The role of community health workers in a collaborative care management intervention for cancer pain management: a feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial.

4区 医学 Q2 Nursing Annals of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.21037/apm-24-125
Abby M Lohr, Joan M Griffin, Jhenitza P Raygoza, Marcus R Frick, Sarah A Minteer, Jon C Tilburt, Andrea L Cheville, Jessica D Austin
{"title":"The role of community health workers in a collaborative care management intervention for cancer pain management: a feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Abby M Lohr, Joan M Griffin, Jhenitza P Raygoza, Marcus R Frick, Sarah A Minteer, Jon C Tilburt, Andrea L Cheville, Jessica D Austin","doi":"10.21037/apm-24-125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the plausible role for community health workers (CHWs) in supporting historically disenfranchised patients experiencing cancer-related pain, few survivorship care models currently include CHWs. The purpose of our study was to learn from existing CHWs regarding the feasibility of working with rural dwelling and/or Hispanic/Latino patients and their cancer care teams; as well as assessing their anticipated barriers and facilitators of delivering a proposed collaborative care pain intervention [Achieving Equity through SocioCulturally-informed, Digitally-Enabled Cancer Pain managemeNT (ASCENT)].</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Guided by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) Research Framework, we recruited experienced CHWs to a mixed-methods feasibility study, including survey, interview and/or focus group. The survey assessed CHWs' comfort level with proposed intervention-related tasks (e.g., working with patients diagnosed with cancer). Interviews and focus groups explored potential training needs, as well as perceived intervention implementation barriers and facilitators. We summarized results using descriptive statistics and a rapid qualitative analytic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 12 CHWs participated. Data included surveys (n=12), interviews (n=8), and a focus group with 4 participants. Overall, participant-CHWs felt confident they could participate in healthcare teams and remotely engage rural-dwelling and/or Hispanic/Latino patients diagnosed with cancer. Implementation barriers and facilitators included: working remotely in an unfamiliar geographic area, resource availability, technology, implementation-specific challenges, and patient level factors (e.g., loss of motivation).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participant-CHWs viewed serving on a multidisciplinary healthcare team to support Hispanic/Latino and rural-dwelling cancer patients experiencing pain as feasible but identified training and resourcing needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"13-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12248872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-24-125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the plausible role for community health workers (CHWs) in supporting historically disenfranchised patients experiencing cancer-related pain, few survivorship care models currently include CHWs. The purpose of our study was to learn from existing CHWs regarding the feasibility of working with rural dwelling and/or Hispanic/Latino patients and their cancer care teams; as well as assessing their anticipated barriers and facilitators of delivering a proposed collaborative care pain intervention [Achieving Equity through SocioCulturally-informed, Digitally-Enabled Cancer Pain managemeNT (ASCENT)].

Methods: Guided by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) Research Framework, we recruited experienced CHWs to a mixed-methods feasibility study, including survey, interview and/or focus group. The survey assessed CHWs' comfort level with proposed intervention-related tasks (e.g., working with patients diagnosed with cancer). Interviews and focus groups explored potential training needs, as well as perceived intervention implementation barriers and facilitators. We summarized results using descriptive statistics and a rapid qualitative analytic approach.

Results: In total, 12 CHWs participated. Data included surveys (n=12), interviews (n=8), and a focus group with 4 participants. Overall, participant-CHWs felt confident they could participate in healthcare teams and remotely engage rural-dwelling and/or Hispanic/Latino patients diagnosed with cancer. Implementation barriers and facilitators included: working remotely in an unfamiliar geographic area, resource availability, technology, implementation-specific challenges, and patient level factors (e.g., loss of motivation).

Conclusions: Participant-CHWs viewed serving on a multidisciplinary healthcare team to support Hispanic/Latino and rural-dwelling cancer patients experiencing pain as feasible but identified training and resourcing needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区卫生工作者在协作护理管理干预癌症疼痛管理中的作用:一项随机对照试验的可行性研究
背景:尽管社区卫生工作者(chw)在支持历史上被剥夺权利的经历癌症相关疼痛的患者方面发挥了看似合理的作用,但目前很少有幸存者护理模式包括chw。我们研究的目的是向现有的卫生工作者学习与农村居住和/或西班牙/拉丁裔患者及其癌症护理团队合作的可行性;以及评估他们提供拟议的协作护理疼痛干预的预期障碍和促进因素[通过社会文化信息,数字化支持的癌症疼痛管理(ASCENT)实现公平]。方法:在国家少数民族健康和健康差异研究所(NIMHD)研究框架的指导下,我们招募了有经验的chw进行混合方法可行性研究,包括调查、访谈和/或焦点小组。这项调查评估了保健员对拟议的干预相关任务(例如,与被诊断患有癌症的病人一起工作)的适应程度。访谈和焦点小组探讨了潜在的培训需求,以及感知到的干预实施障碍和促进因素。我们使用描述性统计和快速定性分析方法总结结果。结果:共有12名CHWs参与。数据包括调查(n=12)、访谈(n=8)和4名参与者的焦点小组。总体而言,参与者- chw相信他们可以参与医疗团队并远程接触农村居住和/或西班牙/拉丁裔诊断为癌症的患者。实施障碍和促进因素包括:在不熟悉的地理区域远程工作、资源可用性、技术、具体实施的挑战和患者水平因素(例如,失去动力)。结论:参与者- chw认为在多学科医疗团队中服务以支持经历疼痛的西班牙裔/拉丁裔和农村居住的癌症患者是可行的,但确定了培训和资源需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of palliative medicine
Annals of palliative medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
231
期刊介绍: Annals of Palliative Medicine (Ann Palliat Med; Print ISSN 2224-5820; Online ISSN 2224-5839) is an open access, international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly with both online and printed copies since 2012. The aim of the journal is to provide up-to-date and cutting-edge information and professional support for health care providers in palliative medicine disciplines to improve the quality of life for patients and their families and caregivers.
期刊最新文献
Driving safety in patients with primary brain tumours and brain metastases in Canada: a scoping review. Radiofrequency ablation of the superior cluneal nerves to treat chronic low back pain: a description of a novel technique. Chronic schizophrenia with aggravation of psychiatric symptoms after cancer surgery: A case report and mini literature review. End-of-life predictions in advanced cancer: nurses' perspectives and the possible role of contact-free vital sign monitoring -a prospective exploratory observational study. "Black box" artificial intelligence for mortality prediction: a mixed- methods study of palliative care team, patient, and caregiver perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1