High-Resolution Manometry With Solid Provocative Test in Patients With Mid-Thoracic and Epiphrenic Esophageal Diverticula.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurogastroenterology and Motility Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1111/nmo.70002
Loris Baravian, Chloé Melchior, Sofia Hambli, Julien Branche, Romain Gérard, Fabien Wuestenberghs, Guillaume Piessen, Guillaume Gourcerol, Pauline Wils
{"title":"High-Resolution Manometry With Solid Provocative Test in Patients With Mid-Thoracic and Epiphrenic Esophageal Diverticula.","authors":"Loris Baravian, Chloé Melchior, Sofia Hambli, Julien Branche, Romain Gérard, Fabien Wuestenberghs, Guillaume Piessen, Guillaume Gourcerol, Pauline Wils","doi":"10.1111/nmo.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of studies exploring esophageal motility disorders using high-resolution manometry (HRM) in patients with esophageal diverticula (ED) is limited. The goal of this study was to describe motility disorders using HRM in patients with ED and assess the added value of provocative testing in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with ED who underwent HRM between 2010 and 2022 were retrospectively included. HRM findings were compared based on single water swallows (SWS), and provocative testing with solid food swallows in the upright seated position, using both ManoView and Medical Measurement Systems software. We also calculated median pressure slopes during the compartmentalization phase.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Sixteen of the 39 included patients had mid-ED and 23 had lower ED. Twenty (51.3%) patients had motility disorders based on SWS, including 7 (18%) with achalasia and 3 (7.7%) with esophagogastric junction obstruction. No significant differences in esophageal motility disorders were observed in relation to the location of the ED. Solid food swallows were performed in 29 (74%) patients leading to a change in the HRM diagnosis in 7 (24.1%), all of whom showed elevated IRP. Median pressure slopes during the compartmentalization phase (n = 30) were elevated in patients both with and without motility disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and inferences: </strong>Half of the patients with mid- or lower ED had motility disorders on HRM. Adding solid food swallows during HRM in patients with ED improves the manometric diagnosis. Results suggest abnormal distensibility in these patients, indicated by elevated pressure slope, regardless of the presence of associated motility disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e70002"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The number of studies exploring esophageal motility disorders using high-resolution manometry (HRM) in patients with esophageal diverticula (ED) is limited. The goal of this study was to describe motility disorders using HRM in patients with ED and assess the added value of provocative testing in these patients.

Methods: Patients with ED who underwent HRM between 2010 and 2022 were retrospectively included. HRM findings were compared based on single water swallows (SWS), and provocative testing with solid food swallows in the upright seated position, using both ManoView and Medical Measurement Systems software. We also calculated median pressure slopes during the compartmentalization phase.

Key results: Sixteen of the 39 included patients had mid-ED and 23 had lower ED. Twenty (51.3%) patients had motility disorders based on SWS, including 7 (18%) with achalasia and 3 (7.7%) with esophagogastric junction obstruction. No significant differences in esophageal motility disorders were observed in relation to the location of the ED. Solid food swallows were performed in 29 (74%) patients leading to a change in the HRM diagnosis in 7 (24.1%), all of whom showed elevated IRP. Median pressure slopes during the compartmentalization phase (n = 30) were elevated in patients both with and without motility disorders.

Conclusion and inferences: Half of the patients with mid- or lower ED had motility disorders on HRM. Adding solid food swallows during HRM in patients with ED improves the manometric diagnosis. Results suggest abnormal distensibility in these patients, indicated by elevated pressure slope, regardless of the presence of associated motility disorders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
固体激发试验高分辨率测压在中胸和表食管憩室中的应用。
背景:使用高分辨率测压仪(HRM)在食管憩室(ED)患者中探讨食管运动障碍的研究数量有限。本研究的目的是用HRM描述ED患者的运动障碍,并评估激发测试在这些患者中的附加价值。方法:回顾性分析2010年至2022年间接受HRM治疗的ED患者。使用ManoView和Medical Measurement Systems软件,对单只燕子(SWS)的HRM结果和直立坐姿的固体食物燕子的刺激性测试进行了比较。我们还计算了分隔阶段的中位压力斜率。关键结果:39例纳入的患者中,16例为中度ED, 23例为轻度ED。20例(51.3%)患者存在基于SWS的运动障碍,其中7例(18%)为贲门失弛缓症,3例(7.7%)为食管胃交界梗阻。食管运动障碍与ED的位置没有显著差异。29例(74%)患者进行了固体食物吞咽,导致7例(24.1%)患者HRM诊断发生变化,所有患者均显示IRP升高。在区隔化阶段(n = 30),有或没有运动障碍的患者中位压力斜率均升高。结论与推论:半数中低度ED患者在HRM时存在运动障碍。在ED患者HRM中添加固体食物可提高血压诊断。结果显示,这些患者的异常扩张性表现为血压斜率升高,无论是否存在相关的运动障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
期刊最新文献
Acacetin Alleviates Loperamide-Induced Functional Constipation by Inhibiting P53-Mediated Apoptosis in Colonic Epithelial Cells. Natural History of Psychological Symptoms in Individuals With Rome IV Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Association With Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity. Avoidant-Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Is Common in Adults With Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome and Is Associated With Malnutrition. Can Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction be Quantified in Systemic Sclerosis Without Excluding Dysmotility? Clinical Symptoms Do Not Distinguish Sucrose Malabsorption From SIBO.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1