Assessing the Risk for Falls in Older Adults After Initiating Gabapentin Versus Duloxetine.

IF 19.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-07 DOI:10.7326/ANNALS-24-00636
Alexander Chaitoff, Rishi J Desai, Niteesh K Choudhry, Katharina T Jungo, Nancy Haff, Julie C Lauffenburger
{"title":"Assessing the Risk for Falls in Older Adults After Initiating Gabapentin Versus Duloxetine.","authors":"Alexander Chaitoff, Rishi J Desai, Niteesh K Choudhry, Katharina T Jungo, Nancy Haff, Julie C Lauffenburger","doi":"10.7326/ANNALS-24-00636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The evidence informing the harms of gabapentin use are at risk of bias from comparing users with nonusers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the risk for fall-related outcomes in older adults starting treatment with gabapentin versus duloxetine.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>New user, active comparator study using a target trial emulation framework.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>MarketScan (IBM) commercial claims between January 2014 and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults aged 65 years or older with diabetic neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, or fibromyalgia and without depression, anxiety, seizures, or cancer in the 365 days before cohort entry.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>New initiation of treatment with gabapentin or duloxetine (comparator).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary outcome was the hazard of experiencing any fall-related visit in the 6 months after initiating gabapentin or duloxetine until discontinuation of treatment. Secondary outcomes were hazard of severe fall-related events defined as a fall associated with hip fracture or emergency department visit or hospitalization associated with a fall. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for baseline characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analytic cohort included 57 086 older adults with a diagnosis of interest initiating treatment with gabapentin (<i>n</i> = 52 152) or duloxetine (<i>n</i> = 4934). Overall median follow-up duration was 30 days (IQR, 30 to 90 days). Weighted cumulative incidence of a fall-related visit per 1000 person-years at 30, 90, and 180 days was 103.60, 90.44, and 84.44 for gabapentin users and 203.43, 177.73, and 158.21 for duloxetine users, respectively. At 6-month follow-up, incident gabapentin users had lower hazard of falls (hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.64]), but there was no difference in the hazards of experiencing severe falls. Results were similar across sensitivity and subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>Claims may contain fewer frail adults and undercount falls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with incident use of duloxetine, incident use of gabapentin was not associated with increased fall-related visits.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":"178 2","pages":"187-198"},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-00636","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The evidence informing the harms of gabapentin use are at risk of bias from comparing users with nonusers.

Objective: To describe the risk for fall-related outcomes in older adults starting treatment with gabapentin versus duloxetine.

Design: New user, active comparator study using a target trial emulation framework.

Setting: MarketScan (IBM) commercial claims between January 2014 and December 2021.

Participants: Adults aged 65 years or older with diabetic neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, or fibromyalgia and without depression, anxiety, seizures, or cancer in the 365 days before cohort entry.

Intervention: New initiation of treatment with gabapentin or duloxetine (comparator).

Measurements: The primary outcome was the hazard of experiencing any fall-related visit in the 6 months after initiating gabapentin or duloxetine until discontinuation of treatment. Secondary outcomes were hazard of severe fall-related events defined as a fall associated with hip fracture or emergency department visit or hospitalization associated with a fall. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for baseline characteristics.

Results: Our analytic cohort included 57 086 older adults with a diagnosis of interest initiating treatment with gabapentin (n = 52 152) or duloxetine (n = 4934). Overall median follow-up duration was 30 days (IQR, 30 to 90 days). Weighted cumulative incidence of a fall-related visit per 1000 person-years at 30, 90, and 180 days was 103.60, 90.44, and 84.44 for gabapentin users and 203.43, 177.73, and 158.21 for duloxetine users, respectively. At 6-month follow-up, incident gabapentin users had lower hazard of falls (hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.64]), but there was no difference in the hazards of experiencing severe falls. Results were similar across sensitivity and subgroup analyses.

Limitation: Claims may contain fewer frail adults and undercount falls.

Conclusion: Compared with incident use of duloxetine, incident use of gabapentin was not associated with increased fall-related visits.

Primary funding source: None.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
1136
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Annals Graphic Medicine - Firsthand Experiences and Reflections of the Wards. Comparing the Health of Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries: Risk Scores Versus Reality. Development of Prompt Templates for Large Language Model-Driven Screening in Systematic Reviews. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Risk for Depression in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes : A Target Trial Emulation Study. Large Language Models for Screening Search Results in Systematic Reviews: Are We There Yet?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1