Ipilimumab plus nivolumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with melanoma brain metastases (ABC): 7-year follow-up of a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 study

Georgina V Long, Victoria Atkinson, Serigne N Lo, Alexander D Guminski, Shahneen K Sandhu, Michael P Brown, Maria Gonzalez, Grant A McArthur, Alexander M Menzies
{"title":"Ipilimumab plus nivolumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with melanoma brain metastases (ABC): 7-year follow-up of a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 study","authors":"Georgina V Long, Victoria Atkinson, Serigne N Lo, Alexander D Guminski, Shahneen K Sandhu, Michael P Brown, Maria Gonzalez, Grant A McArthur, Alexander M Menzies","doi":"10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00735-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Patients with melanoma brain metastases respond well to immunotherapy, but long-term comparative survival data are scarce. We aimed to assess the efficacy of ipilimumab plus nivolumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with melanoma brain metastases at 7 years.<h3>Methods</h3>This open-label, randomised, phase 2 study was conducted at four sites (two research institute cancer centres and two university teaching hospitals) in Australia. Patients aged 18 years or older with active, immunotherapy-naive melanoma brain metastases and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2 were eligible. Asymptomatic patients with no previous brain-directed therapy were randomly assigned (5:4) using the biased-coin minimisation method (after a safety run-in of six patients) to cohort A (intravenous ipilimumab 3 mg/kg plus nivolumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses, then nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) or cohort B (intravenous nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks). Patients with previous brain-directed therapy, neurological symptoms, or leptomeningeal disease were assigned to cohort C (non-randomised; intravenous nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks). The primary endpoint was best intracranial response (complete or partial response) from week 12. Secondary survival endpoints included intracranial progression-free survival and overall survival. Safety was assessed from the first dose of treatment to at least 100 days after treatment discontinuation. Analyses were performed in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The main analysis has been reported, and this is a long-term follow up of the ABC trial. This trial is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT02374242</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, and is ongoing.<h3>Findings</h3>Between Nov 4, 2014, and April 21, 2017, 89 patients were assessed for eligibility, 79 of whom were enrolled and assigned to cohort A (n=36), cohort B (n=27), or cohort C (n=16). Three patients (one in cohort A and two in cohort B) were excluded due to ineligibility. 17 (22%) of 76 patients were female and 59 (78%) were male. At data cutoff (March 26, 2024), the median follow-up was 7·6 years (IQR 6·9–8·2). Overall intracranial responses occurred in 18 (51% [95% CI 34–69]) patients from cohort A, five (20% [7–41]) from cohort B, and one (6% [0–30]) from cohort C. 7-year intracranial progression-free survival was 42% (95% CI 29–63) in cohort A, 15% (6–39) in cohort B, and 6% (1–42) in cohort C. 7-year overall survival was 48% (34–68) in cohort A, 26% (13–51) in cohort B, and 13% (3–46) in cohort C. Safety results were consistent with the primary analysis. 50 patients died, including 18 (51%) from cohort A, 18 (72%) from cohort B, and 14 (88%) from cohort C.<h3>Interpretation</h3>Our findings suggest that ipilimumab plus nivolumab maintains efficacy to at least 7 years in patients with active asymptomatic brain metastasis. Upfront ipilimumab plus nivolumab should be the standard of care for patients with melanoma brain metastasis; a trial investigating the role of stereotactic surgery in this new paradigm is ongoing.<h3>Funding</h3>Melanoma Institute Australia and Bristol Myers Squibb.","PeriodicalId":22865,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Oncology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00735-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients with melanoma brain metastases respond well to immunotherapy, but long-term comparative survival data are scarce. We aimed to assess the efficacy of ipilimumab plus nivolumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with melanoma brain metastases at 7 years.

Methods

This open-label, randomised, phase 2 study was conducted at four sites (two research institute cancer centres and two university teaching hospitals) in Australia. Patients aged 18 years or older with active, immunotherapy-naive melanoma brain metastases and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2 were eligible. Asymptomatic patients with no previous brain-directed therapy were randomly assigned (5:4) using the biased-coin minimisation method (after a safety run-in of six patients) to cohort A (intravenous ipilimumab 3 mg/kg plus nivolumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses, then nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) or cohort B (intravenous nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks). Patients with previous brain-directed therapy, neurological symptoms, or leptomeningeal disease were assigned to cohort C (non-randomised; intravenous nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks). The primary endpoint was best intracranial response (complete or partial response) from week 12. Secondary survival endpoints included intracranial progression-free survival and overall survival. Safety was assessed from the first dose of treatment to at least 100 days after treatment discontinuation. Analyses were performed in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The main analysis has been reported, and this is a long-term follow up of the ABC trial. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02374242, and is ongoing.

