Effect of ginkgo biloba extract on macula and peripapillary perfusion examined using optical coherence tomography angiography.

Kevin Hodgson, Mathew M Palakkamanil, Angela Zhang, Oksana M Dyachok, Corey A Smith, Marcelo T Nicolela, Balwantray C Chauhan, Lesya M Shuba
{"title":"Effect of ginkgo biloba extract on macula and peripapillary perfusion examined using optical coherence tomography angiography.","authors":"Kevin Hodgson, Mathew M Palakkamanil, Angela Zhang, Oksana M Dyachok, Corey A Smith, Marcelo T Nicolela, Balwantray C Chauhan, Lesya M Shuba","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.01.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of ginkgo biloba extract (GBE) on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) macula and peripapillary perfusion parameters among patients with treated early-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Seventeen patients with early-to-moderate (≥10 dB MD) primary open-angle glaucoma were matched to 17 control patients based on age, sex, and glaucoma status. A total sample size of 34 was determined for effect size 0.5, alpha 0.05, power 0.81, and critical t = 2.03. Normality was confirmed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The intervention was 120 mg oral GBE twice daily for 4 months. OCT-A scans (15° × 15°) of the macula and peripapillary retina were acquired, two-dimensional projection slab images of the superficial vascular complex were exported, and image analysis was performed. Student's t test was used to compare perfusion density between groups, and between baseline and follow-up for each group. The main outcomes were perfusion density of the superficial vascular complex of the macula and the peripapillary region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison between baseline and 4 months' supplementation with GBE revealed no significant change in perfusion density in the macular area, 0.32 (0.04) versus 0.30 (0.04); p = 0.17, and was significantly lower in the peripapillary area, 0.44 (0.05) versus 0.42 (0.04); p = 0.02. No differences were observed in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Four-month supplementation with GBE did not result in clinically significant improvement in macula or peripapillary perfusion density in patients with treated early-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma. Larger studies are needed to confirm an absence of neuroprotective effects of GBE.</p>","PeriodicalId":9606,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.01.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of ginkgo biloba extract (GBE) on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) macula and peripapillary perfusion parameters among patients with treated early-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma.

Design: Clinical trial.

Participants: Seventeen patients with early-to-moderate (≥10 dB MD) primary open-angle glaucoma were matched to 17 control patients based on age, sex, and glaucoma status. A total sample size of 34 was determined for effect size 0.5, alpha 0.05, power 0.81, and critical t = 2.03. Normality was confirmed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests.

Methods: The intervention was 120 mg oral GBE twice daily for 4 months. OCT-A scans (15° × 15°) of the macula and peripapillary retina were acquired, two-dimensional projection slab images of the superficial vascular complex were exported, and image analysis was performed. Student's t test was used to compare perfusion density between groups, and between baseline and follow-up for each group. The main outcomes were perfusion density of the superficial vascular complex of the macula and the peripapillary region.

Results: Comparison between baseline and 4 months' supplementation with GBE revealed no significant change in perfusion density in the macular area, 0.32 (0.04) versus 0.30 (0.04); p = 0.17, and was significantly lower in the peripapillary area, 0.44 (0.05) versus 0.42 (0.04); p = 0.02. No differences were observed in the control group.

Conclusion: Four-month supplementation with GBE did not result in clinically significant improvement in macula or peripapillary perfusion density in patients with treated early-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma. Larger studies are needed to confirm an absence of neuroprotective effects of GBE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
223
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society. The Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology (CJO) is the official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society and is committed to timely publication of original, peer-reviewed ophthalmology and vision science articles.
期刊最新文献
Clinicopathological comparison of benign eyelid tumours in tertiary care centers in Lima and Montreal from 2010 to 2019. Effect of ginkgo biloba extract on macula and peripapillary perfusion examined using optical coherence tomography angiography. G-ROP versus WINROP for retinopathy of prematurity screening: a Calgary perspective. Accuracy of keratoconus-specific formulae compared to standard formulae for intraocular lens power calculation in patients with keratoconus. Optic nerve sheath fenestration for young patients with papilledema secondary to cerebral sinovenous thrombosis: a case series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1