Performance of real-time continuous glucose monitoring during track and field training in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Rebecca T Zimmer, Felix Aberer, Janis Schierbauer, Paul Zimmermann, Philipp Birnbaumer, Maria Fritsch, Elke Fröhlich-Reiterer, Peter Hofmann, Harald Sourij, Othmar Moser
{"title":"Performance of real-time continuous glucose monitoring during track and field training in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.","authors":"Rebecca T Zimmer, Felix Aberer, Janis Schierbauer, Paul Zimmermann, Philipp Birnbaumer, Maria Fritsch, Elke Fröhlich-Reiterer, Peter Hofmann, Harald Sourij, Othmar Moser","doi":"10.5114/pedm.2024.146685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) has become an integral component of modern diabetes management. However, sensor performance data of adolescents, especially during exercise, are scarce. Therefore, this investigation aimed to determine the performance of a rtCGM-system before, during, and after exercise around a 4-week track and field training intervention in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Eight adolescents (2 females, 15.5 ±1.0 years, BMI: 21.0 ±2.3 kg/m2) with T1D and an HbA1c of 7.0 ±0.6% (53.0 ±6.6 mmol/mol) participated in a 4-week track and field intervention consisting of three 60-minute exercise sessions per week. Sensor glucose levels (Dexcom G6; Dexcom Inc., San Diego, CA) were obtained at rest and after 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes during, as well as 5 minutes after exercise and compared to a reference capillary blood glucose value (Biosen S-Line, EKF Diagnostics, GER). rtCGM performance was assessed using the median absolute relative difference (MedARD) and interquartile range [IQR] as well as the Bland-Altman method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>443 points of comparison were available for analysis. The overall MedARD (IQR) was 19.1% (12.2-27.3). MedARDs for time in range (70-180 mg/dl), below range ( 180 mg/dl) were 22.0% (17.8-29.2), 28.4% (18.8-36.3), and 15.9% (9.4-20.7), respectively. The in-exercise MedARD was 19.4% (12.3-27.8), and pre- and post-exercise MedARDs were 21.6% (14.5-28.3) and 14.9% (9.0-21.6), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In structured track and field training involving adolescents with T1D, the accuracy of the Dexcom G6 system is limited. This supports the importance of considering glucose trend arrows and, when in doubt, blood measurements during exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":39165,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","volume":"30 4","pages":"211-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pedm.2024.146685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) has become an integral component of modern diabetes management. However, sensor performance data of adolescents, especially during exercise, are scarce. Therefore, this investigation aimed to determine the performance of a rtCGM-system before, during, and after exercise around a 4-week track and field training intervention in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Material and methods: Eight adolescents (2 females, 15.5 ±1.0 years, BMI: 21.0 ±2.3 kg/m2) with T1D and an HbA1c of 7.0 ±0.6% (53.0 ±6.6 mmol/mol) participated in a 4-week track and field intervention consisting of three 60-minute exercise sessions per week. Sensor glucose levels (Dexcom G6; Dexcom Inc., San Diego, CA) were obtained at rest and after 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes during, as well as 5 minutes after exercise and compared to a reference capillary blood glucose value (Biosen S-Line, EKF Diagnostics, GER). rtCGM performance was assessed using the median absolute relative difference (MedARD) and interquartile range [IQR] as well as the Bland-Altman method.

Results: 443 points of comparison were available for analysis. The overall MedARD (IQR) was 19.1% (12.2-27.3). MedARDs for time in range (70-180 mg/dl), below range ( 180 mg/dl) were 22.0% (17.8-29.2), 28.4% (18.8-36.3), and 15.9% (9.4-20.7), respectively. The in-exercise MedARD was 19.4% (12.3-27.8), and pre- and post-exercise MedARDs were 21.6% (14.5-28.3) and 14.9% (9.0-21.6), respectively.

Conclusions: In structured track and field training involving adolescents with T1D, the accuracy of the Dexcom G6 system is limited. This supports the importance of considering glucose trend arrows and, when in doubt, blood measurements during exercise.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Elevated level of prenatal testosterone and vitamin D3 deficiency during pregnancy, in the presence of prenatal maternal stress, and their association with the development of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-like symptoms in toddlers. Hereditary vitamin D resistant rickets (HVDRR) case series: phenotype, genotype, conventional treatment, and adjunctive cinacalcet therapy. Human growth hormone therapy - in three stages: past, present, and future. Importance of diet in children and adolescents with obesity and asthma. Indications for genetic diagnosis in children with growth hormone deficiency and born small for gestational age.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1