Community Impact of Capacity-Building to Develop Trauma Resilient Communities

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1007/s10488-024-01429-4
Todd P. Gilmer, Kimberly Center, Natalie J. Romero, Lila Burgos, Joelle Greene, Elizabeth Siantz, Lawrence A. Palinkas, Amy E. Lansing
{"title":"Community Impact of Capacity-Building to Develop Trauma Resilient Communities","authors":"Todd P. Gilmer,&nbsp;Kimberly Center,&nbsp;Natalie J. Romero,&nbsp;Lila Burgos,&nbsp;Joelle Greene,&nbsp;Elizabeth Siantz,&nbsp;Lawrence A. Palinkas,&nbsp;Amy E. Lansing","doi":"10.1007/s10488-024-01429-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper explores the impact of an initiative designed to promote trauma resilient communities by mitigating social determinants of health and reducing health disparities through capacity-building partnerships. Nine regional partnerships in Los Angeles County were funded to build community capacity to adapt to and recover from traumatic events through outreach and engagement with community members, training related to the impact of trauma, linkages of community members to existing services, and developing new services for target populations. Primary quantitative and qualitative data on community impact were gathered from agency leads (N = 10), partnership members (N = 136), and community members (N = 42). A convergent sequential mixed methods design (qual → QUAN → qual) was selected to provide both breadth and depth of understanding about the impact of community capacity-building from multiple perspectives. From January 2018 through July 2023, partnerships conducted over 30,000 community capacity-building activities with over 1.4 M community members and created 101,370 successful linkages to resources and services among 12,663 unique community members. Agency leads, partnership members, and community members converged on three main themes describing the initiative’s impact: (1) Building more empowered and resilient communities; (2) Normalizing help-seeking and reducing the stigma of mental health; and (3) Connections within partnerships/families and with community members. On average, 82% of partnership members endorsed medium to large positive changes in the impacts identified during qualitative analysis. Future work should examine whether contracting with community-based organizations is an effective approach for health systems to promote health equity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":"52 3","pages":"506 - 519"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133968/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10488-024-01429-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the impact of an initiative designed to promote trauma resilient communities by mitigating social determinants of health and reducing health disparities through capacity-building partnerships. Nine regional partnerships in Los Angeles County were funded to build community capacity to adapt to and recover from traumatic events through outreach and engagement with community members, training related to the impact of trauma, linkages of community members to existing services, and developing new services for target populations. Primary quantitative and qualitative data on community impact were gathered from agency leads (N = 10), partnership members (N = 136), and community members (N = 42). A convergent sequential mixed methods design (qual → QUAN → qual) was selected to provide both breadth and depth of understanding about the impact of community capacity-building from multiple perspectives. From January 2018 through July 2023, partnerships conducted over 30,000 community capacity-building activities with over 1.4 M community members and created 101,370 successful linkages to resources and services among 12,663 unique community members. Agency leads, partnership members, and community members converged on three main themes describing the initiative’s impact: (1) Building more empowered and resilient communities; (2) Normalizing help-seeking and reducing the stigma of mental health; and (3) Connections within partnerships/families and with community members. On average, 82% of partnership members endorsed medium to large positive changes in the impacts identified during qualitative analysis. Future work should examine whether contracting with community-based organizations is an effective approach for health systems to promote health equity.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
能力建设对发展创伤复原社区的社区影响。
本文探讨了一项旨在通过能力建设伙伴关系减轻健康的社会决定因素和缩小健康差距来促进创伤复原社区的倡议的影响。为洛杉矶县的9个区域伙伴关系提供资金,通过与社区成员的接触和接触、与创伤影响有关的培训、社区成员与现有服务的联系以及为目标人群开发新的服务,建立社区适应和从创伤事件中恢复的能力。从机构领导(N = 10)、伙伴关系成员(N = 136)和社区成员(N = 42)中收集了关于社区影响的主要定量和定性数据。采用趋同顺序混合方法设计(质量→全权→质量),从多个角度对社区能力建设的影响提供广度和深度的理解。从2018年1月到2023年7月,合作伙伴关系为140多万社区成员开展了3万多次社区能力建设活动,为12663名社区成员成功建立了101370个与资源和服务的联系。机构领导、伙伴关系成员和社区成员聚集在描述该倡议影响的三个主要主题上:(1)建立更有权能和复原力的社区;(2)使求助正常化,减少心理健康污名化;(3)伙伴关系/家庭内部以及与社区成员的联系。平均而言,82%的伙伴关系成员赞同定性分析中确定的影响中到大的积极变化。今后的工作应审查与社区组织订立合同是否是卫生系统促进卫生公平的有效办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles.  The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues.  The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like.  Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of real-world scale-up processes for school-based mental health interventions. Integrating Primary Care and Mental-Health Care: A Commentary on the Collaborative Care Model and the Psychiatry Consultation Clinic Model. Evaluating Evidence-Based Psychotherapy Utilization Patterns Among Suicide-Risk-Stratified Veterans Diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder. Sustainment of Four Evidence-Based Treatments for Patients with Psychosis: A Prospective Cohort Study in Norway. Sex Difference in Risk and Protective Factors of State Psychiatric Hospital Readmissions among Non-forensic Psychiatric Patients in the United States in 2020-2023: Discrete-Time Hazard Models Applied To the National Mental Health Client-Level Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1