The association of metabolic disorders and prognosis in cancer patients.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY BMC Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-13707-x
Yi Li, Chenan Liu, Jinyu Shi, Xin Zheng, Yue Chen, Xiaoyue Liu, Zhaoting Bu, Hong Zhao, Changhong Xu, Bing Yin, Shuyao Wang, Hanping Shi
{"title":"The association of metabolic disorders and prognosis in cancer patients.","authors":"Yi Li, Chenan Liu, Jinyu Shi, Xin Zheng, Yue Chen, Xiaoyue Liu, Zhaoting Bu, Hong Zhao, Changhong Xu, Bing Yin, Shuyao Wang, Hanping Shi","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-13707-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Metabolic disorders are common in cancer patients. This study aimed to classify the metabolic disorder status of cancer patients using hematological indicators and to examine the association between disorder types and prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 6307 patients from INSCOC was classified into three clusters via K-means clustering based on hematological indicators. Logistic regression and Cox models assessed each cluster's impact on adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6,307 participants were included in the study, K-means clustering divided the population into three groups, Cluster 1 (Normal Group, NG), Cluster 2 (Mild Disorder Group, MDG) and Cluster 3 (Severe Disorder Group, SDG). Compared to NG, MDG (OR = 2.268; 95% CI: 1.967-2.616) and SDG (OR = 4.317; 95% CI: 2.441-7.634) had significantly higher risks of sarcopenia. MDG (OR = 1.943; 95% CI: 1.717-2.198) was associated with a higher risk of moderate malnutrition, and both MDG (OR = 3.786; 95% CI: 3.282-4.368) and SDG (OR = 14.501; 95% CI: 6.847-30.709) were identified as risk factors for severe malnutrition (p < 0.05). Cox regression analysis indicated that MDG and SDG were independent risk factors for all-cause mortality (MDG: HR = 1.460, 95% CI: 1.341-1.590; SDG: HR = 2.257, 95% CI: 1.622-3.140) and cancer-specific mortality (MDG: HR = 1.192, 95% CI: 1.039-1.367; SDG: HR = 2.068, 95% CI: 1.825-2.343) (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>K-means clustering effectively categorized metabolic disorder subgroups, supporting targeted interventions and demonstrating a significant link between disorder severity and adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"278"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13707-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Metabolic disorders are common in cancer patients. This study aimed to classify the metabolic disorder status of cancer patients using hematological indicators and to examine the association between disorder types and prognosis.

Methods: A cohort of 6307 patients from INSCOC was classified into three clusters via K-means clustering based on hematological indicators. Logistic regression and Cox models assessed each cluster's impact on adverse outcomes.

Results: A total of 6,307 participants were included in the study, K-means clustering divided the population into three groups, Cluster 1 (Normal Group, NG), Cluster 2 (Mild Disorder Group, MDG) and Cluster 3 (Severe Disorder Group, SDG). Compared to NG, MDG (OR = 2.268; 95% CI: 1.967-2.616) and SDG (OR = 4.317; 95% CI: 2.441-7.634) had significantly higher risks of sarcopenia. MDG (OR = 1.943; 95% CI: 1.717-2.198) was associated with a higher risk of moderate malnutrition, and both MDG (OR = 3.786; 95% CI: 3.282-4.368) and SDG (OR = 14.501; 95% CI: 6.847-30.709) were identified as risk factors for severe malnutrition (p < 0.05). Cox regression analysis indicated that MDG and SDG were independent risk factors for all-cause mortality (MDG: HR = 1.460, 95% CI: 1.341-1.590; SDG: HR = 2.257, 95% CI: 1.622-3.140) and cancer-specific mortality (MDG: HR = 1.192, 95% CI: 1.039-1.367; SDG: HR = 2.068, 95% CI: 1.825-2.343) (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: K-means clustering effectively categorized metabolic disorder subgroups, supporting targeted interventions and demonstrating a significant link between disorder severity and adverse outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症患者代谢紊乱与预后的关系。
目的:代谢紊乱在肿瘤患者中很常见。本研究旨在利用血液学指标对癌症患者的代谢紊乱状态进行分类,并探讨紊乱类型与预后的关系。方法:根据血液学指标,采用k均值聚类法将6307例INSCOC患者分为3组。Logistic回归和Cox模型评估了每个群集对不良结局的影响。结果:研究共纳入6307名参与者,K-means聚类将人群分为三组,集群1(正常组,NG),集群2(轻度障碍组,MDG)和集群3(严重障碍组,SDG)。与NG相比,MDG (OR = 2.268;95% CI: 1.967-2.616)和SDG (OR = 4.317;95% CI: 2.441-7.634)有较高的肌少症风险。千年发展目标(or = 1.943;95% CI: 1.717-2.198)与中度营养不良的高风险相关,而千年发展目标(OR = 3.786;95% CI: 3.282-4.368)和SDG (OR = 14.501;95% CI: 6.847-30.709)被确定为严重营养不良的危险因素(p结论:k均值聚类有效地分类了代谢紊乱亚组,支持有针对性的干预措施,并证明紊乱严重程度与不良结局之间存在显著联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prophylaxis in cancer patients. Clinical patterns, treatment outcomes and determinant factors in children with neuroblastoma in a tertiary referral hospital in Ethiopia. High TLG measured by PET/CT is associated with worse PFS in patients with advanced HR+ breast cancer treated by abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy. Sequential thoracic radiotherapy following immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective cohort study on efficacy and safety. Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of metastatic gastric cancer in South Korea: real-world evidence from retrospective electronic medical records data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1