Mortality predictors for ICU end-of-life decisions: delta-SOFA and SAPS 3 - retrospective evaluation.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1136/spcare-2024-005357
Maria Carmen Sala-Trull, Pablo Monedero, Francisco Guillen-Grima, Pilar Leon-Sanz
{"title":"Mortality predictors for ICU end-of-life decisions: delta-SOFA and SAPS 3 - retrospective evaluation.","authors":"Maria Carmen Sala-Trull, Pablo Monedero, Francisco Guillen-Grima, Pilar Leon-Sanz","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2024-005357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>End-of-life decisions in intensive care units (ICUs) are complex, influenced by patient severity, treatment efficacy and resource constraints. This study assessed the predictive value of delta-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores on days 2, 3 and 5, both independently and combined with Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) 3, for in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study analysed ICU patients with stays of≥5 days from 2018 to 2020. Clinical data included SAPS 3 and SOFA scores at admission, 48 hours and on days 3 and 5, alongside mortality outcomes. Logistic regression and discriminant analysis identified mortality predictors and evaluated model performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 200 patients, 26% died in hospital. Non-survivors had significantly higher SAPS 3 scores (mean 51.9±11.9 vs 45.6±11.9 in survivors, p=0.001) and worsening SOFA scores, particularly on days 3 and 5. Combining SAPS 3 with delta-SOFA on day 5 produced an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.63 to 0.79), indicating moderate predictive ability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating the delta-SOFA score on day 5 with SAPS 3 improves in-hospital mortality predictions during prolonged ICU stays. Findings suggest early treatment limitations within 48 hours may be premature, as patient responses evolve and shared decision-making becomes more feasible over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-005357","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: End-of-life decisions in intensive care units (ICUs) are complex, influenced by patient severity, treatment efficacy and resource constraints. This study assessed the predictive value of delta-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores on days 2, 3 and 5, both independently and combined with Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) 3, for in-hospital mortality.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study analysed ICU patients with stays of≥5 days from 2018 to 2020. Clinical data included SAPS 3 and SOFA scores at admission, 48 hours and on days 3 and 5, alongside mortality outcomes. Logistic regression and discriminant analysis identified mortality predictors and evaluated model performance.

Results: Among 200 patients, 26% died in hospital. Non-survivors had significantly higher SAPS 3 scores (mean 51.9±11.9 vs 45.6±11.9 in survivors, p=0.001) and worsening SOFA scores, particularly on days 3 and 5. Combining SAPS 3 with delta-SOFA on day 5 produced an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.63 to 0.79), indicating moderate predictive ability.

Conclusions: Integrating the delta-SOFA score on day 5 with SAPS 3 improves in-hospital mortality predictions during prolonged ICU stays. Findings suggest early treatment limitations within 48 hours may be premature, as patient responses evolve and shared decision-making becomes more feasible over time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
期刊最新文献
Auriculotherapy and pain intensity and functional disability in older adults with chronic low back pain: randomised single-blind clinical trial. Early oral feeding post gastrectomy in gastric cancer: quasi-experimental study. Immunotherapy and palliative medicine: opportunities and challenges. Symptom reduction in advanced cancer from multi-session mindful breathing: randomised controlled study. The clock is ticking: can palliative care survive the dual crises of time and workforce shortages?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1