The TANGO-DM randomized controlled trial study protocol: treatment outcomes for gestational diabetes diagnosed according to WHO 2013 or WHO 1999 thresholds.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1186/s12884-025-07230-x
Doortje Rademaker, Leon de Wit, Anne van der Wel, Eline van den Akker, Babette Braams-Lisman, Remke Dullemond, Inge Evers, Sander Galjaard, Brenda Hermsen, Marion van Hoorn, Anjoke Huisjes, Joepe Kaandorp, Annemiek Lub, Simone Lunshof, Flip van der Made, Remco Nijman, Judith van Laar, Karlijn Vollebregt, Joost Velzel, Floortje Vlemmix, Michelle Westerhuis, Lia Wijnberger, Maurice Wouters, Joost Zwart, Judith Bosmans, Patrick Bossuyt, Ruben Duijnhoven, Enrico Lopriore, Esteriek de Miranda, Corine Verhoeven, Ben Willem Mol, Arie Franx, J Hans DeVries, Bas van Rijn, Rebecca Painter
{"title":"The TANGO-DM randomized controlled trial study protocol: treatment outcomes for gestational diabetes diagnosed according to WHO 2013 or WHO 1999 thresholds.","authors":"Doortje Rademaker, Leon de Wit, Anne van der Wel, Eline van den Akker, Babette Braams-Lisman, Remke Dullemond, Inge Evers, Sander Galjaard, Brenda Hermsen, Marion van Hoorn, Anjoke Huisjes, Joepe Kaandorp, Annemiek Lub, Simone Lunshof, Flip van der Made, Remco Nijman, Judith van Laar, Karlijn Vollebregt, Joost Velzel, Floortje Vlemmix, Michelle Westerhuis, Lia Wijnberger, Maurice Wouters, Joost Zwart, Judith Bosmans, Patrick Bossuyt, Ruben Duijnhoven, Enrico Lopriore, Esteriek de Miranda, Corine Verhoeven, Ben Willem Mol, Arie Franx, J Hans DeVries, Bas van Rijn, Rebecca Painter","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07230-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), or hyperglycemia first diagnosed in pregnancy, affects 7-10% of all pregnancies worldwide. Perinatal risk rises with increasing glycemia at oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The new (2013) WHO criteria recommend a lower fasting, and a higher post-load threshold for GDM diagnosis in comparison to the old (1999) WHO criteria. To date, however, outcomes of GDM treatment for those affected by the altered diagnostic criteria, has not been well investigated. We hypothesized that intensive GDM treatment according to the new (2013) GDM criteria would result in a reduction in infants with birth weight > 90th centile (large for gestational age, LGA), in comparison to treatment according to the old criteria (1999).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The TANGO-DM trial is an open label, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Participants are pregnant with a gestational age between 16 + 0 and 32 + 0 weeks, who underwent a 1-step venous 2- or 3-point 75-gram oral OGTT, were eligible if they had glucose concentrations discordant between the old (1999) and the new (2013) criteria. After informed consent, women are randomized to either intensive GDM treatment, consisting of dietary advice and glucose monitoring and, if euglycemia is not reached, antihyperglycemic agents, or normal obstetric care without GDM treatment. The primary outcome is large-for-gestational-age infants (birth weight > 90th percentile). Secondary outcome measures include maternal complications, obstetric complications, neonatal complications, obstetric interventions, quality of life, and healthcare and societal costs. Outcomes will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. The study is powered to detect a reduction in LGA from 16% in the untreated to 10% in the treated group, which requires 1032 participants (516 per arm; alpha-error 5% for 80% power).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The TANGO-DM trial will provide high-level evidence to support or refute the use of the new 2013 WHO diagnostic criteria in terms of their ability to lower the number of large for gestational age infants and/or improve maternal and perinatal outcomes and/or costs in women with gestational diabetes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO) (NL63013.018.18). Registered on 22 September 2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07230-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), or hyperglycemia first diagnosed in pregnancy, affects 7-10% of all pregnancies worldwide. Perinatal risk rises with increasing glycemia at oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The new (2013) WHO criteria recommend a lower fasting, and a higher post-load threshold for GDM diagnosis in comparison to the old (1999) WHO criteria. To date, however, outcomes of GDM treatment for those affected by the altered diagnostic criteria, has not been well investigated. We hypothesized that intensive GDM treatment according to the new (2013) GDM criteria would result in a reduction in infants with birth weight > 90th centile (large for gestational age, LGA), in comparison to treatment according to the old criteria (1999).

