A Trust Incentive Driven Feedback Mechanism With Risk Attitude for Group Consensus in Social Networks

IF 8.7 1区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1109/TSMC.2024.3519510
Feixia Ji;Jian Wu;Francisco Chiclana;Qi Sun;Enrique Herrera-Viedma
{"title":"A Trust Incentive Driven Feedback Mechanism With Risk Attitude for Group Consensus in Social Networks","authors":"Feixia Ji;Jian Wu;Francisco Chiclana;Qi Sun;Enrique Herrera-Viedma","doi":"10.1109/TSMC.2024.3519510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trust relationships can facilitate cooperation in collective decisions. Using behavioral incentives via trust to encourage voluntary preference adjustments improves consensus through mutual agreement. This article aims to establish a trust incentive-driven framework for enabling consensus in social network group decision making (SN-GDM). First, a trust incentive mechanism is modeled via interactive trust functions that integrate risk attitude. The inclusion of risk attitude is crucial as it reflects the diverse ways decision makers (DMs) respond to uncertainty in trusting others’ judgments, capturing the varied behaviors of risky, neutral, and insurance DMs in the consensus process. Inconsistent DMs then adjust opinions in exchange for heightened trust. This mechanism enhances the importance degrees via a new weight assignment method, serving as a reward to motivate DMs to further align with the majority. Subsequently, a trust incentive-driven bounded maximum consensus model is proposed to optimize cooperation dynamics while preventing over-compensation of adjustments. Simulations and comparative analysis demonstrate the model’s efficacy in facilitating cooperation through tailored trust incentive mechanisms that account for these diverse risk preferences. Finally, the approach is applied to evaluate candidates for the Norden Shipping Scholarship, providing a cooperation-focused SN-GDM framework for achieving mutually agreeable solutions while acknowledging the impact of individual risk attitude on trust-based interactions.","PeriodicalId":48915,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems","volume":"55 3","pages":"2133-2146"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10819693/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trust relationships can facilitate cooperation in collective decisions. Using behavioral incentives via trust to encourage voluntary preference adjustments improves consensus through mutual agreement. This article aims to establish a trust incentive-driven framework for enabling consensus in social network group decision making (SN-GDM). First, a trust incentive mechanism is modeled via interactive trust functions that integrate risk attitude. The inclusion of risk attitude is crucial as it reflects the diverse ways decision makers (DMs) respond to uncertainty in trusting others’ judgments, capturing the varied behaviors of risky, neutral, and insurance DMs in the consensus process. Inconsistent DMs then adjust opinions in exchange for heightened trust. This mechanism enhances the importance degrees via a new weight assignment method, serving as a reward to motivate DMs to further align with the majority. Subsequently, a trust incentive-driven bounded maximum consensus model is proposed to optimize cooperation dynamics while preventing over-compensation of adjustments. Simulations and comparative analysis demonstrate the model’s efficacy in facilitating cooperation through tailored trust incentive mechanisms that account for these diverse risk preferences. Finally, the approach is applied to evaluate candidates for the Norden Shipping Scholarship, providing a cooperation-focused SN-GDM framework for achieving mutually agreeable solutions while acknowledging the impact of individual risk attitude on trust-based interactions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于风险态度的社会网络群体共识信任激励反馈机制
信任关系可以促进集体决策中的合作。通过信任使用行为激励来鼓励自愿偏好调整,通过相互同意来提高共识。本文旨在建立一个信任激励驱动的框架,以实现社会网络群体决策(SN-GDM)中的共识。首先,通过整合风险态度的互动信任函数建立信任激励机制。风险态度的包含是至关重要的,因为它反映了决策者(dm)在信任他人判断时对不确定性的不同反应方式,在共识过程中捕捉风险、中立和保险dm的不同行为。不一致的DMs然后调整意见以换取更高的信任。这种机制通过一种新的权重分配方法增强了重要性程度,作为奖励来激励dm进一步与大多数人保持一致。在此基础上,提出了一种基于信任激励的有界最大共识模型,以优化合作动态,同时防止调整的过度补偿。模拟和比较分析表明,该模型通过考虑这些不同风险偏好的定制信任激励机制,在促进合作方面具有功效。最后,该方法被应用于评估诺登航运奖学金的候选人,提供了一个以合作为重点的SN-GDM框架,以实现相互同意的解决方案,同时承认个人风险态度对基于信任的互动的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
CiteScore
18.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
812
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems encompasses the fields of systems engineering, covering issue formulation, analysis, and modeling throughout the systems engineering lifecycle phases. It addresses decision-making, issue interpretation, systems management, processes, and various methods such as optimization, modeling, and simulation in the development and deployment of large systems.
期刊最新文献
Introducing IEEE Collabratec Introducing IEEE Collabratec IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society Information IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems Information for Authors TechRxiv: Share Your Preprint Research With the World!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1