The Perioperative Challenges of Major Lower Extremity Amputation and the Impact of Regional Anesthesia on Morbidity, Mortality, and Pain Management: A Narrative Review.

IF 1.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Cureus Pub Date : 2025-02-14 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.78983
Abdulaziz H Algain
{"title":"The Perioperative Challenges of Major Lower Extremity Amputation and the Impact of Regional Anesthesia on Morbidity, Mortality, and Pain Management: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Abdulaziz H Algain","doi":"10.7759/cureus.78983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Limb amputation can impose severe burdens on the individual and society. Regardless of the underlying cause of amputation, pain management is challenging and may impact patients' recovery and quality of life. Individuals undergoing major lower extremity amputation (MLEA) face significant perioperative risk. Therefore, anesthesiologists must meticulously customize their anesthetic approach. Regional anesthesia (RA) provides numerous physiological advantages over general anesthesia (GA) and is essential for pain management in orthopedic surgeries, standing as an excellent anesthesia method for high-risk patients and being fundamental in multimodal analgesia. This narrative review is an attempt to enhance understanding of different pain phenomena following limb amputation and to provide a critical synthesis of the existing evidence concerning the efficacy and impact of RA on morbidity, mortality, and pain management following MLEA, aiming to shed light on areas that have not received enough attention within these aspects and subsequently serve as a guide for future research. Despite the persistent controversy regarding the comparative mortality rates associated with RA versus alternative anesthetic methods for MLEA, several studies praise their efficacy in pain management and in mitigating adverse perioperative outcomes. Given that much of this data originates from retrospective studies, randomized multicenter prospective trials remain essential to validate their actual efficacy. A comprehensive analysis of the impact of RA on healthcare costs and resources related to MLEA is necessary to determine its correlation with cost reduction, decreased hospital stays, improved resource allocation, and increased patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 2","pages":"e78983"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11826496/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.78983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Limb amputation can impose severe burdens on the individual and society. Regardless of the underlying cause of amputation, pain management is challenging and may impact patients' recovery and quality of life. Individuals undergoing major lower extremity amputation (MLEA) face significant perioperative risk. Therefore, anesthesiologists must meticulously customize their anesthetic approach. Regional anesthesia (RA) provides numerous physiological advantages over general anesthesia (GA) and is essential for pain management in orthopedic surgeries, standing as an excellent anesthesia method for high-risk patients and being fundamental in multimodal analgesia. This narrative review is an attempt to enhance understanding of different pain phenomena following limb amputation and to provide a critical synthesis of the existing evidence concerning the efficacy and impact of RA on morbidity, mortality, and pain management following MLEA, aiming to shed light on areas that have not received enough attention within these aspects and subsequently serve as a guide for future research. Despite the persistent controversy regarding the comparative mortality rates associated with RA versus alternative anesthetic methods for MLEA, several studies praise their efficacy in pain management and in mitigating adverse perioperative outcomes. Given that much of this data originates from retrospective studies, randomized multicenter prospective trials remain essential to validate their actual efficacy. A comprehensive analysis of the impact of RA on healthcare costs and resources related to MLEA is necessary to determine its correlation with cost reduction, decreased hospital stays, improved resource allocation, and increased patient satisfaction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下肢大截肢围手术期的挑战和区域麻醉对发病率、死亡率和疼痛管理的影响:一篇叙述性综述。
截肢会给个人和社会带来严重的负担。无论截肢的根本原因是什么,疼痛管理都是具有挑战性的,可能会影响患者的康复和生活质量。接受大下肢截肢(MLEA)的个体面临显著的围手术期风险。因此,麻醉师必须精心定制他们的麻醉方法。区域麻醉(RA)与全麻(GA)相比具有许多生理上的优势,是骨科手术中疼痛管理的必要条件,是高危患者的一种优秀麻醉方法,也是多模式镇痛的基础。这篇叙述性综述试图加强对截肢后不同疼痛现象的理解,并提供有关风湿性关节炎对MLEA后发病率、死亡率和疼痛管理的疗效和影响的现有证据的关键综合,旨在阐明在这些方面尚未得到足够重视的领域,并随后为未来的研究提供指导。尽管关于风湿性关节炎与MLEA替代麻醉方法相关的比较死亡率存在持续的争议,但一些研究赞扬了它们在疼痛管理和减轻不良围手术期结果方面的功效。考虑到大部分数据来自回顾性研究,随机多中心前瞻性试验仍然是验证其实际疗效的必要条件。有必要对RA对医疗成本和与MLEA相关的资源的影响进行全面分析,以确定其与降低成本、减少住院时间、改善资源分配和提高患者满意度的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Adaptive Digital Interventions Triggered by Passive Sensing for Sleep Improvement in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Correction: A Case Report of Plasmacytoma in a 28-Year-Old Patient: Bridging the Age Gap in a Rare Presentation. Determination of the Accuracy of Computed Tomography in Staging Primary Rectal Carcinoma and Lymph Node Spread Post Chemoradiation Therapy. Acute Reversible Convergent Strabismus Following Accidental Lorazepam Ingestion in a Child: A Rare Ocular Manifestation of Benzodiazepine Toxicity. Correction: Assessment of Skeletal Maturity in a Sample of the Saudi Population Using Cervical Vertebrae and Frontal Sinus Index: A Cephalometric Study Using Artificial Intelligence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1