Environmental and health effects of the Barcelona superblocks.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMC Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1186/s12889-025-21835-z
Katherine Pérez, Laia Palència, Maria José López, Brenda Biaani León-Gómez, Anna Puig-Ribera, Anna Gómez-Gutiérrez, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, Glòria Carrasco-Turigas, Carme Borrell
{"title":"Environmental and health effects of the Barcelona superblocks.","authors":"Katherine Pérez, Laia Palència, Maria José López, Brenda Biaani León-Gómez, Anna Puig-Ribera, Anna Gómez-Gutiérrez, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, Glòria Carrasco-Turigas, Carme Borrell","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-21835-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The superblocks model of Barcelona (Spain) seeks to reorganize the city based on reversing the distribution of public space between vehicles and people by prioritizing citizens, thus improving their environmental conditions and quality of life. The objective of this paper was to describe the effects on environmental, health and quality of life of the first three superblocks implemented, discuss the lessons learned, and provide recommendations for the future.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The evaluation included different approaches depending on the superblock analyzed: A pre-post-intervention health survey, environmental measures of air quality, the Microscale Audit of Urban Landscapes for Pedestrians (MAPS), an observational study on target areas of physical activity (SOPARC), ethnographic guerrilla studies, and focus groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Residents and workers in all three of the evaluated superblocks reported a perceived improvement in well-being, tranquillity and quality of sleep, some reduction in noise and pollution and an increase in social interaction. The built environment of the superblocks clearly influenced walkability, and the lower car traffic volume improved air quality measures. In one of the superblocks, the same intervention calmed traffic in one of the areas but not in another.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although on a small scale, this evaluation of the environmental, and health effects of the superblocks provides support for expanding the model to other areas of the city.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"634"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831821/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21835-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The superblocks model of Barcelona (Spain) seeks to reorganize the city based on reversing the distribution of public space between vehicles and people by prioritizing citizens, thus improving their environmental conditions and quality of life. The objective of this paper was to describe the effects on environmental, health and quality of life of the first three superblocks implemented, discuss the lessons learned, and provide recommendations for the future.

Methods: The evaluation included different approaches depending on the superblock analyzed: A pre-post-intervention health survey, environmental measures of air quality, the Microscale Audit of Urban Landscapes for Pedestrians (MAPS), an observational study on target areas of physical activity (SOPARC), ethnographic guerrilla studies, and focus groups.

Results: Residents and workers in all three of the evaluated superblocks reported a perceived improvement in well-being, tranquillity and quality of sleep, some reduction in noise and pollution and an increase in social interaction. The built environment of the superblocks clearly influenced walkability, and the lower car traffic volume improved air quality measures. In one of the superblocks, the same intervention calmed traffic in one of the areas but not in another.

Conclusions: Although on a small scale, this evaluation of the environmental, and health effects of the superblocks provides support for expanding the model to other areas of the city.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴塞罗那超级街区的环境和健康影响。
背景:巴塞罗那(西班牙)的超级街区模式旨在通过优先考虑市民,扭转公共空间在车辆和人之间的分布,从而重新组织城市,从而改善他们的环境条件和生活质量。本文的目的是描述前三个实施的超级街区对环境、健康和生活质量的影响,讨论吸取的经验教训,并为今后提供建议。方法:根据分析的超级街区,采用不同的评估方法:干预前-干预后健康调查、空气质量环境措施、城市行人景观微观审计(MAPS)、体育活动目标区观察研究(SOPARC)、民族志游击研究和焦点小组。结果:所有三个被评估的超级街区的居民和工人都报告说,他们的幸福感、宁静和睡眠质量都有所改善,噪音和污染有所减少,社交互动有所增加。超级街区的建成环境明显影响了步行性,较低的汽车交通量改善了空气质量措施。在其中一个超级街区,同样的干预措施使其中一个区域的交通平静下来,但在另一个区域却没有。结论:虽然规模很小,但对超级街区的环境和健康影响的评估为将该模型扩展到城市的其他地区提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
期刊最新文献
Frameworks for developing and evaluating public health interventions in primary prevention and health promotion: a scoping review. Parental education, screen time and oral health: a cross-sectional study among adolescents. Actual conditions of working caregiver family members during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Perceptions, Preparedness, and Anticipated Challenges of Healthcare Workers and Communities for Potential Marburg virus outbreaks in South Omo, Southern Ethiopia, 2025: a qualitative case study. Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment did not show protective effect for severe COVID-19 outcomes - a nationwide register study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1