Adjuvant treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a real-world study.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17588359251316179
Yuxin Geng, Junfeng Zhao, Ying Li, Yintao Li
{"title":"Adjuvant treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a real-world study.","authors":"Yuxin Geng, Junfeng Zhao, Ying Li, Yintao Li","doi":"10.1177/17588359251316179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) combined with surgery is the standard treatment option for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) administered postoperatively has a survival benefit remains inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate whether AC is necessary after NCRT and esophagectomy and determine which patients might benefit from it.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study examined patients with ESCC treated with NCRT followed by radical esophagectomy at three hospitals between March 2016 and December 2022. Patients were assigned into the adjuvant and non-adjuvant therapy groups based on whether they received postoperative AC, allowing the comparison of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. In addition, based on whether postoperative pathology indicated pathological complete response (pCR), patients were classified into the pCR and non-pCR populations, with DFS and OS separately analyzed for each subgroup.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 218 eligible patients were enrolled. No significant advantage was found in DFS (<i>p</i> = 0.540) and OS (<i>p</i> = 0.058) between the adjuvant and non-adjuvant therapy groups. In the non-pCR population, the adjuvant therapy groups had a significant advantage in DFS (<i>p</i> = 0.046) and OS (<i>p</i> = 0.011) compared to the non-adjuvant therapy group. However, in the pCR population, no significant advantage was found in DFS (<i>p</i> = 0.490) and OS (<i>p</i> = 0.110) analyses between the adjuvant and non-adjuvant therapy groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the real world, patients with ESCC who underwent NCRT combined with radical esophagectomy and whose postoperative pathology was pCR did not benefit from AC. However, AC significantly improved DFS and OS in patients whose postoperative pathology did not reach pCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17588359251316179"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359251316179","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) combined with surgery is the standard treatment option for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) administered postoperatively has a survival benefit remains inconclusive.

Objectives: To investigate whether AC is necessary after NCRT and esophagectomy and determine which patients might benefit from it.

Design: A retrospective study.

Methods: This retrospective study examined patients with ESCC treated with NCRT followed by radical esophagectomy at three hospitals between March 2016 and December 2022. Patients were assigned into the adjuvant and non-adjuvant therapy groups based on whether they received postoperative AC, allowing the comparison of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. In addition, based on whether postoperative pathology indicated pathological complete response (pCR), patients were classified into the pCR and non-pCR populations, with DFS and OS separately analyzed for each subgroup.

Results: Overall, 218 eligible patients were enrolled. No significant advantage was found in DFS (p = 0.540) and OS (p = 0.058) between the adjuvant and non-adjuvant therapy groups. In the non-pCR population, the adjuvant therapy groups had a significant advantage in DFS (p = 0.046) and OS (p = 0.011) compared to the non-adjuvant therapy group. However, in the pCR population, no significant advantage was found in DFS (p = 0.490) and OS (p = 0.110) analyses between the adjuvant and non-adjuvant therapy groups.

Conclusion: In the real world, patients with ESCC who underwent NCRT combined with radical esophagectomy and whose postoperative pathology was pCR did not benefit from AC. However, AC significantly improved DFS and OS in patients whose postoperative pathology did not reach pCR.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食管鳞状细胞癌患者新辅助放化疗和手术后的辅助治疗:一项真实世界的研究。
背景:新辅助放化疗(NCRT)联合手术是局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者的标准治疗选择。然而,是否术后给予辅助化疗(AC)有生存效益仍然没有定论。目的:探讨在NCRT和食管切除术后是否需要AC,并确定哪些患者可能从AC中获益。设计:回顾性研究。方法:本回顾性研究对2016年3月至2022年12月三家医院的ESCC患者进行了NCRT治疗并进行了根治性食管切除术。根据患者术后是否接受AC治疗,将患者分为辅助治疗组和非辅助治疗组,比较两组患者的无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。此外,根据术后病理是否显示病理完全缓解(pCR),将患者分为pCR组和非pCR组,分别分析每个亚组的DFS和OS。结果:总的来说,218名符合条件的患者入组。辅助治疗组和非辅助治疗组的DFS (p = 0.540)和OS (p = 0.058)无显著优势。在非pcr人群中,与非辅助治疗组相比,辅助治疗组在DFS (p = 0.046)和OS (p = 0.011)方面具有显著优势。然而,在pCR人群中,辅助治疗组和非辅助治疗组在DFS (p = 0.490)和OS (p = 0.110)分析中没有发现显著优势。结论:在现实生活中,接受NCRT联合根治性食管切除术且术后病理为pCR的ESCC患者并没有从AC中获益,但在术后病理未达到pCR的患者中,AC可显著改善DFS和OS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of cancer. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in medical oncology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Low-level HBV viremia independently predicts poor outcomes in patients with intermediate-to-advanced HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma receiving systemic therapy: a multicenter retrospective study. S100A4 characterize antigen-presenting cancer-associated fibroblasts and predicts surgical outcomes in relapsed ovarian cancer. Association of CMTM6 expression with clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic implications in renal cell carcinoma. Updated cost comparison of home care subcutaneous versus outpatient intravenous trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer in Singapore. Effectiveness, safety, and biomarker analysis of sacituzumab govitecan in Chinese metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter real-world study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1