IRMA: Machine learning-based harmonization of $$^{18}$$ F-FDG PET brain scans in multi-center studies

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1007/s00259-025-07114-4
S.S. Lövdal, R. van Veen, G. Carli, R. J. Renken, T. Shiner, N. Bregman, R. Orad, D. Arnaldi, B. Orso, S. Morbelli, P. Mattioli, K. L. Leenders, R. Dierckx, S. K. Meles, M. Biehl
{"title":"IRMA: Machine learning-based harmonization of $$^{18}$$ F-FDG PET brain scans in multi-center studies","authors":"S.S. Lövdal, R. van Veen, G. Carli, R. J. Renken, T. Shiner, N. Bregman, R. Orad, D. Arnaldi, B. Orso, S. Morbelli, P. Mattioli, K. L. Leenders, R. Dierckx, S. K. Meles, M. Biehl","doi":"10.1007/s00259-025-07114-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Center-specific effects in PET brain scans arise due to differences in technical and procedural aspects. This restricts the merging of data between centers and introduces source-specific bias.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We demonstrate the use of the recently proposed machine learning method Iterated Relevance Matrix Analysis (IRMA) for harmonization of center-specific effects in brain <span>\\(^{18}\\)</span>F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (<span>\\(^{18}\\)</span>F-FDG) PET scans. The center difference is learned by applying IRMA on PCA-based feature vectors of healthy controls (HC), resulting in a subspace <span>\\(\\varvec{V}\\)</span>, representing information not comparable between centers, and the remaining subspace <span>\\(\\varvec{U}\\)</span>, where no center differences are present. In this proof-of-concept study, we demonstrate the properties of the method using data from four centers. After center-harmonization, a Generalized Matrix Learning Vector Quantization (GMLVQ) model was trained to discriminate between Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease and Dementia with Lewy Bodies.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>At the initial IRMA iteration, the system was able to determine the center origin of the four HC cohorts almost perfectly. The method required six iterations, corresponding to a six-dimensional subspace <span>\\(\\varvec{V}\\)</span>, to determine the entire center difference. An uncorrected disease classification model was highly biased to center-specific effects, creating a falsely inflated performance when applying internal (cross-) validation. The cross-validation performance of the center-harmonized model remained high, while it generalized significantly better to unseen test cohorts. Furthermore, the framework is highly transparent, providing analytic reconstructions of the correction and visualizations of the data in voxel space.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>IRMA can be used to learn and disregard center-specific information in features extracted from brain <span>\\(^{18}\\)</span>F-FDG PET scans, while retaining disease-specific information.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07114-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Center-specific effects in PET brain scans arise due to differences in technical and procedural aspects. This restricts the merging of data between centers and introduces source-specific bias.

Methods

We demonstrate the use of the recently proposed machine learning method Iterated Relevance Matrix Analysis (IRMA) for harmonization of center-specific effects in brain \(^{18}\)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (\(^{18}\)F-FDG) PET scans. The center difference is learned by applying IRMA on PCA-based feature vectors of healthy controls (HC), resulting in a subspace \(\varvec{V}\), representing information not comparable between centers, and the remaining subspace \(\varvec{U}\), where no center differences are present. In this proof-of-concept study, we demonstrate the properties of the method using data from four centers. After center-harmonization, a Generalized Matrix Learning Vector Quantization (GMLVQ) model was trained to discriminate between Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease and Dementia with Lewy Bodies.

Results

At the initial IRMA iteration, the system was able to determine the center origin of the four HC cohorts almost perfectly. The method required six iterations, corresponding to a six-dimensional subspace \(\varvec{V}\), to determine the entire center difference. An uncorrected disease classification model was highly biased to center-specific effects, creating a falsely inflated performance when applying internal (cross-) validation. The cross-validation performance of the center-harmonized model remained high, while it generalized significantly better to unseen test cohorts. Furthermore, the framework is highly transparent, providing analytic reconstructions of the correction and visualizations of the data in voxel space.

Conclusion

IRMA can be used to learn and disregard center-specific information in features extracted from brain \(^{18}\)F-FDG PET scans, while retaining disease-specific information.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IRMA:多中心研究中基于机器学习的$$^{18}$$ F-FDG PET脑部扫描协调
目的PET脑部扫描的特异性效应是由于技术和程序方面的差异而产生的。这限制了中心之间数据的合并,并引入了特定源的偏差。方法我们展示了使用最近提出的机器学习方法迭代相关矩阵分析(IRMA)来协调大脑中中心特异性效应\(^{18}\) f -氟脱氧葡萄糖(\(^{18}\) F-FDG) PET扫描。通过在健康对照(HC)的基于pca的特征向量上应用IRMA来学习中心差异,产生一个子空间\(\varvec{V}\),表示中心之间不具有可比性的信息,以及剩余的子空间\(\varvec{U}\),其中不存在中心差异。在这个概念验证研究中,我们使用来自四个中心的数据来演示该方法的特性。在中心协调后,训练广义矩阵学习向量量化(GMLVQ)模型来区分帕金森病、阿尔茨海默病和路易体痴呆。结果在最初的IRMA迭代中,该系统能够几乎完美地确定4个HC队列的中心起源。该方法需要六次迭代,对应于一个六维子空间\(\varvec{V}\),以确定整个中心差。未校正的疾病分类模型高度偏向于中心特异性效应,在应用内部(交叉)验证时产生错误的夸大表现。中心协调模型的交叉验证性能仍然很高,但它对未见过的测试队列的泛化效果明显更好。此外,该框架是高度透明的,在体素空间中提供数据的校正和可视化的分析重建。结论irma可用于学习和忽略脑部\(^{18}\) F-FDG PET扫描中提取的中心特异性信息,同时保留疾病特异性信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
期刊最新文献
Ternary classification prediction and heterogeneity quantification for HER2-Zero, -low, and -positive in breast cancer using HER2-targeted PET/CT imaging. Amino acid PET imaging to monitor mIDH inhibitor treatments in patients with refractory IDH-mutant gliomas. Translational perspective on myocardial αvβ3-integrin imaging after infarction. Enhanced accuracy of cardiac 82Rb PET functional parameters with 16-compared to 8-gated imaging on a long-axial-field-of-view PET system: validation against echocardiography. Assessment of nephrotoxicity following lutetium-177 PSMA I&T radioligand therapy: a comparative study with docetaxel chemotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1