Methods: The TANGO-DM trial is an open label, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Participants are pregnant with a gestational age between 16 + 0 and 32 + 0 weeks, who underwent a 1-step venous 2- or 3-point 75-gram oral OGTT, were eligible if they had glucose concentrations discordant between the old (1999) and the new (2013) criteria. After informed consent, women are randomized to either intensive GDM treatment, consisting of dietary advice and glucose monitoring and, if euglycemia is not reached, antihyperglycemic agents, or normal obstetric care without GDM treatment. The primary outcome is large-for-gestational-age infants (birth weight > 90th percentile). Secondary outcome measures include maternal complications, obstetric complications, neonatal complications, obstetric interventions, quality of life, and healthcare and societal costs. Outcomes will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. The study is powered to detect a reduction in LGA from 16% in the untreated to 10% in the treated group, which requires 1032 participants (516 per arm; alpha-error 5% for 80% power).

Discussion: The TANGO-DM trial will provide high-level evidence to support or refute the use of the new 2013 WHO diagnostic criteria in terms of their ability to lower the number of large for gestational age infants and/or improve maternal and perinatal outcomes and/or costs in women with gestational diabetes.

Trial registration: Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO) (NL63013.018.18). Registered on 22 September 2018.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TANGO-DM随机对照试验研究方案:根据WHO 2013或WHO 1999阈值诊断的妊娠糖尿病的治疗结果。
妊娠期糖尿病(GDM),或首次诊断为妊娠期高血糖,影响全世界7-10%的妊娠。围产儿风险随口服糖耐量试验(OGTT)血糖升高而升高。与旧的(1999年)世卫组织标准相比,新的(2013年)世卫组织标准建议更低的禁食和更高的负荷后诊断GDM阈值。然而,到目前为止,对那些受改变的诊断标准影响的GDM治疗的结果还没有得到很好的调查。我们假设,根据新的(2013)GDM标准进行强化治疗,与根据旧标准(1999)进行治疗相比,出生体重为90百分位(胎龄大,LGA)的婴儿数量会减少。方法:TANGO-DM试验是一项开放标签、多中心随机对照试验。孕龄在16 + 0 ~ 32 + 0周的孕妇,接受了1步静脉2点或3点75克口服OGTT,如果血糖浓度在旧标准(1999年)和新标准(2013年)之间不一致,则符合条件。在知情同意后,女性被随机分为两组,一组接受强化GDM治疗,包括饮食建议和血糖监测,如果血糖未达到正常水平,则使用降糖药,另一组接受不接受GDM治疗的正常产科护理。主要结局是胎龄大的婴儿(出生体重bbb90百分位)。次要结局指标包括产妇并发症、产科并发症、新生儿并发症、产科干预措施、生活质量以及医疗保健和社会成本。结果将根据意向治疗原则进行分析。该研究检测到LGA从未治疗组的16%降至治疗组的10%,这需要1032名参与者(每组516人;α误差5%,80%的功率)。讨论:TANGO-DM试验将提供高水平证据,以支持或反驳2013年世卫组织新诊断标准的使用,就其降低大胎龄婴儿数量和/或改善妊娠糖尿病妇女的孕产妇和围产期结局和/或费用的能力而言。试验注册:中央人体受试者研究委员会(CCMO) (NL63013.018.18)。于2018年9月22日注册
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of a tool to assess mothers' knowledge, perception, and practice of child growth monitoring. A secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study: association between aspirin regime and early- and late-onset preeclampsia. Successful management of a patient with multiple myeloma during pregnancy: a case report and literature review. Group B Streptococcus colonization, antibiotic resistance, and maternal-neonatal outcomes in late pregnancy: a retrospective study from 2017 to 2024. Trends in prenatal alcohol use from 2001 to 2017 in the Northern Territory, Australia: a joinpoint regression analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1