Dietary Counselling Interventions in Malnutrition Research: Achieving an International Consensus on Best Practices Using an Amended Delphi Process

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1111/jhn.70028
C. Elizabeth Weekes, Marian A. E. de van der Schueren, Heather Keller, Alison Steiber, Skye Marshall, Su Lin Lim, Christine Baldwin
{"title":"Dietary Counselling Interventions in Malnutrition Research: Achieving an International Consensus on Best Practices Using an Amended Delphi Process","authors":"C. Elizabeth Weekes,&nbsp;Marian A. E. de van der Schueren,&nbsp;Heather Keller,&nbsp;Alison Steiber,&nbsp;Skye Marshall,&nbsp;Su Lin Lim,&nbsp;Christine Baldwin","doi":"10.1111/jhn.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The evidence for the use of dietary counselling interventions in the management of malnutrition is inconsistent. Lack of consistency limits the ability to compare studies, impacting research, clinical practice and policy development.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To establish an international consensus on minimum requirements for dietary counselling interventions used for the prevention and management of malnutrition in adults in a clinical research context.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An international expert panel with seven members was formed. An amended Delphi study was conducted with 37 initial consensus statements generated from a targeted search of the literature. The agreement was assessed across two Delphi rounds and two online meetings. The full consensus was defined as the assignment of a score of 5 (strongly agree). A preliminary external validation was conducted with clinical and/or research dietetic professionals when delegates at the International Congress of Dietetics (ICD) 2021 voted during an online meeting on agreement with statements relating to patient assessment and delivery of a dietary counselling intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Consensus was achieved for 27 statements across four themes, with justifications and commentary. Minimum requirements included eight statements for ‘nutritional assessment’ (theme 1), seven for ‘nutritional intervention content’ (theme 2), five for ‘nutritional intervention delivery’ (theme 3) and seven for ‘monitoring and follow-up’ (theme 4). The ICD delegates voted on elements of assessment (77 of 140 delegates in agreement) and delivery of the intervention (37 of 101 delegates in agreement), demonstrating that consensus on these aspects of nutritional support interventions was low to moderate in this delegate sample.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Consensus was achieved by an international group of experts to define the minimum essential factors for delivering dietary counselling interventions for the management of malnutrition in a research context; however, further external validation is required. The minimum requirements have the potential to influence research, clinical practice and policy development.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jhn.70028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.70028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The evidence for the use of dietary counselling interventions in the management of malnutrition is inconsistent. Lack of consistency limits the ability to compare studies, impacting research, clinical practice and policy development.

Aims

To establish an international consensus on minimum requirements for dietary counselling interventions used for the prevention and management of malnutrition in adults in a clinical research context.

Methods

An international expert panel with seven members was formed. An amended Delphi study was conducted with 37 initial consensus statements generated from a targeted search of the literature. The agreement was assessed across two Delphi rounds and two online meetings. The full consensus was defined as the assignment of a score of 5 (strongly agree). A preliminary external validation was conducted with clinical and/or research dietetic professionals when delegates at the International Congress of Dietetics (ICD) 2021 voted during an online meeting on agreement with statements relating to patient assessment and delivery of a dietary counselling intervention.

Results

Consensus was achieved for 27 statements across four themes, with justifications and commentary. Minimum requirements included eight statements for ‘nutritional assessment’ (theme 1), seven for ‘nutritional intervention content’ (theme 2), five for ‘nutritional intervention delivery’ (theme 3) and seven for ‘monitoring and follow-up’ (theme 4). The ICD delegates voted on elements of assessment (77 of 140 delegates in agreement) and delivery of the intervention (37 of 101 delegates in agreement), demonstrating that consensus on these aspects of nutritional support interventions was low to moderate in this delegate sample.

Conclusions

Consensus was achieved by an international group of experts to define the minimum essential factors for delivering dietary counselling interventions for the management of malnutrition in a research context; however, further external validation is required. The minimum requirements have the potential to influence research, clinical practice and policy development.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing papers in applied nutrition and dietetics. Papers are therefore welcomed on: - Clinical nutrition and the practice of therapeutic dietetics - Clinical and professional guidelines - Public health nutrition and nutritional epidemiology - Dietary surveys and dietary assessment methodology - Health promotion and intervention studies and their effectiveness - Obesity, weight control and body composition - Research on psychological determinants of healthy and unhealthy eating behaviour. Focus can for example be on attitudes, brain correlates of food reward processing, social influences, impulsivity, cognitive control, cognitive processes, dieting, psychological treatments. - Appetite, Food intake and nutritional status - Nutrigenomics and molecular nutrition - The journal does not publish animal research The journal is published in an online-only format. No printed issue of this title will be produced but authors will still be able to order offprints of their own articles.
期刊最新文献
i-REBOUND Cook Well After Stroke: Co-Designing a Culinary Nutrition Programme for Australian Stroke Survivors. Exploring the Perspectives of Healthcare Consumers Towards the Integration of Nutrition in Routine Multiple Sclerosis Care: A Qualitative Study Mindfulness-Based Eating Solution (MBES) for Body Dissatisfaction and Disordered Eating Attitudes in Nutrition Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomised Clinical Trial Impact of a Recipe Kit Scheme (BRITE Box) on Cooking and Food-Related Behaviours of Children and Families: Exploring Parental/Carer Views Adherence to Nutritional Counselling Goals Among Pregnant Women With Overweight and Its Effect on Perinatal Health Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1