{"title":"Cross-Cultural Adaption and Psychometric Evaluation of Chinese Version of the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index.","authors":"Yanfei Miao, Qing Zhang, Hongmin Huang, Fei She, Bingjian Wang, Yiping Mao","doi":"10.1002/nur.22441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To translate and adapt the English version of the Caregiver Contributions to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) to Chinese, and further to investigate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of CC-SCHFI in a cohort of caregivers of people with heart failure. CC-SCHFI translation and cross-cultural adaption were performed. 240 caregivers were recruited to complete the instrument. The internal construct reliability was evaluated by Cronbach's α and item-to-total correlations. The concurrent validity was tested by using the CACHS which also measures caregivers' contribution to HF self-care. Psychometric analysis was performed with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We evaluated 4-factor structure for caregiver contribution to self-care maintenance scale, 1-factor structure for caregiver contribution to self-care management scale and 2-factor structure for confidence in contributing to self-care scale. All the subjects successfully completed the interviews in an average of 12.3 ± 3.2 min. The internal consistency reliability analysis of the CC-SCHFI showed Cronbach α of 0.83. All items showed adequate discrimination, with the item-total correlation coefficient of greater than 0.4. The scores of CC-SCHFI scales were significantly correlated with the CACHS scale scores. The correlation coefficients ranged from 0.341 to 0.765, indicating acceptable concurrent validity. For CFA, all factor loadings were significant at > 0.30 and generally medium to high. The simplified Chinese version of CC-SCHFI is a psychometrically reliable instrument with empirically supported validity, which can be applied to clinical evaluation of the contribution of caregivers to HF self-care. Compared with CACHS, CC-SCHFI can be more easily completed and simultaneously maintains acceptable concurrent validity. Further studies are warranted to investigate the combined use of these two instruments among other populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22441","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To translate and adapt the English version of the Caregiver Contributions to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) to Chinese, and further to investigate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of CC-SCHFI in a cohort of caregivers of people with heart failure. CC-SCHFI translation and cross-cultural adaption were performed. 240 caregivers were recruited to complete the instrument. The internal construct reliability was evaluated by Cronbach's α and item-to-total correlations. The concurrent validity was tested by using the CACHS which also measures caregivers' contribution to HF self-care. Psychometric analysis was performed with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We evaluated 4-factor structure for caregiver contribution to self-care maintenance scale, 1-factor structure for caregiver contribution to self-care management scale and 2-factor structure for confidence in contributing to self-care scale. All the subjects successfully completed the interviews in an average of 12.3 ± 3.2 min. The internal consistency reliability analysis of the CC-SCHFI showed Cronbach α of 0.83. All items showed adequate discrimination, with the item-total correlation coefficient of greater than 0.4. The scores of CC-SCHFI scales were significantly correlated with the CACHS scale scores. The correlation coefficients ranged from 0.341 to 0.765, indicating acceptable concurrent validity. For CFA, all factor loadings were significant at > 0.30 and generally medium to high. The simplified Chinese version of CC-SCHFI is a psychometrically reliable instrument with empirically supported validity, which can be applied to clinical evaluation of the contribution of caregivers to HF self-care. Compared with CACHS, CC-SCHFI can be more easily completed and simultaneously maintains acceptable concurrent validity. Further studies are warranted to investigate the combined use of these two instruments among other populations.
期刊介绍:
Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.