Findings

Between Nov 4, 2014, and April 21, 2017, 89 patients were assessed for eligibility, 79 of whom were enrolled and assigned to cohort A (n=36), cohort B (n=27), or cohort C (n=16). Three patients (one in cohort A and two in cohort B) were excluded due to ineligibility. 17 (22%) of 76 patients were female and 59 (78%) were male. At data cutoff (March 26, 2024), the median follow-up was 7·6 years (IQR 6·9–8·2). Overall intracranial responses occurred in 18 (51% [95% CI 34–69]) patients from cohort A, five (20% [7–41]) from cohort B, and one (6% [0–30]) from cohort C. 7-year intracranial progression-free survival was 42% (95% CI 29–63) in cohort A, 15% (6–39) in cohort B, and 6% (1–42) in cohort C. 7-year overall survival was 48% (34–68) in cohort A, 26% (13–51) in cohort B, and 13% (3–46) in cohort C. Safety results were consistent with the primary analysis. 50 patients died, including 18 (51%) from cohort A, 18 (72%) from cohort B, and 14 (88%) from cohort C.

Interpretation

Our findings suggest that ipilimumab plus nivolumab maintains efficacy to at least 7 years in patients with active asymptomatic brain metastasis. Upfront ipilimumab plus nivolumab should be the standard of care for patients with melanoma brain metastasis; a trial investigating the role of stereotactic surgery in this new paradigm is ongoing.

Funding

Melanoma Institute Australia and Bristol Myers Squibb.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ipilimumab联合纳武单抗与单独纳武单抗治疗黑色素瘤脑转移(ABC)患者:一项多中心、开放标签、随机、2期研究的7年随访
黑素瘤脑转移患者对免疫治疗反应良好,但长期比较生存数据很少。我们的目的是评估伊匹单抗联合纳武单抗与单独纳武单抗在7年黑色素瘤脑转移患者中的疗效。方法这项开放标签、随机、2期研究在澳大利亚的4个地点(2个研究机构癌症中心和2个大学教学医院)进行。年龄在18岁及以上的未接受免疫治疗的活动性黑色素瘤脑转移患者,东部肿瘤合作组的表现状态为0-2。无既往脑定向治疗的无症状患者使用偏置最小化方法(在6例患者的安全运行后)随机分配(5:4)到队列a(每3周静脉注射伊匹单抗3mg /kg加纳武单抗1mg /kg,共4次,然后每2周静脉注射纳武单抗3mg /kg)或队列B(每2周静脉注射纳武单抗3mg /kg)。既往有脑导向治疗、神经系统症状或轻脑膜疾病的患者被分配到队列C(非随机;静脉注射纳武单抗3mg /kg每2周)。主要终点是第12周的最佳颅内反应(完全或部分反应)。次要生存终点包括颅内无进展生存期和总生存期。安全性从第一次给药到停药后至少100天进行评估。对接受至少一剂研究药物的患者进行分析。主要分析已被报道,这是ABC试验的长期随访。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT02374242,目前正在进行中。在2014年11月4日至2017年4月21日期间,对89名患者进行了资格评估,其中79名患者入组并分配到队列A (n=36)、队列B (n=27)或队列C (n=16)。3例患者(1例在队列A中,2例在队列B中)因不合格而被排除。76例患者中女性17例(22%),男性59例(78%)。截至数据截止日期(2024年3月26日),中位随访时间为7.6年(IQR为6.9 - 8.2)。队列A中有18例(51% [95% CI 34-69])患者出现颅内反应,队列B中有5例(20%[7-41])患者出现颅内反应,队列c中有1例(6%[0-30])患者出现颅内反应。队列A的7年无进展生存率为42% (95% CI 29-63),队列B为15%(6-39),队列c为6%(1-42)。队列A的7年总生存率为48%(34-68),队列B为26%(13-51),队列c为13%(3-46)。安全性结果与初步分析一致。50例患者死亡,其中18例(51%)来自A队列,18例(72%)来自B队列,14例(88%)来自c队列。我们的研究结果表明,易普利姆单抗联合纳武单抗对活动性无症状脑转移患者的疗效至少维持7年。ipilimumab + nivolumab应该成为黑色素瘤脑转移患者的标准治疗方案;一项研究立体定向手术在这种新模式中的作用的试验正在进行中。资助澳大利亚黑色素瘤研究所和Bristol Myers Squibb。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Jordan launches new national cancer strategy FDA fast-tracks first inhalable gene therapy for lung cancer Towards response-adapted neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment Nomogram-based risk classification for predicting response to metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy in PSMA PET-staged oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PORTAL): an international, retrospective cohort study Influence of stage at cancer diagnosis on NHS hospital care costs in England: a national, retrospective, population-based cohort study using individual patient-level data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1