Cross-Cultural Adaption and Psychometric Evaluation of Chinese Version of the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Research in Nursing & Health Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1002/nur.22441
Yanfei Miao, Qing Zhang, Hongmin Huang, Fei She, Bingjian Wang, Yiping Mao
{"title":"Cross-Cultural Adaption and Psychometric Evaluation of Chinese Version of the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index.","authors":"Yanfei Miao, Qing Zhang, Hongmin Huang, Fei She, Bingjian Wang, Yiping Mao","doi":"10.1002/nur.22441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To translate and adapt the English version of the Caregiver Contributions to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) to Chinese, and further to investigate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of CC-SCHFI in a cohort of caregivers of people with heart failure. CC-SCHFI translation and cross-cultural adaption were performed. 240 caregivers were recruited to complete the instrument. The internal construct reliability was evaluated by Cronbach's α and item-to-total correlations. The concurrent validity was tested by using the CACHS which also measures caregivers' contribution to HF self-care. Psychometric analysis was performed with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We evaluated 4-factor structure for caregiver contribution to self-care maintenance scale, 1-factor structure for caregiver contribution to self-care management scale and 2-factor structure for confidence in contributing to self-care scale. All the subjects successfully completed the interviews in an average of 12.3 ± 3.2 min. The internal consistency reliability analysis of the CC-SCHFI showed Cronbach α of 0.83. All items showed adequate discrimination, with the item-total correlation coefficient of greater than 0.4. The scores of CC-SCHFI scales were significantly correlated with the CACHS scale scores. The correlation coefficients ranged from 0.341 to 0.765, indicating acceptable concurrent validity. For CFA, all factor loadings were significant at > 0.30 and generally medium to high. The simplified Chinese version of CC-SCHFI is a psychometrically reliable instrument with empirically supported validity, which can be applied to clinical evaluation of the contribution of caregivers to HF self-care. Compared with CACHS, CC-SCHFI can be more easily completed and simultaneously maintains acceptable concurrent validity. Further studies are warranted to investigate the combined use of these two instruments among other populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22441","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To translate and adapt the English version of the Caregiver Contributions to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) to Chinese, and further to investigate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of CC-SCHFI in a cohort of caregivers of people with heart failure. CC-SCHFI translation and cross-cultural adaption were performed. 240 caregivers were recruited to complete the instrument. The internal construct reliability was evaluated by Cronbach's α and item-to-total correlations. The concurrent validity was tested by using the CACHS which also measures caregivers' contribution to HF self-care. Psychometric analysis was performed with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We evaluated 4-factor structure for caregiver contribution to self-care maintenance scale, 1-factor structure for caregiver contribution to self-care management scale and 2-factor structure for confidence in contributing to self-care scale. All the subjects successfully completed the interviews in an average of 12.3 ± 3.2 min. The internal consistency reliability analysis of the CC-SCHFI showed Cronbach α of 0.83. All items showed adequate discrimination, with the item-total correlation coefficient of greater than 0.4. The scores of CC-SCHFI scales were significantly correlated with the CACHS scale scores. The correlation coefficients ranged from 0.341 to 0.765, indicating acceptable concurrent validity. For CFA, all factor loadings were significant at > 0.30 and generally medium to high. The simplified Chinese version of CC-SCHFI is a psychometrically reliable instrument with empirically supported validity, which can be applied to clinical evaluation of the contribution of caregivers to HF self-care. Compared with CACHS, CC-SCHFI can be more easily completed and simultaneously maintains acceptable concurrent validity. Further studies are warranted to investigate the combined use of these two instruments among other populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Reproductive Health Care Inequities by Disability Status: Experiences With Providers and Barriers to Care. Cross-Cultural Adaption and Psychometric Evaluation of Chinese Version of the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index. Microbial Colonization and Associated Factors in Indwelling Urinary Catheters: A Cross-Sectional Study. Psychometric Testing of the Mutuality Scale in Patients and Caregiver Dyads After the Onset of Coronary Heart Disease. Prioritization Patterns of Nurses in the Management of a Patient With Delirium: Results of a Q-Methodology Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1