Evrim Erdemoglu, Catherine Rowley, Sumin Oh, Johhny Yi
{"title":"Robotic Exploration and Suture Removal following Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension.","authors":"Evrim Erdemoglu, Catherine Rowley, Sumin Oh, Johhny Yi","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>To demonstrate a deep robotic dissection of the sacrospinous ligament due to suture abscess after failed vaginal approach.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A stepwise demonstration of the procedure and critical anatomy with narrated video.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary care academic center. A 71-year-old patient with a pelvic abscess noted on magnetic resonance imaging with persistent vaginal bleeding after sacrospinous ligament suspension using permanent, multi-filament suture. Despite multiple vaginal attempts to remove the suture, the abscess and suture persisted. Decision was made to proceed with a robotic exploration.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Sacrospinous ligament suspension is a procedure supporting the vaginal apex by securing it to the sacrospinous ligament, typically on the right side. It is a durable, native tissue repair performed through extraperitoneal vaginal dissection of the pararectal space. With suture related complications, to release the stitch, a vaginal approach is often successful and less invasive. However, it may be challenging to dissect this plane due to adhesions and difficult visualization. In this video, we demonstrate a robotic-assisted abdominal approach developing the pararectal space and identifying deep pelvic space lesions when vaginal attempts have failed. The top-down approach offers better visualization of surrounding critical structures, overcoming the limitations of the vaginal approach with limited visualization. However, this requires advanced knowledge and comfort with deep retroperitoneal structures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The robotic approach offers an alternative to the vaginal approach and should be considered when the vaginal approach fails or is considered not feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.02.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study objective: To demonstrate a deep robotic dissection of the sacrospinous ligament due to suture abscess after failed vaginal approach.
Design: A stepwise demonstration of the procedure and critical anatomy with narrated video.
Setting: Tertiary care academic center. A 71-year-old patient with a pelvic abscess noted on magnetic resonance imaging with persistent vaginal bleeding after sacrospinous ligament suspension using permanent, multi-filament suture. Despite multiple vaginal attempts to remove the suture, the abscess and suture persisted. Decision was made to proceed with a robotic exploration.
Intervention: Sacrospinous ligament suspension is a procedure supporting the vaginal apex by securing it to the sacrospinous ligament, typically on the right side. It is a durable, native tissue repair performed through extraperitoneal vaginal dissection of the pararectal space. With suture related complications, to release the stitch, a vaginal approach is often successful and less invasive. However, it may be challenging to dissect this plane due to adhesions and difficult visualization. In this video, we demonstrate a robotic-assisted abdominal approach developing the pararectal space and identifying deep pelvic space lesions when vaginal attempts have failed. The top-down approach offers better visualization of surrounding critical structures, overcoming the limitations of the vaginal approach with limited visualization. However, this requires advanced knowledge and comfort with deep retroperitoneal structures.
Conclusion: The robotic approach offers an alternative to the vaginal approach and should be considered when the vaginal approach fails or is considered not feasible.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.