{"title":"From the 4Ms to a Disability-Friendly Healthcare System.","authors":"Teresa Moro, Jacqueline McGinley, Bonnie Ewald","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are approximately 3,922 Age-Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) sites in the United States (US). These systems promote better healthcare for adults age 65 and older by implementing the following four elements, referred to as the \"4Ms\", into care provision: 1) What Matters; 2) Medication; 3) Mentation; and 4) Mobility. There are no equivalent parameters to ensure high-quality care for adults with disabilities. This is problematic because many individuals with disabilities experience conditions associated with aging well before their 65th birthday. For example, adults with Down syndrome are more likely to develop earlier onset dementia and many will be diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease in their early 50s. While AFHS are of critical importance, by focusing solely on adults over age 65, we are missing an opportunity to improve the health and well-being of people with disabilities. Many adults living with disabilities would likely benefit from providers deliberately and thoughtfully addressing what matters, medication, mentation, and mobility. In this paper, we posit that implementing the 4Ms framework with younger adults with disabilities has the potential to both enhance compliance with the ADA and lay the ground work for making an equitable, disability-friendly health system a reality.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf060","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There are approximately 3,922 Age-Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) sites in the United States (US). These systems promote better healthcare for adults age 65 and older by implementing the following four elements, referred to as the "4Ms", into care provision: 1) What Matters; 2) Medication; 3) Mentation; and 4) Mobility. There are no equivalent parameters to ensure high-quality care for adults with disabilities. This is problematic because many individuals with disabilities experience conditions associated with aging well before their 65th birthday. For example, adults with Down syndrome are more likely to develop earlier onset dementia and many will be diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease in their early 50s. While AFHS are of critical importance, by focusing solely on adults over age 65, we are missing an opportunity to improve the health and well-being of people with disabilities. Many adults living with disabilities would likely benefit from providers deliberately and thoughtfully addressing what matters, medication, mentation, and mobility. In this paper, we posit that implementing the 4Ms framework with younger adults with disabilities has the potential to both enhance compliance with the ADA and lay the ground work for making an equitable, disability-friendly health system a reality.
期刊介绍:
The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.