Variation in the Definitions of Urinary Retention in Studies of Intravesical Botulinum Toxin for Idiopathic Overactive Bladder: A Narrative Systematic Review.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Neurourology and Urodynamics Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1002/nau.70017
Stephanie Stavrou, Jessica A Paynter, Thomas Carins, Kirby R Qin, Janelle Brennan
{"title":"Variation in the Definitions of Urinary Retention in Studies of Intravesical Botulinum Toxin for Idiopathic Overactive Bladder: A Narrative Systematic Review.","authors":"Stephanie Stavrou, Jessica A Paynter, Thomas Carins, Kirby R Qin, Janelle Brennan","doi":"10.1002/nau.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To categorise and quantify definitions of urinary retention reported in studies assessing botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections for idiopathic overactive bladder (iOAB) syndrome.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A narrative systematic review was conducted using three databases: EMBASE (via Ovid), PubMed, and SCOPUS. Inclusion criteria comprised studies published as full-text articles in English involving adults receiving BoNT injections (any formulation) for iOAB syndrome, where urinary retention was reported as an outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1986 screened studies, 135 were assessed, and 57 met the eligibility criteria for the narrative systematic review. Reported rates of urinary retention varied widely, ranging from 0% to 42.6%. A definition of urinary retention was provided in 33 studies (57.9%), which were broadly categorised as follows. 1. Post-void residual (PVR) volume threshold: 14 studies (21.5%). 2. Inability to void: 6 studies (9.2%). 3. Initiation of clean intermittent catheterisation (CIC): 6 studies (9.2%). 4. PVR volume threshold and initiation of CIC/indwelling catheterisation (IDC): 6 studies (9.2%). 5. Bladder symptoms and PVR volume threshold and initiation of CIC/IDC: 6 studies (9.2%). 6. Bladder symptoms and PVR volume threshold: 3 studies (4.6%). Notably, 24 studies (42.1%) omitted a definition altogether.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Urinary retention rates varied significantly between studies, likely due to the heterogeneous definitions used. The omission of definitions in nearly half of studies further complicates efforts to accurately inform and consent patients regarding the risk of urinary retention and the need for CIC/IDC after intravesical BoNT injection. Standardised definitions are urgently needed to enhance research, improve clinical practice, and support informed patient counselling.</p>","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.70017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To categorise and quantify definitions of urinary retention reported in studies assessing botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections for idiopathic overactive bladder (iOAB) syndrome.

Materials and methods: A narrative systematic review was conducted using three databases: EMBASE (via Ovid), PubMed, and SCOPUS. Inclusion criteria comprised studies published as full-text articles in English involving adults receiving BoNT injections (any formulation) for iOAB syndrome, where urinary retention was reported as an outcome.

Results: From 1986 screened studies, 135 were assessed, and 57 met the eligibility criteria for the narrative systematic review. Reported rates of urinary retention varied widely, ranging from 0% to 42.6%. A definition of urinary retention was provided in 33 studies (57.9%), which were broadly categorised as follows. 1. Post-void residual (PVR) volume threshold: 14 studies (21.5%). 2. Inability to void: 6 studies (9.2%). 3. Initiation of clean intermittent catheterisation (CIC): 6 studies (9.2%). 4. PVR volume threshold and initiation of CIC/indwelling catheterisation (IDC): 6 studies (9.2%). 5. Bladder symptoms and PVR volume threshold and initiation of CIC/IDC: 6 studies (9.2%). 6. Bladder symptoms and PVR volume threshold: 3 studies (4.6%). Notably, 24 studies (42.1%) omitted a definition altogether.

Conclusions: Urinary retention rates varied significantly between studies, likely due to the heterogeneous definitions used. The omission of definitions in nearly half of studies further complicates efforts to accurately inform and consent patients regarding the risk of urinary retention and the need for CIC/IDC after intravesical BoNT injection. Standardised definitions are urgently needed to enhance research, improve clinical practice, and support informed patient counselling.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurourology and Urodynamics
Neurourology and Urodynamics 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurourology and Urodynamics welcomes original scientific contributions from all parts of the world on topics related to urinary tract function, urinary and fecal continence and pelvic floor function.
期刊最新文献
Pathophysiology of Urethral Instability: Dysfunction of Smooth Urethral Musculature. Practice Patterns of Surgeons Seeking Board Certification in Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery. Variation in the Definitions of Urinary Retention in Studies of Intravesical Botulinum Toxin for Idiopathic Overactive Bladder: A Narrative Systematic Review. Urinary Diversion as Last Option After Failed Artificial Urinary Sphincter and Iatrogenic Devastated Bladder Outlet. Using a Back-Worn Accelerometer to Capture Nocturia Frequency in Parkinson's: An Exploratory Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1