Usability Assessment of Salud Electronic Dental Record System.

IF 1.8 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-02-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CCIDE.S481003
Abdulwahhab Alshammari, Mohammed Awawdeh, Nawaf Hamoud Alsalwah, Sana Alnafrani, Suliman Alsaeed
{"title":"Usability Assessment of Salud Electronic Dental Record System.","authors":"Abdulwahhab Alshammari, Mohammed Awawdeh, Nawaf Hamoud Alsalwah, Sana Alnafrani, Suliman Alsaeed","doi":"10.2147/CCIDE.S481003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As the demand for comprehensive patient records grows, dental practices increasingly adopt Electronic Dental Records (EDRs). This study evaluates the usability of the Salud EDR application implemented at the College of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, focusing on potential users without prior experience using the application to identify usability challenges and areas for improvement. Theoretical frameworks such as the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) were employed to contextualize the findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study design was employed, integrating both qualitative and quantitative methods. Think-Aloud sessions captured participants' cognitive processes during task completion, while semi-structured Exit Interviews provided insights into their overall experience and feedback. The System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire measured satisfaction, and navigation pathways were analyzed to compare task performance between potential users and an experienced user.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Potential users required significantly more clicks to complete tasks than experienced users, indicating navigation challenges. The SUS questionnaire yielded a mean score of 31.1, categorized as \"not acceptable\", reflecting low Perceived Usefulness and Ease of Use as outlined by TAM. DOI attributes such as high Complexity and low Compatibility were also evident in user feedback. Exit Interviews revealed that participants found the interface complex, with design issues such as unclear icons and terminology further complicating navigation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings underscore the need for interface design improvements, including clearer icons, terminology, and navigation pathways, to enhance usability and satisfaction. The application of TAM and DOI frameworks provided a structured lens to interpret usability challenges and inform targeted recommendations. This study demonstrates the importance of usability testing in identifying and addressing challenges in EDR systems, contributing to better user experiences and more effective adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":10445,"journal":{"name":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry","volume":"17 ","pages":"111-120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830931/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S481003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: As the demand for comprehensive patient records grows, dental practices increasingly adopt Electronic Dental Records (EDRs). This study evaluates the usability of the Salud EDR application implemented at the College of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, focusing on potential users without prior experience using the application to identify usability challenges and areas for improvement. Theoretical frameworks such as the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) were employed to contextualize the findings.

Methods: A cross-sectional study design was employed, integrating both qualitative and quantitative methods. Think-Aloud sessions captured participants' cognitive processes during task completion, while semi-structured Exit Interviews provided insights into their overall experience and feedback. The System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire measured satisfaction, and navigation pathways were analyzed to compare task performance between potential users and an experienced user.

Results: Potential users required significantly more clicks to complete tasks than experienced users, indicating navigation challenges. The SUS questionnaire yielded a mean score of 31.1, categorized as "not acceptable", reflecting low Perceived Usefulness and Ease of Use as outlined by TAM. DOI attributes such as high Complexity and low Compatibility were also evident in user feedback. Exit Interviews revealed that participants found the interface complex, with design issues such as unclear icons and terminology further complicating navigation.

Discussion: The findings underscore the need for interface design improvements, including clearer icons, terminology, and navigation pathways, to enhance usability and satisfaction. The application of TAM and DOI frameworks provided a structured lens to interpret usability challenges and inform targeted recommendations. This study demonstrates the importance of usability testing in identifying and addressing challenges in EDR systems, contributing to better user experiences and more effective adoption.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Salud电子牙科病历系统的可用性评估。
简介:随着对综合病历需求的增长,牙科诊所越来越多地采用电子牙科病历(EDRs)。本研究评估了沙特阿拉伯利雅得国王沙特本阿卜杜勒阿齐兹健康科学大学牙科学院实施的Salud EDR应用程序的可用性,重点关注没有使用该应用程序经验的潜在用户,以确定可用性挑战和需要改进的领域。采用技术接受模型(TAM)和创新扩散(DOI)等理论框架对研究结果进行背景分析。方法:采用横断面研究设计,定性与定量相结合。有声思考环节捕捉了参与者在完成任务时的认知过程,而半结构化的离职访谈则提供了对他们整体体验和反馈的洞察。系统可用性量表(SUS)问卷测量满意度,并分析导航路径以比较潜在用户和经验用户之间的任务绩效。结果:潜在用户比有经验的用户需要更多的点击来完成任务,这表明了导航的挑战。SUS问卷的平均得分为31.1,被归类为“不可接受”,反映了TAM概述的低感知有用性和易用性。高复杂性和低兼容性等DOI属性在用户反馈中也很明显。退出访谈显示,参与者发现界面很复杂,不清晰的图标和术语等设计问题进一步复杂化了导航。讨论:研究结果强调了界面设计改进的必要性,包括更清晰的图标、术语和导航路径,以提高可用性和满意度。TAM和DOI框架的应用提供了一个结构化的视角来解释可用性挑战并提供有针对性的建议。这项研究证明了可用性测试在识别和解决EDR系统挑战方面的重要性,有助于更好的用户体验和更有效的采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
43
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Accuracy, Reproducibility, and Reliability of Orthodontic Measurements Obtained from Conventional Plaster Models versus Digital Orthodontic Models. Barriers to the Utilization of Government Dental Health Services Among Low-Income Families in Ugwuaji, Enugu South LGA of Enugu State, Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Over-the-Counter Teeth Whitening Products Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Survey. A Narrative Review of the Material Properties, Clinical Efficacy, and Developmental Prospects of Bulk-Fill Resin-Based Composites. The Effect of Thermal Cycling and Cyclic Loading on The Flexural Strength of Milled PMMA Versus 3D Printed PEEK as a Provisional Restorative Restoration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1