Is the information about occupational health and safety on YouTube reliable for users?

Müberra Terzi Kumandaş, Naci Murat
{"title":"Is the information about occupational health and safety on YouTube reliable for users?","authors":"Müberra Terzi Kumandaş, Naci Murat","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2025.2455284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Companies provide employees with occupational health and safety (OHS) training through videos on YouTube. In this study, the reliability of 118 YouTube videos related to OHS was evaluated by two experts using <i>Journal of the American Medical Association</i> (JAMA) and global quality score (GQS) scales. Six video variables - video duration, number of subscribers, likes, views, publication time and comments - were evaluated based on video source (five groups) and type (seven groups). The correlation analysis found a positive significant relationship between all variables except publication time-number of comments. Scores according to video source and type were 1.9 out of 4 on the JAMA scale and 2.3 out of 5 on the GQS scale. These scores show that the videos are inadequate and of poor quality. There was a statistically significant difference between video durations according to video type. Moreover, video sources differ depending on the number of subscribers and comments.</p>","PeriodicalId":47704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2025.2455284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Companies provide employees with occupational health and safety (OHS) training through videos on YouTube. In this study, the reliability of 118 YouTube videos related to OHS was evaluated by two experts using Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and global quality score (GQS) scales. Six video variables - video duration, number of subscribers, likes, views, publication time and comments - were evaluated based on video source (five groups) and type (seven groups). The correlation analysis found a positive significant relationship between all variables except publication time-number of comments. Scores according to video source and type were 1.9 out of 4 on the JAMA scale and 2.3 out of 5 on the GQS scale. These scores show that the videos are inadequate and of poor quality. There was a statistically significant difference between video durations according to video type. Moreover, video sources differ depending on the number of subscribers and comments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业通过 YouTube 上的视频为员工提供职业健康与安全(OHS)培训。在这项研究中,两位专家使用《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)和全球质量评分(GQS)量表对 118 个与职业健康安全相关的 YouTube 视频的可靠性进行了评估。根据视频来源(5 组)和类型(7 组)对视频时长、订阅人数、点赞数、浏览量、发布时间和评论等 6 个视频变量进行了评估。相关分析发现,除发布时间-评论数量外,其他变量之间均存在显著的正相关关系。根据视频来源和类型进行的评分在 JAMA 量表中为 1.9 分(满分 4 分),在 GQS 量表中为 2.3 分(满分 5 分)。这些分数表明,视频的质量不高。从统计学角度看,不同视频类型的视频时长存在显著差异。此外,视频来源也因订阅者数量和评论而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
152
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the maximum voluntary isometric lumbar extension in three-dimensional positions. Machine learning-enhanced back muscle strength prediction considering lifting condition and individual characteristics. Musculoskeletal pains, eye symptoms and associated factors among office workers: a cross-sectional study from Turkey. Analysis of laboratory safety culture in the university: a case study. Analysis of typical unsafe behaviors and common characteristics in accidents: a case study of accidents occurring over the past 3 years in China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1