Adjuvant treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a real-world study.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17588359251316179
Yuxin Geng, Junfeng Zhao, Ying Li, Yintao Li
{"title":"Adjuvant treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a real-world study.","authors":"Yuxin Geng, Junfeng Zhao, Ying Li, Yintao Li","doi":"10.1177/17588359251316179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) combined with surgery is the standard treatment option for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) administered postoperatively has a survival benefit remains inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate whether AC is necessary after NCRT and esophagectomy and determine which patients might benefit from it.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study examined patients with ESCC treated with NCRT followed by radical esophagectomy at three hospitals between March 2016 and December 2022. Patients were assigned into the adjuvant and non-adjuvant therapy groups based on whether they received postoperative AC, allowing the comparison of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. In addition, based on whether postoperative pathology indicated pathological complete response (pCR), patients were classified into the pCR and non-pCR populations, with DFS and OS separately analyzed for each subgroup.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 218 eligible patients were enrolled. No significant advantage was found in DFS (<i>p</i> = 0.540) and OS (<i>p</i> = 0.058) between the adjuvant and non-adjuvant therapy groups. In the non-pCR population, the adjuvant therapy groups had a significant advantage in DFS (<i>p</i> = 0.046) and OS (<i>p</i> = 0.011) compared to the non-adjuvant therapy group. However, in the pCR population, no significant advantage was found in DFS (<i>p</i> = 0.490) and OS (<i>p</i> = 0.110) analyses between the adjuvant and non-adjuvant therapy groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the real world, patients with ESCC who underwent NCRT combined with radical esophagectomy and whose postoperative pathology was pCR did not benefit from AC. However, AC significantly improved DFS and OS in patients whose postoperative pathology did not reach pCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17588359251316179"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359251316179","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) combined with surgery is the standard treatment option for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) administered postoperatively has a survival benefit remains inconclusive.

Objectives: To investigate whether AC is necessary after NCRT and esophagectomy and determine which patients might benefit from it.

Design: A retrospective study.

Methods: This retrospective study examined patients with ESCC treated with NCRT followed by radical esophagectomy at three hospitals between March 2016 and December 2022. Patients were assigned into the adjuvant and non-adjuvant therapy groups based on whether they received postoperative AC, allowing the comparison of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. In addition, based on whether postoperative pathology indicated pathological complete response (pCR), patients were classified into the pCR and non-pCR populations, with DFS and OS separately analyzed for each subgroup.

Results: Overall, 218 eligible patients were enrolled. No significant advantage was found in DFS (p = 0.540) and OS (p = 0.058) between the adjuvant and non-adjuvant therapy groups. In the non-pCR population, the adjuvant therapy groups had a significant advantage in DFS (p = 0.046) and OS (p = 0.011) compared to the non-adjuvant therapy group. However, in the pCR population, no significant advantage was found in DFS (p = 0.490) and OS (p = 0.110) analyses between the adjuvant and non-adjuvant therapy groups.

Conclusion: In the real world, patients with ESCC who underwent NCRT combined with radical esophagectomy and whose postoperative pathology was pCR did not benefit from AC. However, AC significantly improved DFS and OS in patients whose postoperative pathology did not reach pCR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of cancer. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in medical oncology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Adjuvant treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a real-world study. Clinical impact of hypomagnesemia induced by necitumumab plus cisplatin and gemcitabine treatment in patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma: a subanalysis of the NINJA study. Association of baseline inflammatory biomarkers and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Radiotherapy combined with locoregional hyperthermia for oligoprogression in metastatic melanoma local control. Impact of corticosteroids on the efficacy of first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1