[Correlation and predictive value analysis of systemic inflammation grade and plaque stability in patients with carotid artery stenosis].

Q H Wang, C Tang, J Cai, Y M Wang, L Zheng, B Zhao, L Z Fan, Q Ni, Z S Liang, T Qiao
{"title":"[Correlation and predictive value analysis of systemic inflammation grade and plaque stability in patients with carotid artery stenosis].","authors":"Q H Wang, C Tang, J Cai, Y M Wang, L Zheng, B Zhao, L Z Fan, Q Ni, Z S Liang, T Qiao","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240822-01937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To analyze the correlation between the systemic inflammation score (SIG) and plaque stability in patients with carotid artery stenosis, and to evaluate the predictive value. <b>Methods:</b> The clinical data of 149 patients with carotid artery stenosis who were hospitalized in Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School from January 2019 to October 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, including 124 males and 25 females, aged (68.2±8.9) years. According to the results of pathological analysis of specimens after carotid endarterectomy, the patients were divided into plaque stable group (<i>n</i>=70) and plaque vulnerable group (<i>n</i>=79). After preoperative blood biochemical indexes were collected and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and modified glasgow prognostic score(mGPS) were calculated, the SIG was calculated together. The multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze the correlative factors of plaque stability in patients with carotid artery stenosis, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the predictive value of SIG for plaque stability in patients with carotid artery stenosis. <b>Results:</b> The proportion of patients with a history of diabetes in the plaque vulnerable group [36.7% (29/79) vs 20.0% (14/70)] and IL-6 [0.43 (0.31, 0.64) vs 0.34 (0.17, 0.44) ng/L] were higher than those in the plaque stabilization group(both <i>P</i><0.05). The mGPS score and SIG score of the plaque vulnerable group were higher than those of the plaque stabilization group (both <i>P</i><0.05). The results of the multivariate logistic regression model showed that diabetes history (<i>OR</i>=2.82, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.23-6.48), high interleukin-6 (IL-6) level (<i>OR</i>=1.16, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.01-1.33), and high SIG scores [with SIG=0 as the reference, <i>OR</i> (SIG=1)=1.76,95%<i>CI</i>:1.21-2.41;<i>OR</i> (SIG=2)=2.21,95%<i>CI</i>:1.51-3.01;<i>OR</i> (SIG=3)=4.47,95%<i>CI</i>:2.42-6.52;<i>OR</i> (SIG=4)=3.19,95%<i>CI</i>:2.01-4.36] were risk factors for plaque instability in patients with carotid artery stenosis. The results of ROC curve analysis showed that when the SIG cut-off value was 1.5 points, the sensitivity and specificity of predicting plaque stability in patients with carotid artery stenosis were 70.0%, the specificity was 74.3%, and the area under the curve was 0.745 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.666-0.825, <i>P</i><0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> High SIG score is a risk factor for plaque stability in patients with carotid artery stenosis and has a good predictive value.</p>","PeriodicalId":24023,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","volume":"105 7","pages":"537-543"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240822-01937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the correlation between the systemic inflammation score (SIG) and plaque stability in patients with carotid artery stenosis, and to evaluate the predictive value. Methods: The clinical data of 149 patients with carotid artery stenosis who were hospitalized in Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School from January 2019 to October 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, including 124 males and 25 females, aged (68.2±8.9) years. According to the results of pathological analysis of specimens after carotid endarterectomy, the patients were divided into plaque stable group (n=70) and plaque vulnerable group (n=79). After preoperative blood biochemical indexes were collected and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and modified glasgow prognostic score(mGPS) were calculated, the SIG was calculated together. The multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze the correlative factors of plaque stability in patients with carotid artery stenosis, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the predictive value of SIG for plaque stability in patients with carotid artery stenosis. Results: The proportion of patients with a history of diabetes in the plaque vulnerable group [36.7% (29/79) vs 20.0% (14/70)] and IL-6 [0.43 (0.31, 0.64) vs 0.34 (0.17, 0.44) ng/L] were higher than those in the plaque stabilization group(both P<0.05). The mGPS score and SIG score of the plaque vulnerable group were higher than those of the plaque stabilization group (both P<0.05). The results of the multivariate logistic regression model showed that diabetes history (OR=2.82, 95%CI: 1.23-6.48), high interleukin-6 (IL-6) level (OR=1.16, 95%CI: 1.01-1.33), and high SIG scores [with SIG=0 as the reference, OR (SIG=1)=1.76,95%CI:1.21-2.41;OR (SIG=2)=2.21,95%CI:1.51-3.01;OR (SIG=3)=4.47,95%CI:2.42-6.52;OR (SIG=4)=3.19,95%CI:2.01-4.36] were risk factors for plaque instability in patients with carotid artery stenosis. The results of ROC curve analysis showed that when the SIG cut-off value was 1.5 points, the sensitivity and specificity of predicting plaque stability in patients with carotid artery stenosis were 70.0%, the specificity was 74.3%, and the area under the curve was 0.745 (95%CI: 0.666-0.825, P<0.001). Conclusion: High SIG score is a risk factor for plaque stability in patients with carotid artery stenosis and has a good predictive value.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[颈动脉狭窄患者全身炎症等级与斑块稳定性的相关性及预测值分析]。
目的:分析颈动脉狭窄患者全身炎症评分(SIG)与斑块稳定性的相关性,并评价其预测价值。方法回顾性分析南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院2019年1月至2023年10月收治的颈动脉狭窄患者149例的临床资料,其中男性124例,女性25例,年龄(68.2±8.9)岁。根据颈动脉内膜切除术后标本病理分析结果,将患者分为斑块稳定组(n=70)和斑块易损组(n=79)。收集术前血液生化指标,计算中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率和改良格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)后,共同计算SIG。采用多元logistic回归模型分析颈动脉狭窄患者斑块稳定性的相关因素,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析SIG对颈动脉狭窄患者斑块稳定性的预测价值。结果:斑块易损组中有糖尿病史的患者比例[36.7% (29/79)vs 20.0%(14/70)]和IL-6 [0.43 (0.31, 0.64) vs 0.34 (0.17, 0.44) ng/L]均高于斑块稳定组(PPOR=2.82, 95%CI: 1.23-6.48)、高水平白细胞介素-6 (IL-6) (OR=1.16, 95%CI:1.01-1.33)和高SIG评分[以SIG=0为参考,OR (SIG=1)=1.76,95%CI:1.21-2.41;OR (SIG=2)=2.21,95%CI:1.51-3.01;OR (SIG=3)=4.47,95%CI:2.42-6.52;OR (SIG=4)=3.19,95%CI:2.01-4.36]是颈动脉狭窄患者斑块不稳定的危险因素。ROC曲线分析结果显示,当SIG截断值为1.5分时,预测颈动脉狭窄患者斑块稳定性的敏感性和特异性为70.0%,特异性为74.3%,曲线下面积为0.745 (95%CI: 0.666-0.825)。结论:SIG评分高是颈动脉狭窄患者斑块稳定性的危险因素,具有较好的预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
400
期刊最新文献
[Prevalence and influencing factors of chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis]. [Recent advances in hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for conversion therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma]. [Sequential surgery following conversion therapy based on the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antiangiogenic targeted drugs alters the treatment landscape and outcomes for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma]. [Effect of sodium bicarbonate Ringer's solution on postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting]. [Identification of multidimensional symptom subgroups in parents who lost their only child and its neurostructural and neurofunctional characteristics].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1