Is Non-Invasive Ventilation a Good Choice in All Patients with Severe COVID-19? A Cohort Retrospective Study.

Q3 Medicine Tanaffos Pub Date : 2024-02-01
Ramin Sami, Babak Amra, Forogh Soltaninejad, Zohre Naderi, Marjan Mansourian, Mina Nickpour, Media Babahajiani, Marzieh Hashemi
{"title":"Is Non-Invasive Ventilation a Good Choice in All Patients with Severe COVID-19? A Cohort Retrospective Study.","authors":"Ramin Sami, Babak Amra, Forogh Soltaninejad, Zohre Naderi, Marjan Mansourian, Mina Nickpour, Media Babahajiani, Marzieh Hashemi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The recent outbreak of Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory disorder caused by the Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2. At the start of the epidemic, early intubation was the optimal strategy for managing ARDS caused by COVID-19. Several non-invasive methods for respiratory support in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 may reduce intubation, disease severity, ventilator use, and hospitalization in the intensive care unit (ICU). In this study, the characteristics of COVID-19 patients who failed NIV therapy were compared with those who had successful NIV.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The present descriptive-analytical study was conducted at the COVID-19 center of KHORSHID University Hospital. Patients were aged > 18 years with confirmed COVID-19 and hospitalized in the ICU from the beginning of January to the end of March 2021. They had an oxygen level of < 88% despite receiving 15 L of oxygen with reserve masks and were undergoing non-invasive ventilation (NIV) treatment. Data collection included patients' demographic information, vital signs, and test results upon hospital admission, and assessed disease severity using APACHE, SAPS, and SOFA scores. Patients were categorized into responders (R) and non-responders (NR) to determine predictors of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) success, with follow-up based on device tolerance and changes in vital signs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>71 Individuals were candidates for NIV. Twenty patients were excluded from the study, and 51 patients were included in the study. Of these, 35 patients underwent NIV treatment failure (NR). On the other hand, 16 (31.4%) patients completely recovered after receiving NIV (R) and they were discharged from the ICU.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Serum Albumin and BMI levels of COVID-19 patients undergoing NIV therapy seem to affect their responses to treatment. Hence, it is recommended to evaluate the nutritional status of patients before the start of NIV .</p>","PeriodicalId":22247,"journal":{"name":"Tanaffos","volume":"23 2","pages":"176-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanaffos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The recent outbreak of Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory disorder caused by the Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2. At the start of the epidemic, early intubation was the optimal strategy for managing ARDS caused by COVID-19. Several non-invasive methods for respiratory support in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 may reduce intubation, disease severity, ventilator use, and hospitalization in the intensive care unit (ICU). In this study, the characteristics of COVID-19 patients who failed NIV therapy were compared with those who had successful NIV.

Materials and methods: The present descriptive-analytical study was conducted at the COVID-19 center of KHORSHID University Hospital. Patients were aged > 18 years with confirmed COVID-19 and hospitalized in the ICU from the beginning of January to the end of March 2021. They had an oxygen level of < 88% despite receiving 15 L of oxygen with reserve masks and were undergoing non-invasive ventilation (NIV) treatment. Data collection included patients' demographic information, vital signs, and test results upon hospital admission, and assessed disease severity using APACHE, SAPS, and SOFA scores. Patients were categorized into responders (R) and non-responders (NR) to determine predictors of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) success, with follow-up based on device tolerance and changes in vital signs.

Results: 71 Individuals were candidates for NIV. Twenty patients were excluded from the study, and 51 patients were included in the study. Of these, 35 patients underwent NIV treatment failure (NR). On the other hand, 16 (31.4%) patients completely recovered after receiving NIV (R) and they were discharged from the ICU.

Conclusion: Serum Albumin and BMI levels of COVID-19 patients undergoing NIV therapy seem to affect their responses to treatment. Hence, it is recommended to evaluate the nutritional status of patients before the start of NIV .

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tanaffos
Tanaffos Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A 26-Year-Old Man with Productive Cough, Hemoptysis, and Weight Loss. Airflow-Related Shear Stress: The Main Cause of VILI or not? Association Between CT Finding Changes and Clinical Course in COVID-19 Patients: A Single Center Retrospective Study. An Alarm for Pediatricians Facing BCG Vaccine Complications. Comparison of Acromio-Axillo-Suprasternal Notch Index (AASI) with Hyomental Distance Ratio Test (HMDR) in Predicting Difficult Visualization of the Larynx.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1