Successful strategies that address gender-related barriers and promote bodily autonomy within efforts to scale up and sustain postpregnancy contraception: a scoping review.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMJ Global Health Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016638
Arachu Castro, Rita Kabra, Anna Coates, James Kiarie
{"title":"Successful strategies that address gender-related barriers and promote bodily autonomy within efforts to scale up and sustain postpregnancy contraception: a scoping review.","authors":"Arachu Castro, Rita Kabra, Anna Coates, James Kiarie","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acknowledging the integral role of bodily autonomy in advancing gender equality, our study aimed to assess the extent to which strategies used in postpartum and postabortion contraception have effectively equipped women, girls and gender-diverse individuals with the tools, knowledge and resources required to make autonomous decisions that align with their diverse life experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review using the databases PubMed, EBSCOhost, EMBASE and SciSpace. We included implementation, evaluation and experimental studies published in any language between 2013 and 2023 and excluded studies not meeting these criteria. We used a WHO scale to determine the level of gender responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 30 implementation, evaluation and experimental studies published in any language between 2013 and 2023. We categorised the strategies following the WHO scale as gender-transformative (4 studies), gender-specific (24 studies) and gender-sensitive (2 studies). None of the studies reported strategies hindering reproductive health and rights. All strategies involved women and girls, and none explicitly targeted gender-diverse people capable of childbearing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the importance of integrating gender-transformative activities into postpregnancy contraceptive strategies and underscores the necessity of understanding and addressing local gender norms and the broader health system context to promote bodily autonomy effectively. The findings suggest that success should not be solely measured by contraceptive uptake but also by how well interventions address gender-related barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016638","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acknowledging the integral role of bodily autonomy in advancing gender equality, our study aimed to assess the extent to which strategies used in postpartum and postabortion contraception have effectively equipped women, girls and gender-diverse individuals with the tools, knowledge and resources required to make autonomous decisions that align with their diverse life experiences.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review using the databases PubMed, EBSCOhost, EMBASE and SciSpace. We included implementation, evaluation and experimental studies published in any language between 2013 and 2023 and excluded studies not meeting these criteria. We used a WHO scale to determine the level of gender responsiveness.

Results: We found 30 implementation, evaluation and experimental studies published in any language between 2013 and 2023. We categorised the strategies following the WHO scale as gender-transformative (4 studies), gender-specific (24 studies) and gender-sensitive (2 studies). None of the studies reported strategies hindering reproductive health and rights. All strategies involved women and girls, and none explicitly targeted gender-diverse people capable of childbearing.

Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of integrating gender-transformative activities into postpregnancy contraceptive strategies and underscores the necessity of understanding and addressing local gender norms and the broader health system context to promote bodily autonomy effectively. The findings suggest that success should not be solely measured by contraceptive uptake but also by how well interventions address gender-related barriers.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在扩大和维持妊娠后避孕的努力中解决与性别有关的障碍和促进身体自主的成功战略:范围审查。
引言:我们认识到身体自主在促进性别平等中不可或缺的作用,我们的研究旨在评估产后和流产后避孕策略在多大程度上有效地为妇女、女孩和性别多样化的个体提供了根据她们不同的生活经历做出自主决策所需的工具、知识和资源。方法:我们使用PubMed、EBSCOhost、EMBASE和SciSpace数据库进行了范围综述。我们纳入了2013年至2023年间以任何语言发表的实施、评估和实验研究,排除了不符合这些标准的研究。我们使用世界卫生组织的量表来确定性别反应的水平。结果:我们发现了2013年至2023年间以任何语言发表的30项实施、评估和实验研究。我们按照世界卫生组织的标准将战略分类为性别变革(4项研究)、性别特定(24项研究)和性别敏感(2项研究)。没有一项研究报告了妨碍生殖健康和权利的战略。所有战略都涉及妇女和女童,没有一项明确针对有生育能力的性别多样化人群。结论:本研究强调了将性别转化活动纳入怀孕后避孕策略的重要性,并强调了理解和解决当地性别规范和更广泛的卫生系统背景的必要性,以有效促进身体自主。研究结果表明,成功与否不应仅仅通过避孕措施的摄入来衡量,还应通过干预措施在多大程度上解决了与性别有关的障碍来衡量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
期刊最新文献
Bringing severe non-communicable disease care to district-level hospitals in Nepal: PEN-Plus experience and regional policy implications. Opportunities and challenges in integrating family planning and nutrition services in Tanzania: a mixed-methods study. Leveraging connections between family planning and nutrition to improve the health of women. Beyond parallel programmes: a roadmap for operational integration of family planning and nutrition in low- and middle-income countries. Opportunities and challenges for integrating family planning and nutrition policies and programmes in Burkina Faso: a mixed-methods study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1