Screening for cervical and breast cancer among community health care workers (ASHAs) of Puri district, Odisha.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Indian journal of cancer Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.4103/ijc.ijc_725_21
Satabdi Rath, Anu Mary Oommen, Anne George Cherian
{"title":"Screening for cervical and breast cancer among community health care workers (ASHAs) of Puri district, Odisha.","authors":"Satabdi Rath, Anu Mary Oommen, Anne George Cherian","doi":"10.4103/ijc.ijc_725_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer and cervical cancer are the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in Indian women. As part of the Indian national guidelines for population-based cancer screening, village-level accredited social health activists (ASHAs) are the key mobilizers for encouraging women to undergo cervical and breast cancer screening. Assessing screening rates in these health workers themselves, can improve implementation of the national program by identifying some of the facilitators and barriers for screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among ASHAs in Puri, Odisha, in eight primary health centers (PHCs) randomly selected from 10 blocks. Of all 291 ASHAs in these PHCs, 242 (83.2%) who consented, were given a self-administered questionnaire to assess screening and its associated factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The screening rates for cervical and breast screening in ASHA workers were 9.1% (95% CI: 5.4%-12.8%, 22/242) and 14.9% (95% CI: 10.3%-19.5%, 36/242), respectively. Having undergone screening themselves, was associated with referring others for screening (83.3% of those screened for breast cancer had referred others vs 37.4% of those never screened; 86.4% of those screened for cervical cancer had referred others vs 34.1% of those never screened).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ASHAs reported low rates of screening for breast and cervical cancer. History of screening significantly influenced the referral of others for screening. ASHAs need to be empowered with both educational exposure as well as motivation for health-promoting activities for themselves, in order to increase population-wide screening coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":13505,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of cancer","volume":"61 4","pages":"805-811"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijc.ijc_725_21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer and cervical cancer are the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in Indian women. As part of the Indian national guidelines for population-based cancer screening, village-level accredited social health activists (ASHAs) are the key mobilizers for encouraging women to undergo cervical and breast cancer screening. Assessing screening rates in these health workers themselves, can improve implementation of the national program by identifying some of the facilitators and barriers for screening.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among ASHAs in Puri, Odisha, in eight primary health centers (PHCs) randomly selected from 10 blocks. Of all 291 ASHAs in these PHCs, 242 (83.2%) who consented, were given a self-administered questionnaire to assess screening and its associated factors.

Results: The screening rates for cervical and breast screening in ASHA workers were 9.1% (95% CI: 5.4%-12.8%, 22/242) and 14.9% (95% CI: 10.3%-19.5%, 36/242), respectively. Having undergone screening themselves, was associated with referring others for screening (83.3% of those screened for breast cancer had referred others vs 37.4% of those never screened; 86.4% of those screened for cervical cancer had referred others vs 34.1% of those never screened).

Conclusions: ASHAs reported low rates of screening for breast and cervical cancer. History of screening significantly influenced the referral of others for screening. ASHAs need to be empowered with both educational exposure as well as motivation for health-promoting activities for themselves, in order to increase population-wide screening coverage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Bad luck, no luck, good luck!
IF 1.6 4区 医学Journal of Cancer EducationPub Date : 2015-06-01 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-015-0817-0
Arthur M Michalek
Luck for Moral Luck?
IF 0.5 4区 哲学PHILOSOPHIAPub Date : 2020-05-29 DOI: 10.1007/s11406-020-00221-6
Samuel Laves
Resultant Luck*: RESULTANT LUCK
IF 1.5 1区 哲学PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCHPub Date : 2012-01-01 DOI: 10.1111/J.1933-1592.2010.00446.X
Carolina Sartorio
来源期刊
Indian journal of cancer
Indian journal of cancer Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Cancer (ISSN 0019-509X), the show window of the progress of ontological sciences in India, was established in 1963. Indian Journal of Cancer is the first and only periodical serving the needs of all the specialties of oncology in India.
期刊最新文献
Prognostic Value of Systemic Inflammatory Markers in Elderly Patients with Tumor-associated Venous Thromboembolism. Second primary cancers: Incidence and outcomes from a population of patients accrued in six prospective controlled trials at a tertiary cancer institute. Recurrence patterns-analysis from a South Indian breast cancer patient cohort. The impact of nutritional status on treatment-related toxicities in children with embryonal brain tumors: The need for proactive nutritional management. Evaluation of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity using cardiac biomarkers: A prospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1