Patient-reported outcomes in the early postoperative period following resection of unilateral multiple pulmonary nodules: implications for surgical decision-making.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Translational lung cancer research Pub Date : 2025-01-24 Epub Date: 2025-01-16 DOI:10.21037/tlcr-24-702
Qian Hong, Hang Yi, Yan Wang, Wenqi Li, Chang Zhan, Shuai Zhu, Ding Yang, Rui Han, Guochao Zhang, Juwei Mu
{"title":"Patient-reported outcomes in the early postoperative period following resection of unilateral multiple pulmonary nodules: implications for surgical decision-making.","authors":"Qian Hong, Hang Yi, Yan Wang, Wenqi Li, Chang Zhan, Shuai Zhu, Ding Yang, Rui Han, Guochao Zhang, Juwei Mu","doi":"10.21037/tlcr-24-702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With increased early lung cancer screening, synchronous multiple pulmonary nodules are more frequently detected. However, due to the lack of standardized treatment strategies, their management remains contentious. This study utilizes patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to assess early postoperative symptoms and functionality, aiming to determine the optimal resection extent for unilateral multiple pulmonary nodules.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this longitudinal cohort study, 550 patients undergoing single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for pulmonary nodules were categorized into two groups based on resection extent: single-lobe and multiple-lobe. The Perioperative Symptom Assessment for Patients Undergoing Lung Surgery (PSA-Lung) scale was used to measure symptom severity, functional status, and short-term outcomes preoperatively, daily from postoperative days 1-4, and weekly up to four weeks post-surgery. Mixed-effects models were used to compare the differences in PRO scores over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the participants, 416 had single-lobe and 134 had multiple-lobe surgeries. The multiple-lobe group reported significantly worse symptoms of pain (P=0.04), shortness of breath (P<0.001), disturbed sleep (P=0.007), and fatigue (P=0.01), along with greater functional impairments in walking (P=0.002) and daily activities (P=0.002). We then analyzed the distribution of postoperative moderate-severe symptoms and functional impairment in both groups. We found that the proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe shortness of breath (P<0.001), disturbed sleep (P<0.001), difficulty in walking (P=0.001), and difficulty in daily activities (P<0.001) was significantly higher in the multiple-lobe group than in the single-lobe group. Moreover, patients with multiple-lobe surgeries had a longer recovery time from pain (P=0.02) and drowsiness (P=0.005) than those with single lobe surgeries. As a matter of course, surgical times were significantly longer in the multiple-lobe group than in the single-lobe group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple-lobe surgery patients faced more severe postoperative symptoms and functional impairments, with extended recovery times. These results advocate for a conservative surgical approach, favoring long-term monitoring over extensive resection for patients with unilateral multiple nodules without clear signs of malignancy or progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":23271,"journal":{"name":"Translational lung cancer research","volume":"14 1","pages":"27-39"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11826271/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational lung cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-702","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With increased early lung cancer screening, synchronous multiple pulmonary nodules are more frequently detected. However, due to the lack of standardized treatment strategies, their management remains contentious. This study utilizes patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to assess early postoperative symptoms and functionality, aiming to determine the optimal resection extent for unilateral multiple pulmonary nodules.

Methods: In this longitudinal cohort study, 550 patients undergoing single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for pulmonary nodules were categorized into two groups based on resection extent: single-lobe and multiple-lobe. The Perioperative Symptom Assessment for Patients Undergoing Lung Surgery (PSA-Lung) scale was used to measure symptom severity, functional status, and short-term outcomes preoperatively, daily from postoperative days 1-4, and weekly up to four weeks post-surgery. Mixed-effects models were used to compare the differences in PRO scores over time.

Results: Among the participants, 416 had single-lobe and 134 had multiple-lobe surgeries. The multiple-lobe group reported significantly worse symptoms of pain (P=0.04), shortness of breath (P<0.001), disturbed sleep (P=0.007), and fatigue (P=0.01), along with greater functional impairments in walking (P=0.002) and daily activities (P=0.002). We then analyzed the distribution of postoperative moderate-severe symptoms and functional impairment in both groups. We found that the proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe shortness of breath (P<0.001), disturbed sleep (P<0.001), difficulty in walking (P=0.001), and difficulty in daily activities (P<0.001) was significantly higher in the multiple-lobe group than in the single-lobe group. Moreover, patients with multiple-lobe surgeries had a longer recovery time from pain (P=0.02) and drowsiness (P=0.005) than those with single lobe surgeries. As a matter of course, surgical times were significantly longer in the multiple-lobe group than in the single-lobe group.

Conclusions: Multiple-lobe surgery patients faced more severe postoperative symptoms and functional impairments, with extended recovery times. These results advocate for a conservative surgical approach, favoring long-term monitoring over extensive resection for patients with unilateral multiple nodules without clear signs of malignancy or progression.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Translational Lung Cancer Research(TLCR, Transl Lung Cancer Res, Print ISSN 2218-6751; Online ISSN 2226-4477) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal, which was founded in March 2012. TLCR is indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central and the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Databases. It is published quarterly the first year, and published bimonthly since February 2013. It provides practical up-to-date information on prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. Specific areas of its interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, markers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances related to lung cancer.
期刊最新文献
GNGT1 remodels the tumor microenvironment and promotes immune escape through enhancing tumor stemness and modulating the fibrinogen beta chain-neutrophil extracellular trap signaling axis in lung adenocarcinoma. MS4A15 gene expression as a prognostic marker for clinical outcomes in lung adenocarcinoma. SMARCA4/BRG1-deficient non-small cell lung cancer: clinical, imaging, pathological features, and follow-up results of 23 patients. Association between immunotherapy timing and efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive analysis at a high-volume specialist centre. Association of systemic therapy with survival among adults with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1