Comparative outcomes of corticosteroids, neuromuscular blocking agents, and inhaled nitric oxide in ARDS: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
{"title":"Comparative outcomes of corticosteroids, neuromuscular blocking agents, and inhaled nitric oxide in ARDS: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Zhiyuan Xu, Xiao Liu, Liang Zhang, Xianliang Yan","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1507805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. However, the evidence regarding the effectiveness of commonly used treatments, including corticosteroids, neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), and inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), remains uncertain. Therefore, this study aimed to compare and rank these three treatments to identify the most effective option.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for clinical trials from the earliest records to 1 May 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection and data extraction: </strong>Clinical trials evaluating three interventions compared with the control group for ARDS were included, with restrictions on any language. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to identify the most effective intervention, and treatments were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality, while secondary outcomes included ventilator-free days up to 28 days, ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality, and the incidence of new infection events.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Data from 26 clinical trials encompassing 5,071 patients were analyzed. Vecuronium bromide was the most effective strategy for reducing 28-day mortality compared to conventional treatment, iNO, methylprednisolone, and placebo (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.15-1.00, and OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10-0.85 and OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.74 and OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.65; SUCRA: 96.6%). Dexamethasone was identified as the most effective treatment option for increasing ventilator-free days at 28 days compared to conventional therapy and cisatracurium (MD 3.60, 95% CI 1.77-5.43, and MD 3.40, 95% CI 0.87-5.92; SUCRA: 93.2%). Methylprednisolone demonstrated the highest effectiveness for preventing ICU mortality (SUCRA: 88.5%). Although dexamethasone, cisatracurium, conventional therapy, methylprednisolone, and iNO treatment did not show significant superiority in reducing in-hospital mortality, dexamethasone showed the highest probability of being the most effective treatment option (SUCRA: 79.7%). Furthermore, dexamethasone treatment showed the highest safety in reducing the incidence of new infection events compared with placebo and iNO (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.88, and OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.19-0.58; SUCRA: 91.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This NMA suggests that corticosteroids may provide benefits to patients with ARDS. While the application of NMBAs may reduce 28-day mortality, iNO did not demonstrate a significant beneficial effect as a therapeutic measure.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO, CRD42022333165 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1507805"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831700/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1507805","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. However, the evidence regarding the effectiveness of commonly used treatments, including corticosteroids, neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), and inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), remains uncertain. Therefore, this study aimed to compare and rank these three treatments to identify the most effective option.
Data sources: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for clinical trials from the earliest records to 1 May 2024.
Study selection and data extraction: Clinical trials evaluating three interventions compared with the control group for ARDS were included, with restrictions on any language. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to identify the most effective intervention, and treatments were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality, while secondary outcomes included ventilator-free days up to 28 days, ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality, and the incidence of new infection events.
Data synthesis: Data from 26 clinical trials encompassing 5,071 patients were analyzed. Vecuronium bromide was the most effective strategy for reducing 28-day mortality compared to conventional treatment, iNO, methylprednisolone, and placebo (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.15-1.00, and OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10-0.85 and OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.74 and OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.65; SUCRA: 96.6%). Dexamethasone was identified as the most effective treatment option for increasing ventilator-free days at 28 days compared to conventional therapy and cisatracurium (MD 3.60, 95% CI 1.77-5.43, and MD 3.40, 95% CI 0.87-5.92; SUCRA: 93.2%). Methylprednisolone demonstrated the highest effectiveness for preventing ICU mortality (SUCRA: 88.5%). Although dexamethasone, cisatracurium, conventional therapy, methylprednisolone, and iNO treatment did not show significant superiority in reducing in-hospital mortality, dexamethasone showed the highest probability of being the most effective treatment option (SUCRA: 79.7%). Furthermore, dexamethasone treatment showed the highest safety in reducing the incidence of new infection events compared with placebo and iNO (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.88, and OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.19-0.58; SUCRA: 91.8%).
Conclusion: This NMA suggests that corticosteroids may provide benefits to patients with ARDS. While the application of NMBAs may reduce 28-day mortality, iNO did not demonstrate a significant beneficial effect as a therapeutic measure.
目的:急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)具有较高的发病率和死亡率。然而,关于常用治疗方法的有效性的证据,包括皮质类固醇、神经肌肉阻滞剂(nmba)和吸入一氧化氮(iNO),仍然不确定。因此,本研究旨在对这三种治疗方法进行比较和排序,以确定最有效的选择。数据来源:我们检索PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library和Web of Science从最早的记录到2024年5月1日的临床试验。研究选择和数据提取:纳入与对照组相比评估三种干预措施的ARDS临床试验,并对任何语言进行限制。数据由两名独立审稿人提取。使用频率网络元分析(NMA)来确定最有效的干预措施,并使用累积排名(SUCRA)曲线下的表面对治疗进行排名。主要转归是28天死亡率,次要转归包括无呼吸机天数至28 天、ICU死亡率、住院死亡率和新感染事件发生率。数据综合:分析了26项临床试验的数据,包括5071例患者。与常规治疗、iNO、甲基强龙和安慰剂相比,维库溴铵是降低28天死亡率最有效的策略(OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.15-1.00和OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10-0.85和OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.74和OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.65;SUCRA: 96.6%)。与常规治疗和顺阿曲库铵相比,地塞米松被确定为增加28 天无呼吸机天数的最有效治疗选择(MD 3.60, 95% CI 1.77-5.43, MD 3.40, 95% CI 0.87-5.92;SUCRA: 93.2%)。甲基强的松龙在预防ICU死亡率方面表现出最高的有效性(supra: 88.5%)。虽然地塞米松、顺阿曲库铵、常规治疗、甲基强的松龙和iNO治疗在降低住院死亡率方面没有显着优势,但地塞米松显示出最有效的治疗选择的最高概率(supra: 79.7%)。此外,与安慰剂和iNO相比,地塞米松治疗在降低新感染事件发生率方面显示出最高的安全性(OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.88, OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.19-0.58;SUCRA: 91.8%)。结论:该NMA提示皮质类固醇可能对ARDS患者有益。虽然nmba的应用可以降低28天死亡率,但作为一种治疗措施,iNO并没有显示出显著的有益效果。系统评价注册:PROSPERO, CRD42022333165 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/。
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate
- the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions
- the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines
- the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities
- access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide
- addressing the grand health challenges around the world