-analysis of randomized trials. Pull-through endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure therapy for complicated leaks of the gastrointestinal tract: Novel technique. Endoscopic hemostasis with a self-expandable metal stent as bridge therapy for hemobilia. On-site ERCP availability and cholangitis outcomes: Retrospective cohort study. Endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia using blue light imaging in a low-risk population: Multicenter cross-sectional validation study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1