Todd P Gilmer, Kimberly Center, Natalie J Romero, Lila Burgos, Joelle Greene, Elizabeth Siantz, Lawrence A Palinkas, Amy E Lansing
{"title":"Community Impact of Capacity-Building to Develop Trauma Resilient Communities.","authors":"Todd P Gilmer, Kimberly Center, Natalie J Romero, Lila Burgos, Joelle Greene, Elizabeth Siantz, Lawrence A Palinkas, Amy E Lansing","doi":"10.1007/s10488-024-01429-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper explores the impact of an initiative designed to promote trauma resilient communities by mitigating social determinants of health and reducing health disparities through capacity-building partnerships. Nine regional partnerships in Los Angeles County were funded to build community capacity to adapt to and recover from traumatic events through outreach and engagement with community members, training related to the impact of trauma, linkages of community members to existing services, and developing new services for target populations. Primary quantitative and qualitative data on community impact were gathered from agency leads (N = 10), partnership members (N = 136), and community members (N = 42). A convergent sequential mixed methods design (qual → QUAN → qual) was selected to provide both breadth and depth of understanding about the impact of community capacity-building from multiple perspectives. From January 2018 through July 2023, partnerships conducted over 30,000 community capacity-building activities with over 1.4 M community members and created 101,370 successful linkages to resources and services among 12,663 unique community members. Agency leads, partnership members, and community members converged on three main themes describing the initiative's impact: (1) Building more empowered and resilient communities; (2) Normalizing help-seeking and reducing the stigma of mental health; and (3) Connections within partnerships/families and with community members. On average, 82% of partnership members endorsed medium to large positive changes in the impacts identified during qualitative analysis. Future work should examine whether contracting with community-based organizations is an effective approach for health systems to promote health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-024-01429-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper explores the impact of an initiative designed to promote trauma resilient communities by mitigating social determinants of health and reducing health disparities through capacity-building partnerships. Nine regional partnerships in Los Angeles County were funded to build community capacity to adapt to and recover from traumatic events through outreach and engagement with community members, training related to the impact of trauma, linkages of community members to existing services, and developing new services for target populations. Primary quantitative and qualitative data on community impact were gathered from agency leads (N = 10), partnership members (N = 136), and community members (N = 42). A convergent sequential mixed methods design (qual → QUAN → qual) was selected to provide both breadth and depth of understanding about the impact of community capacity-building from multiple perspectives. From January 2018 through July 2023, partnerships conducted over 30,000 community capacity-building activities with over 1.4 M community members and created 101,370 successful linkages to resources and services among 12,663 unique community members. Agency leads, partnership members, and community members converged on three main themes describing the initiative's impact: (1) Building more empowered and resilient communities; (2) Normalizing help-seeking and reducing the stigma of mental health; and (3) Connections within partnerships/families and with community members. On average, 82% of partnership members endorsed medium to large positive changes in the impacts identified during qualitative analysis. Future work should examine whether contracting with community-based organizations is an effective approach for health systems to promote health equity.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles. The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues. The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like. Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.