Effective coverage for reproductive, maternal, neonatal and newborn health: an analysis of geographical and socioeconomic inequalities in 39 low- and middle-income countries.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMJ Global Health Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016549
Tiara Marthias, Kanya Anindya, Nurmala Selly Saputri, Likke Prawidya Putri, Rifat Atun, John Tayu Lee
{"title":"Effective coverage for reproductive, maternal, neonatal and newborn health: an analysis of geographical and socioeconomic inequalities in 39 low- and middle-income countries.","authors":"Tiara Marthias, Kanya Anindya, Nurmala Selly Saputri, Likke Prawidya Putri, Rifat Atun, John Tayu Lee","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inadequate access to quality maternal and child health services leads to poor health outcomes for millions of women, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aims to explore the effective coverage of reproductive, maternal, neonatal and newborn health (RMNCH) services and examines socioeconomic and rural and urban disparities in 39 LMICs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data, the research assesses RMNCH service quality by applying an effective coverage framework, which measures service contact, crude coverage, quality-adjusted coverage and user adherence-adjusted coverage. We applied weighted analyses to investigate the rural-urban differences in service coverage based on countries' Human Development Index (HDI) levels as well as crude coverage and socioeconomic levels.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Urban areas generally exhibit better effective coverage across all RMNCH services compared with rural areas, with significant disparities in antenatal, childbirth and postnatal care. For instance, 85% (95% CI=85-86%) of urban women received skilled birth attendance compared with 64% (95% CI=64-65%) in rural areas. High-HDI countries show smaller rural-urban gaps in service coverage than low-HDI countries. Socioeconomic inequalities are more pronounced in rural areas, particularly in services that require higher quality and adherence to standards. Socioeconomic disparities are significant in LMICs with lower HDI and are more evident in harder-to-achieve quality indicators, such as user adherence to recommended practices or treatment. For example, in medium-HDI countries, the relative inequality index (RII) for antenatal care user adherence coverage is 3.6 (95% CI=3.4-3.8) in rural areas compared with 1.9 (95% CI=1.8-2.1) in urban areas.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The research underscores the need for targeted interventions and policies to address these disparities. The evidence supports the need for a shift from focusing solely on access to care to improve the quality of care to address rural-urban and socioeconomic inequalities in RMNCH outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inadequate access to quality maternal and child health services leads to poor health outcomes for millions of women, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aims to explore the effective coverage of reproductive, maternal, neonatal and newborn health (RMNCH) services and examines socioeconomic and rural and urban disparities in 39 LMICs.

Methods: Using Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data, the research assesses RMNCH service quality by applying an effective coverage framework, which measures service contact, crude coverage, quality-adjusted coverage and user adherence-adjusted coverage. We applied weighted analyses to investigate the rural-urban differences in service coverage based on countries' Human Development Index (HDI) levels as well as crude coverage and socioeconomic levels.

Findings: Urban areas generally exhibit better effective coverage across all RMNCH services compared with rural areas, with significant disparities in antenatal, childbirth and postnatal care. For instance, 85% (95% CI=85-86%) of urban women received skilled birth attendance compared with 64% (95% CI=64-65%) in rural areas. High-HDI countries show smaller rural-urban gaps in service coverage than low-HDI countries. Socioeconomic inequalities are more pronounced in rural areas, particularly in services that require higher quality and adherence to standards. Socioeconomic disparities are significant in LMICs with lower HDI and are more evident in harder-to-achieve quality indicators, such as user adherence to recommended practices or treatment. For example, in medium-HDI countries, the relative inequality index (RII) for antenatal care user adherence coverage is 3.6 (95% CI=3.4-3.8) in rural areas compared with 1.9 (95% CI=1.8-2.1) in urban areas.

Interpretation: The research underscores the need for targeted interventions and policies to address these disparities. The evidence supports the need for a shift from focusing solely on access to care to improve the quality of care to address rural-urban and socioeconomic inequalities in RMNCH outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和新生儿健康的有效覆盖:对39个低收入和中等收入国家的地理和社会经济不平等现象的分析。
背景:获得优质妇幼保健服务的机会不足导致数百万妇女健康状况不佳,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。本研究旨在探讨生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和新生儿健康(RMNCH)服务的有效覆盖范围,并检查39个中低收入国家的社会经济和城乡差异。方法:利用人口与健康调查(DHS)数据,采用有效覆盖框架评估RMNCH服务质量,该框架包括服务接触、粗覆盖率、质量调整覆盖率和用户依从性调整覆盖率。基于各国人类发展指数(HDI)水平以及粗覆盖率和社会经济水平,我们应用加权分析方法调查了城乡服务覆盖率的差异。研究结果:与农村地区相比,城市地区在所有RMNCH服务中普遍表现出更好的有效覆盖,在产前、分娩和产后护理方面存在显著差异。例如,85% (95% CI=85-86%)的城市妇女获得熟练助产服务,而农村地区的这一比例为64% (95% CI=64-65%)。与低人类发展指数国家相比,高人类发展指数国家在服务覆盖方面的城乡差距较小。社会经济不平等在农村地区更为明显,特别是在需要更高质量和遵守标准的服务方面。社会经济差异在人类发展指数较低的中低收入国家中非常显著,在难以实现的质量指标(如用户对推荐做法或治疗的依从性)中更为明显。例如,在中等人类发展指数国家,农村地区产前保健使用者依从性覆盖率的相对不平等指数(RII)为3.6 (95% CI=3.4-3.8),而城市地区为1.9 (95% CI=1.8-2.1)。解释:该研究强调需要有针对性的干预措施和政策来解决这些差异。证据表明,有必要从仅仅关注获得医疗服务转向改善医疗质量,以解决农村和城市以及RMNCH结果中的社会经济不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
期刊最新文献
Bringing severe non-communicable disease care to district-level hospitals in Nepal: PEN-Plus experience and regional policy implications. Opportunities and challenges in integrating family planning and nutrition services in Tanzania: a mixed-methods study. Leveraging connections between family planning and nutrition to improve the health of women. Beyond parallel programmes: a roadmap for operational integration of family planning and nutrition in low- and middle-income countries. Opportunities and challenges for integrating family planning and nutrition policies and programmes in Burkina Faso: a mixed-methods study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1