Development of a computationally efficient CFD model for vertical-axis hydrokinetic turbines: A critical assessment

IF 4.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Ocean Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.120692
Omar S. Mohamed , Pier Francesco Melani , Giuseppe Soraperra , Alessandra Brighenti , Giovanni Ferrara , Vittorino Betti , Francesco Balduzzi , Alessandro Bianchini
{"title":"Development of a computationally efficient CFD model for vertical-axis hydrokinetic turbines: A critical assessment","authors":"Omar S. Mohamed ,&nbsp;Pier Francesco Melani ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Soraperra ,&nbsp;Alessandra Brighenti ,&nbsp;Giovanni Ferrara ,&nbsp;Vittorino Betti ,&nbsp;Francesco Balduzzi ,&nbsp;Alessandro Bianchini","doi":"10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.120692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Darrieus-type vertical axis turbines are suitable for hydrokinetic applications, particularly when deployed in arrays within rivers and small watercourses. However, modelling their complex and unsteady hydrodynamic interactions, both among turbines and with channel boundaries and free water surface, remains a significant challenge. This study develops a computationally-efficient Actuator Cylinder (AC) model that is coupled for the first time with the Volume of Fluid (VOF) method to account for free water surface variations. The proposed AC model calculates instantaneous blade forces, but simplifies them by projecting only the average forces, eliminating dependence on time-step size. The new approach, developed with the CFD code Ansys Fluent, has been validated against experiments and benchmarked with a higher-fidelity Actuator Line Method (ALM). Results indicate that the AC model provides reasonably accurate estimates of turbine performance, as well as the impact of the turbines on the flow field within the channel. For a stand-alone turbine, the AC model shows close alignment with the ALM, with a maximum difference of only 3.5% for the power coefficient. However, in array simulations, the AC model tends to underestimate the performance. Compared to the ALM, which more closely matches experimental data, the AC model overestimates the upstream water rise due to turbine-channel interactions and underestimates the power augmentation seen in Darrieus turbine arrays. Overall, the AC model offers an acceptable balance between accuracy and computational efficiency, significantly reducing computational time by one order of magnitude compared to the ALM. This makes the proposed CFD-AC-VOF model a practical tool for rapid and cost-effective analysis, in particular for the industrial sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19403,"journal":{"name":"Ocean Engineering","volume":"324 ","pages":"Article 120692"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002980182500407X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Darrieus-type vertical axis turbines are suitable for hydrokinetic applications, particularly when deployed in arrays within rivers and small watercourses. However, modelling their complex and unsteady hydrodynamic interactions, both among turbines and with channel boundaries and free water surface, remains a significant challenge. This study develops a computationally-efficient Actuator Cylinder (AC) model that is coupled for the first time with the Volume of Fluid (VOF) method to account for free water surface variations. The proposed AC model calculates instantaneous blade forces, but simplifies them by projecting only the average forces, eliminating dependence on time-step size. The new approach, developed with the CFD code Ansys Fluent, has been validated against experiments and benchmarked with a higher-fidelity Actuator Line Method (ALM). Results indicate that the AC model provides reasonably accurate estimates of turbine performance, as well as the impact of the turbines on the flow field within the channel. For a stand-alone turbine, the AC model shows close alignment with the ALM, with a maximum difference of only 3.5% for the power coefficient. However, in array simulations, the AC model tends to underestimate the performance. Compared to the ALM, which more closely matches experimental data, the AC model overestimates the upstream water rise due to turbine-channel interactions and underestimates the power augmentation seen in Darrieus turbine arrays. Overall, the AC model offers an acceptable balance between accuracy and computational efficiency, significantly reducing computational time by one order of magnitude compared to the ALM. This makes the proposed CFD-AC-VOF model a practical tool for rapid and cost-effective analysis, in particular for the industrial sector.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean Engineering
Ocean Engineering 工程技术-工程:大洋
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
34.00%
发文量
2379
审稿时长
8.1 months
期刊介绍: Ocean Engineering provides a medium for the publication of original research and development work in the field of ocean engineering. Ocean Engineering seeks papers in the following topics.
期刊最新文献
A method for generating multiple hull forms at once using MLP (Multi-Layer Perceptron) Study on the hydrodynamic characteristics of an outboard engine propeller with hydrophobic coating An enhanced Lévy flight quantum particle swarm optimization for stress monitoring in jacket wind turbines Numerical investigations of the successive wave strike processes on the coastal slope dike using OpenFOAM® Numerical study on a new floating breakwater with openings, arc-shaped wings, and plates using the SPH method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1