Perceived bioethical issues in cancer rehabilitation: a qualitative study among Italian physiotherapists.

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physiotherapy Pub Date : 2025-02-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.33393/aop.2025.3299
Gianluca Bertoni, Simone Battista, Valentina Conti, Marco Testa, Sara Patuzzo
{"title":"Perceived bioethical issues in cancer rehabilitation: a qualitative study among Italian physiotherapists.","authors":"Gianluca Bertoni, Simone Battista, Valentina Conti, Marco Testa, Sara Patuzzo","doi":"10.33393/aop.2025.3299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Literature on bioethics in physiotherapy, particularly in cancer management, is limited. This study explores the perceived bioethical issues in cancer rehabilitation by Italian physiotherapists.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Thirty-one physiotherapists (Age: 42 ± 10.5 years; 20 women, 11 men) with expertise in cancer rehabilitation were purposefully selected.</p><p><strong>Data collection: </strong>Six online focus groups were conducted, guided by a focus group guide based on existing literature and refined by experts in cancer rehabilitation and bioethics.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Sessions were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's 'Reflexive Thematic Analysis'.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four primary themes emerged: 1) <i>Challenges of (Non)-Disclosure in Diagnosis and Prognosis</i> - ethical difficulties around withholding diagnosis or prognosis information; 2) <i>Balancing Hope and Realism in Patient and Caregiver Expectations</i> - navigating hope versus realistic rehabilitation goals; 3) <i>Weighing Efficacy and Safety in Cancer Rehabilitation</i> - balancing -treatment outcomes with patient safety; 4) <i>Decisions on Withdrawing Treatment</i> - ethical considerations in discontinuing treatment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These themes highlight common ethical dilemmas faced by physiotherapists in cancer rehabilitation, mirroring broader healthcare challenges. Addressing them requires a nuanced understanding of ethical principles within the cancer rehabilitation context.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study provides insights into the bioethical issues in cancer rehabilitation, stressing the need for a patient-centered approach to navigate these challenges effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"15 ","pages":"19-31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/aop.2025.3299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Literature on bioethics in physiotherapy, particularly in cancer management, is limited. This study explores the perceived bioethical issues in cancer rehabilitation by Italian physiotherapists.

Participants: Thirty-one physiotherapists (Age: 42 ± 10.5 years; 20 women, 11 men) with expertise in cancer rehabilitation were purposefully selected.

Data collection: Six online focus groups were conducted, guided by a focus group guide based on existing literature and refined by experts in cancer rehabilitation and bioethics.

Data analysis: Sessions were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's 'Reflexive Thematic Analysis'.

Results: Four primary themes emerged: 1) Challenges of (Non)-Disclosure in Diagnosis and Prognosis - ethical difficulties around withholding diagnosis or prognosis information; 2) Balancing Hope and Realism in Patient and Caregiver Expectations - navigating hope versus realistic rehabilitation goals; 3) Weighing Efficacy and Safety in Cancer Rehabilitation - balancing -treatment outcomes with patient safety; 4) Decisions on Withdrawing Treatment - ethical considerations in discontinuing treatment.

Discussion: These themes highlight common ethical dilemmas faced by physiotherapists in cancer rehabilitation, mirroring broader healthcare challenges. Addressing them requires a nuanced understanding of ethical principles within the cancer rehabilitation context.

Conclusions: The study provides insights into the bioethical issues in cancer rehabilitation, stressing the need for a patient-centered approach to navigate these challenges effectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Scaling new heights: a pilot study of the impact of climbing on balance, agility, and dexterity in individuals with Parkinson's disease. Comparisons of the effects of psychologically-informed and usual physiotherapy on pain sensitivity in chronic low back pain: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Perceived bioethical issues in cancer rehabilitation: a qualitative study among Italian physiotherapists. Discriminative ability, responsiveness, and interpretability of smoothness index of gait in people with multiple sclerosis. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pelvic floor signs and symptoms: a scoping review of the literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1