Testing items to screen for religious or spiritual distress in adult outpatient cancer care.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1007/s00520-025-09260-9
Dirk Labuschagne, Patricia K Palmer, Teresa Deshields, James Gerhart, George Fitchett
{"title":"Testing items to screen for religious or spiritual distress in adult outpatient cancer care.","authors":"Dirk Labuschagne, Patricia K Palmer, Teresa Deshields, James Gerhart, George Fitchett","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09260-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The experience of cancer diagnosis and treatment is associated with significant stress. While religion and spirituality (R/S) can provide crucial support, many patients also experience R/S distress. Screening for distress has gained recognition, with tools evolving to address spiritual needs; however, existing screening measures have limitations. This study aims to validate screening items for R/S distress among cancer patients undergoing treatment, using a standardized chaplain assessment as a reference standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved adult cancer patients undergoing outpatient treatment at Rush Cancer Center. Procedures included researcher-administered screening questions and the ONC-5 spiritual assessment interview with a board-certified chaplain. Data included demographics, illness variables, and R/S measures. Eight single-item and two multi-item screening measures were evaluated against the ONC-5. Analysis entailed descriptive statistics and sensitivity/specificity determination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study participants (N = 71) were predominantly female (53.5%) with common cancers (breast, colon/rectum, and lung). R/S distress was evident in 19.7%. Single-item screeners exhibited sensitivities from 14 to 71% and specificities from 72 to 98%. The King 2-question combination showed 71% sensitivity and 63% specificity. The Rush protocol demonstrated 36% sensitivity and 88% specificity. Post hoc analyses of two-item combinations did not enhance sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study evaluated R/S distress screening items among outpatient cancer patients. The single-item screener asking whether participants' R/S provided all the strength and comfort needed now performed best with a sensitivity and specificity of 71% and 83%, respectively. Despite limitations, our findings underscore the importance of refining R/S distress screening tools in oncology care.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 3","pages":"198"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09260-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The experience of cancer diagnosis and treatment is associated with significant stress. While religion and spirituality (R/S) can provide crucial support, many patients also experience R/S distress. Screening for distress has gained recognition, with tools evolving to address spiritual needs; however, existing screening measures have limitations. This study aims to validate screening items for R/S distress among cancer patients undergoing treatment, using a standardized chaplain assessment as a reference standard.

Methods: The study involved adult cancer patients undergoing outpatient treatment at Rush Cancer Center. Procedures included researcher-administered screening questions and the ONC-5 spiritual assessment interview with a board-certified chaplain. Data included demographics, illness variables, and R/S measures. Eight single-item and two multi-item screening measures were evaluated against the ONC-5. Analysis entailed descriptive statistics and sensitivity/specificity determination.

Results: Study participants (N = 71) were predominantly female (53.5%) with common cancers (breast, colon/rectum, and lung). R/S distress was evident in 19.7%. Single-item screeners exhibited sensitivities from 14 to 71% and specificities from 72 to 98%. The King 2-question combination showed 71% sensitivity and 63% specificity. The Rush protocol demonstrated 36% sensitivity and 88% specificity. Post hoc analyses of two-item combinations did not enhance sensitivity.

Conclusion: This study evaluated R/S distress screening items among outpatient cancer patients. The single-item screener asking whether participants' R/S provided all the strength and comfort needed now performed best with a sensitivity and specificity of 71% and 83%, respectively. Despite limitations, our findings underscore the importance of refining R/S distress screening tools in oncology care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
筛查成人门诊癌症治疗中宗教或精神困扰的测试项目。
目的:癌症诊断和治疗的经历与显著的压力相关。虽然宗教和灵性(R/S)可以提供重要的支持,但许多患者也会经历R/S痛苦。对痛苦的筛查得到了认可,工具不断发展,以满足精神需求;然而,现有的筛查措施存在局限性。本研究旨在以标准化的牧师评估作为参考标准,验证接受治疗的癌症患者R/S困扰的筛查项目。方法:研究对象为在拉什癌症中心接受门诊治疗的成年癌症患者。程序包括研究人员管理的筛选问题和ONC-5精神评估面试与委员会认证的牧师。数据包括人口统计、疾病变量和R/S测量。针对ONC-5评估了8项单项和2项多项筛选措施。分析包括描述性统计和敏感性/特异性测定。结果:研究参与者(N = 71)主要是患有常见癌症(乳腺癌、结肠癌/直肠癌和肺癌)的女性(53.5%)。有19.7%的人出现明显的R/S遇险。单项目筛选器的灵敏度为14% ~ 71%,特异性为72% ~ 98%。King 2个问题组合显示71%的敏感性和63%的特异性。Rush方案的敏感性为36%,特异性为88%。两项组合的事后分析并没有提高敏感性。结论:本研究对门诊癌症患者的R/S窘迫筛查项目进行了评价。询问参与者的R/S是否提供了所需的所有力量和舒适度的单项筛选现在表现最好,灵敏度和特异性分别为71%和83%。尽管存在局限性,但我们的研究结果强调了改进R/S窘迫筛查工具在肿瘤护理中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
High-dose vitamin C supplementation in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A pilot randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Integrating psychosocial support into multidisciplinary lung cancer care: a roadmap for stages I-III NSCLC. Electroacupuncture combined with nutritional intervention for gastrointestinal cancer-related sarcopenia: a randomized controlled trial using ultrasonographic indices. The mediating role of resourcefulness in the relationship between perceived stress and benefit finding among non-small cell lung cancer patients: a cross-sectional study. The impact of social determinants on care for veterans with cancer: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1