{"title":"Adjuvant treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a real-world study.","authors":"Yuxin Geng, Junfeng Zhao, Ying Li, Yintao Li","doi":"10.1177/17588359251316179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) combined with surgery is the standard treatment option for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) administered postoperatively has a survival benefit remains inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate whether AC is necessary after NCRT and esophagectomy and determine which patients might benefit from it.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study examined patients with ESCC treated with NCRT followed by radical esophagectomy at three hospitals between March 2016 and December 2022. Patients were assigned into the adjuvant and non-adjuvant therapy groups based on whether they received postoperative AC, allowing the comparison of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. In addition, based on whether postoperative pathology indicated pathological complete response (pCR), patients were classified into the pCR and non-pCR populations, with DFS and OS separately analyzed for each subgroup.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 218 eligible patients were enrolled. No significant advantage was found in DFS (<i>p</i> = 0.540) and OS (<i>p</i> = 0.058) between the adjuvant and non-adjuvant therapy groups. In the non-pCR population, the adjuvant therapy groups had a significant advantage in DFS (<i>p</i> = 0.046) and OS (<i>p</i> = 0.011) compared to the non-adjuvant therapy group. However, in the pCR population, no significant advantage was found in DFS (<i>p</i> = 0.490) and OS (<i>p</i> = 0.110) analyses between the adjuvant and non-adjuvant therapy groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the real world, patients with ESCC who underwent NCRT combined with radical esophagectomy and whose postoperative pathology was pCR did not benefit from AC. However, AC significantly improved DFS and OS in patients whose postoperative pathology did not reach pCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17588359251316179"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359251316179","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) combined with surgery is the standard treatment option for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) administered postoperatively has a survival benefit remains inconclusive.
Objectives: To investigate whether AC is necessary after NCRT and esophagectomy and determine which patients might benefit from it.
Design: A retrospective study.
Methods: This retrospective study examined patients with ESCC treated with NCRT followed by radical esophagectomy at three hospitals between March 2016 and December 2022. Patients were assigned into the adjuvant and non-adjuvant therapy groups based on whether they received postoperative AC, allowing the comparison of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. In addition, based on whether postoperative pathology indicated pathological complete response (pCR), patients were classified into the pCR and non-pCR populations, with DFS and OS separately analyzed for each subgroup.
Results: Overall, 218 eligible patients were enrolled. No significant advantage was found in DFS (p = 0.540) and OS (p = 0.058) between the adjuvant and non-adjuvant therapy groups. In the non-pCR population, the adjuvant therapy groups had a significant advantage in DFS (p = 0.046) and OS (p = 0.011) compared to the non-adjuvant therapy group. However, in the pCR population, no significant advantage was found in DFS (p = 0.490) and OS (p = 0.110) analyses between the adjuvant and non-adjuvant therapy groups.
Conclusion: In the real world, patients with ESCC who underwent NCRT combined with radical esophagectomy and whose postoperative pathology was pCR did not benefit from AC. However, AC significantly improved DFS and OS in patients whose postoperative pathology did not reach pCR.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of cancer. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in medical oncology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).