Analysis of laboratory safety culture in the university: a case study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ERGONOMICS International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1080/10803548.2025.2454767
Mengjing Cui, Wei Du, Lijun Fan, Jigang Wang, Hui Jin
{"title":"Analysis of laboratory safety culture in the university: a case study.","authors":"Mengjing Cui, Wei Du, Lijun Fan, Jigang Wang, Hui Jin","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2025.2454767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives</i>. The research purpose of this article was to investigate the status of laboratory safety culture in universities, in order to carry out more targeted laboratory cultural construction activities in the later stage. Safety culture also can have a lasting impact on university students as future practitioners. <i>Methods</i>. With Southeast University as a case study, a sample of 8761 study participants completed the safety culture measurement questionnaire (SCMQ). The independent-sample <i>t</i> test, single-factor analysis of variance and multilevel logistic regression were used to analyze the general characteristic distribution of the safety culture level. <i>Results</i>. The overall average score of safety culture was 74.84. Among the 32 elements of safety culture, six elements scored less than 60 points. Multilevel logistic regression analysis showed that the distribution of safety culture scores varied across schools, work roles, genders, years of laboratory use and laboratory safety culture familiarity. <i>Conclusions</i>. University laboratories should strengthen the construction of safety culture, for the safety elements with low scores, and intervene from the organizational level (school level). The key focus groups were males, students and those who have used the laboratory for 2-4 years, and those with low awareness of safety culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":47704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"583-593"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2025.2454767","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. The research purpose of this article was to investigate the status of laboratory safety culture in universities, in order to carry out more targeted laboratory cultural construction activities in the later stage. Safety culture also can have a lasting impact on university students as future practitioners. Methods. With Southeast University as a case study, a sample of 8761 study participants completed the safety culture measurement questionnaire (SCMQ). The independent-sample t test, single-factor analysis of variance and multilevel logistic regression were used to analyze the general characteristic distribution of the safety culture level. Results. The overall average score of safety culture was 74.84. Among the 32 elements of safety culture, six elements scored less than 60 points. Multilevel logistic regression analysis showed that the distribution of safety culture scores varied across schools, work roles, genders, years of laboratory use and laboratory safety culture familiarity. Conclusions. University laboratories should strengthen the construction of safety culture, for the safety elements with low scores, and intervene from the organizational level (school level). The key focus groups were males, students and those who have used the laboratory for 2-4 years, and those with low awareness of safety culture.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学实验室安全文化分析:个案研究。
目标。本文的研究目的是调查高校实验室安全文化的现状,以便在后期开展更有针对性的实验室文化建设活动。安全文化也可以对大学生未来的从业人员产生持久的影响。方法。以东南大学为例,8761名研究参与者完成了安全文化测量问卷(SCMQ)。采用独立样本t检验、单因素方差分析和多水平logistic回归分析安全文化水平的总体特征分布。结果。安全文化总体平均得分为74.84分。在32个安全文化要素中,有6个要素得分低于60分。多水平logistic回归分析表明,安全文化得分的分布在学校、工作角色、性别、实验室使用年限和实验室安全文化熟悉程度等方面存在差异。结论。高校实验室应加强安全文化建设,针对得分较低的安全要素,从组织层面(学校层面)进行干预。重点人群为男性、在校学生和使用实验室2 ~ 4年的人群,以及安全文化意识较低的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
152
期刊最新文献
Reinforcing safety behaviours of leaders in the South Korean maritime industry. A study of the relationship between EEG and situation awareness of forklift drivers in task scenarios with different complexities. Examining the route from perceived organizational support to psychological symptoms of white-collar workers: a serial mediation path model. Prevalence and factors associated with enhanced physiologic tremor among health personnel: a cross-sectional study. Developing behavioural markers of high-speed workboat crews' competencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1